Can you say "martinet"?

[Darkwind]

You've totally missed the point, as always.

No...

It is you and the left that has missed the point.

What you guys did was reprehensible and walked right up to the line.

Don't think it will ever be forgotten.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They spewed broad statements at them.

What a normal person not on a crusade would just call the correct interpretation of the code.

 

[TemplarKormac]

What a normal person not on a crusade would just call the correct interpretation of the code.

What code(s) were they citing? Hmm?

 

[Crepitus]

hey crep how long were you in the military?...

I was never in the US military in any way, shape, or form.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And presuming you aren't military or retired military, how the f**k would you know that?

Because I read about things, BEFORE opening my mouth about them.

You should try.

The general rule is to obey orders presuming their legality until told otherwise.

Yes, the "general rule", because , generally, illegal orders don't come around a lot.

But in no universe or in any military code is a soldier required to be TOLD by another soldier or officer or anyone else that an order is illegal, before refusing it as an unlawful order.

 

[Rogue AI]

Wherever is fine. The 1st Amendment covers the courts, and UMCJ covers the military courts.

Kelly is still subject to UCMJ. So this is being handled in the proper manner if he faces a court martial. Glad that is cleared up.

 

[fncceo]

Can you say "martinet"?​

Sure.

 

[IM2]

Too funny.

1. He is not illicitly using our military.
2. Every order is presumed to be lawful because otherwise, the breakdown of command would be immediate.
3.what hes doing. This is pure paranoia from the left.

Trump is indeed using the military that way.

Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes​

MSN

This is the top military lawyer telling Trump not to do what he is doing.

 

[IM2]

Kelly is still subject to UCMJ. So this is being handled in the proper manner if he faces a court martial. Glad that is cleared up.

There is no cause for court martial.

 

[Rogue AI]

Because I read about things, BEFORE opening my mouth about them.

You should try.


Yes, the "general rule", because , generally, illegal orders don't come around a lot.

But in no universe or in any military code is a soldier required to be TOLD by another soldier or officer or anyone else that an order is illegal, before refusing it as an unlawful order.

The problem you loons have is that the orders implied by the left are not unit level, they at service level. These seditionists are ignoring the entire chain of command in the hopes the troops question orders way beyond their pay grade. Questions of legality in orders from the president start at the Pentagon, not at the squad level. You folks are wrong about this on every level.

 

[Rogue AI]

Trump is indeed using the military that way.

Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes​

MSN

This is the top military lawyer telling Trump not to do what he is doing.

Back to anonymous sources, how pathetic.

 

[Yarddog]

Yes I can say that, but thats about the time the bartender cuts me off and calls the Uber.

 

[Lockback]

I think he's just jealous because he doesn't even have so much as a CIB.

There's also the fact the hegseth is pretty much the lest respected sec-def in history.

No he isn't.
Only douchebags like you think that because of your irrational, insane hatred for Donald Trump. Young men like him and are joining in record numbers now that Diaper Joe and Lloyd (MIA) Austin are gone.

"I didn't think it was a big deal when I was missing in action in the hospital for several days. I mean, military readiness is highly overrated. Being on the Board of Raytheon was more fun: booze, broads and LOTS of money!"

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Kelly is still subject to UCMJ.

Which he all but read from directly. So he is covered.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The problem you loons have is that the orders implied by the left are not unit level, they at service level.

And higher. Thats not a problem. That's a feature. That's the intent of the message.

One with which anyone real American agrees.

You see it as a problem, because cult.

 

[IM2]

Back to anonymous sources, how pathetic.

Yoy are fine with anonymoou s sources when its Trump or Repubicans. The fact here is, that a top military lawyer told Trump this would put soldiers in jeopardy of going to prison and Trump did not care, so just because you want to believe it's OK for the US to bomb and kill at will when a Republican is Ptresident, doesn't change this fact.

 

[IM2]

No he isn't.
Only douchebags like you think that because of your irrational, insane hatred for Donald Trump. Young men like him and are joining in record numbers now that Diaper Joe and Lloyd (MIA) Austin are gone.

"I didn't think it was a big deal when I was missing in action in the hospital for several days. I mean, military readiness is highly overrated. Being on the Board of Raytheon was more fun: booze, broads and LOTS of money!"

Wrong.

 

[Rawley]

I was never in the US military in any way, shape, or form.

It shows.

 

[Lockback]

And higher. Thats not a problem. That's a feature. That's the intent of the message.

One with which anyone real American agrees.

You see it as a problem, because cult.

The "CULT" won the majority of American voters a year ago.
Poor baby.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The "CULT" won the majority of American voters a year ago.
Poor baby.

No , you overestimate your embarrassing cult. It definitely is not comprised of all those who voted Trump in 2024.