Can we cut the bullshit about spending under Obama?

[Avorysuds]

TARP, Stimulus, 150 billion a year more in military spending and over 1 trillion a year in money printed by the FED-R.

Or did Bush save the economy by doing TARP/Stimulus...

You're to easy to beat the chit outa~ Because you're a liar.

The point is that the rate of spending has not increased under Obama.

And for the record, it has even by your ******* dumb ass inbreed chart, by 1.4 ******* % you lying dip chit... You ******* posted it even lol.

 

[Billy000]

TARP, Stimulus, 150 billion a year more in military spending and over 1 trillion a year in money printed by the FED-R.

Or did Bush save the economy by doing TARP/Stimulus...

You're to easy to beat the chit outa~ Because you're a liar.

The point is that the rate of spending has not increased under Obama.

And for the record, it has even by your ******* dumb ass inbreed chart, by 1.4 ******* % you lying dip chit... You ******* posted it even lol.

I didn't post a chart you dumbshit. Spending fell by 65 billion. It says so my OP.

 

[Avorysuds]

The point is that the rate of spending has not increased under Obama.

And for the record, it has even by your ******* dumb ass inbreed chart, by 1.4 ******* % you lying dip chit... You ******* posted it even lol.

I didn't post a chart you dumbshit. Spending fell by 65 billion. It says so my OP.

My bad, BL posted the chart, argue with him. Even you crying bitchz can't agree if Obama grew spending or if he balanced the budget despite massive deficits. That's they problem with lying, none of you have the same story.

Bush = chitty big spender President

Obama = chitty bigger spending President

Deal with it.

And for the last time, 1 ******* trillion a year is left off the books while the tax revenue PRINTING THE MONEY creates is credited to Obama as some sort of "recovery." If you took the revenues created off MASS DEFICIT SPENDING from the Fed-R Obama would still be running well over a trillion dollar a year deficit.

Imagine Bush getting 1 trillion a year off the books spending by the Fed-R, lets just pretend 200 billion turned into tax revenues, Obama's worst year would be 200 billion less, making Obama's budgets look 200 billion worse.


Again, Obama get's over 1 trillion a year off the books, but he gets the tax revenues credited to him. If you did the same for all pasted Presidents all of a sudden Obama looks like a ******* retarded child chitting all over the economy. Imagine if Bush handed the 1% a trillion+ a year, you would ******* demand Bush be "Ki!!d." But it's Obama, so like mindless drone you defend, because you hate children.... and the middle class........

 

[Billy000]

And for the record, it has even by your ******* dumb ass inbreed chart, by 1.4 ******* % you lying dip chit... You ******* posted it even lol.

I didn't post a chart you dumbshit. Spending fell by 65 billion. It says so my OP.

My bad, BL posted the chart, argue with him. Even you crying bitchz can't agree if Obama grew spending or if he balanced the budget despite massive deficits. That's they problem with lying, none of you have the same story.

Bush = chitty big spender President

Obama = chitty bigger spending President

Deal with it.

And for the last time, 1 ******* trillion a year is left off the books while the tax revenue PRINTING THE MONEY creates is credited to Obama as some sort of "recovery." If you took the revenues created off MASS DEFICIT SPENDING from the Fed-R Obama would still be running well over a trillion dollar a year deficit.

Imagine Bush getting 1 trillion a year off the books spending by the Fed-R, lets just pretend 200 billion turned into tax revenues, Obama's worst year would be 200 billion less, making Obama's budgets look 200 billion worse.


Again, Obama get's over 1 trillion a year off the books, but he gets the tax revenues credited to him. If you did the same for all pasted Presidents all of a sudden Obama looks like a ******* retarded child chitting all over the economy. Imagine if Bush handed the 1% a trillion+ a year, you would ******* demand Bush be "Ki!!d." But it's Obama, so like mindless drone you defend, because you hate children.... and the middle class........

You know without posting non partisan sources to support the crap you are saying, you sound like a little girl whining.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I didn't post a chart you dumbshit. Spending fell by 65 billion. It says so my OP.

My bad, BL posted the chart, argue with him. Even you crying bitchz can't agree if Obama grew spending or if he balanced the budget despite massive deficits. That's they problem with lying, none of you have the same story.

Bush = chitty big spender President

Obama = chitty bigger spending President

Deal with it.

And for the last time, 1 ******* trillion a year is left off the books while the tax revenue PRINTING THE MONEY creates is credited to Obama as some sort of "recovery." If you took the revenues created off MASS DEFICIT SPENDING from the Fed-R Obama would still be running well over a trillion dollar a year deficit.

Imagine Bush getting 1 trillion a year off the books spending by the Fed-R, lets just pretend 200 billion turned into tax revenues, Obama's worst year would be 200 billion less, making Obama's budgets look 200 billion worse.


Again, Obama get's over 1 trillion a year off the books, but he gets the tax revenues credited to him. If you did the same for all pasted Presidents all of a sudden Obama looks like a ******* retarded child chitting all over the economy. Imagine if Bush handed the 1% a trillion+ a year, you would ******* demand Bush be "Ki!!d." But it's Obama, so like mindless drone you defend, because you hate children.... and the middle class........

You know without posting non partisan sources to support the crap you are saying, you sound like a little girl whining.

Actually, that'd be you.

 

[Politico]

No we can't.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Go crazy. While you're at it, prove me wrong.

I already did. I guess in Obamaland, where you apparently reside, math is a taboo.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Obama has cut infrastructure, science and r@d funding the past 5 years.

80 billion out of infrastructure since 2009.

 

[Billy000]

Go crazy. While you're at it, prove me wrong.

I already did. I guess in Obamaland, where you apparently reside, math is a taboo.

Nothing you said disputed the facts in the article. You didn't even provide sources. You failed at this miserably.

 

[Darkwind]

When you have to start parsing very specific items on an issue to prove your guy doesn't look as bad as some claim, you've already lost the discussion.

 

[TemplarKormac]

How many times are you liberals gonna repeat this ridiculous claim? If Obama wasn't over-spending, the debt wouldn't be $7 trillion higher than it was when he came into office. The facts just ain't on your side. Sorry.

Whoops

Now, as the economy expands, the growth of federal spending as a percentage of GDP will get smaller. Since the amount is an even smaller part of the entire monetary worth of the entire economy. Meaning that it can spend the same amount, or even more money than before, so long as the economy continues to grow as well. So, that chart is disingenuous. Should you compare Obama's spending with previous economies, the federal expenditure rate would considerably greater.

 

[ron4342]

Whoops

Oh, so all the 1 Trillion + deficits don't count because Obama was President....


This is getting ******* retarded.

Again, the FED-R 1 trillion + spent a year (that has never in the history of the ******* plant earth occurred before) does not even count.... unless you count the tax revenues and the markets looking up because Obama is dumping cash on the 1% to loan to the 99% at far higher rates.


Thanks Obama, and the left...

"Growth" in spending and "spending" are two different things. It's amazing how you don't understand that. Obama took TARP and a stimulus, pretends it's all Bush's spending, and then from there claims to only grow spending by baby steps.... lol, oooooook.

funny little chart ya have there

nice slight of hand in the "09" year

--LOL

Obama Signs Stimulus Into Law

Ahhhhh..... Another looney conservative who knows EXACTLY what they believe and who does not want to be confused by facts or the truth (even when the truth is presented in a chart form which an idiot could understand.)

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama has cut infrastructure, science and r@d funding the past 5 years.

80 billion out of infrastructure since 2009.

Wasnt 2009 the year they passed the "Stimulus" that provided for $47B in extra infrastructure spending? Wouldn't spending go down once the funding ended for those "shovel ready" projects?
Yeah.
Libs are bad at math and history.


As for the OP: The U.S. owes $7T more than the day Obama took office. That is 70% more than the deficit was, even counting the "massive deficits" of Pres Bush. There is no way to spin that number with "rates of increase" etc. It represents a massive failure by the Democrats, who are entirely responsible for every penny of it since they controlled Congress from 2006 to 2010.

 

[The Rabbi]

Oh, so all the 1 Trillion + deficits don't count because Obama was President....


This is getting ******* retarded.

Again, the FED-R 1 trillion + spent a year (that has never in the history of the ******* plant earth occurred before) does not even count.... unless you count the tax revenues and the markets looking up because Obama is dumping cash on the 1% to loan to the 99% at far higher rates.


Thanks Obama, and the left...

"Growth" in spending and "spending" are two different things. It's amazing how you don't understand that. Obama took TARP and a stimulus, pretends it's all Bush's spending, and then from there claims to only grow spending by baby steps.... lol, oooooook.

funny little chart ya have there

nice slight of hand in the "09" year

--LOL

Obama Signs Stimulus Into Law

Ahhhhh..... Another looney conservative who knows EXACTLY what they believe and who does not want to be confused by facts or the truth (even when the truth is persented in a chart form which even an idiot would understand.)

Another lib who cannot read a chart.

Please, for our amusement, would you describe exactly what the chart shows?

 

[Billy000]

How many times are you liberals gonna repeat this ridiculous claim? If Obama wasn't over-spending, the debt wouldn't be $7 trillion higher than it was when he came into office. The facts just ain't on your side. Sorry.

Whoops

Now, as the economy expands, the growth of federal spending as a percentage of GDP will get smaller. Since the amount is an even smaller part of the entire monetary worth of the entire economy. Meaning that it can spend the same amount, or even more money than before, so long as the economy continues to grow as well. So, that chart is disingenuous. Should you compare Obama's spending with previous economies, the federal expenditure rate would considerably greater.

That would hardly make a difference. Just accept facts for what they are.

 

[mudwhistle]

I was right: Under Obama, spending has been flat - Rex Nutting - MarketWatch




Facts:


1. Obama will add more to the Federal debt than all other U.S. President combined.


2. The moderate slow down in current deficit spending is due to the sequester which Obama claims he had nothing to do with and blames on the Republicans. The Dems also hate it.


So I guess in reality you should be thanking the Republicans for slowly down deficit spending.

Obama did nothing to increase spending.

And if you plug your ears, close your eyes, and stamp your feet you can make it be true......

 

[Geaux4it]

Me like charts

-Geaux

 

[Billy000]

Obama has cut infrastructure, science and r@d funding the past 5 years.

80 billion out of infrastructure since 2009.

Wasnt 2009 the year they passed the "Stimulus" that provided for $47B in extra infrastructure spending? Wouldn't spending go down once the funding ended for those "shovel ready" projects?
Yeah.
Libs are bad at math and history.


As for the OP: The U.S. owes $7T more than the day Obama took office. That is 70% more than the deficit was, even counting the "massive deficits" of Pres Bush. There is no way to spin that number with "rates of increase" etc. It represents a massive failure by the Democrats, who are entirely responsible for every penny of it since they controlled Congress from 2006 to 2010.

And yet the deficit is falling faster than it has since WWII

 

[Billy000]

Me like charts

-Geaux

Can you connect these issues with Obama's policies? No, you cannot.

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama has cut infrastructure, science and r@d funding the past 5 years.

80 billion out of infrastructure since 2009.

Wasnt 2009 the year they passed the "Stimulus" that provided for $47B in extra infrastructure spending? Wouldn't spending go down once the funding ended for those "shovel ready" projects?
Yeah.
Libs are bad at math and history.


As for the OP: The U.S. owes $7T more than the day Obama took office. That is 70% more than the deficit was, even counting the "massive deficits" of Pres Bush. There is no way to spin that number with "rates of increase" etc. It represents a massive failure by the Democrats, who are entirely responsible for every penny of it since they controlled Congress from 2006 to 2010.

And yet the deficit is falling faster than it has since WWII

Irrelevant. The deficit is bigger than it's ever been. And it will increase once the subsidies for Obamacare kick in.