Can Somebody Please Tell Me What A Woman Is?

[mamooth]

Nope science is easy and you are a Moron stop with your SJW experiments especially when children are involved

It's not normal to have the fantasies that you have, you know.

 

[Frankenstein]

It's not normal to have the fantasies that you have, you know.

Thank you for proving my point you are a MORON and an immature one at that!

 

[Thunk]

That's just hard science, so I expect conservatives to ignore it.

Because science says if a pervert "BELIEVES" he's a woman then he IS a woman.

And if a democrat "BELIEVES" he won the election then he DID win the election.

Go scream at the sky tootsie.

 

[martybegan]

As there are natural XY females and XX males, totally wrong.

That's just hard science, so I expect conservatives to ignore it.

We had definitions for woman and man long before we knew about genetics, so clearly genetics has nothing to do with it.

And that leaves conservatives flailing. If they can't fail at biology, they've got nothing.

No there are not.

 

[Mortis]

As I'm getting a headache. You see, I thought that a woman was a person who menstruates, has ovaries, a uterus, and can get pregnant, but according to this article women are anybody who feels like a woman and are exactly identical to biological women. So then what in the world does trans mean!?

A woman is Eve....who blamed Adam for eating from the Tree of Knowledge. She eventually gave birth to Cain and Abel - who she blamed Adam for that, too!

Seriously, a woman is taken from the two words - "Womb" and "Man". (From what my parents told me, are they wrong?)

 

[Road Runner]

We had definitions for woman and man long before we knew about genetics, so clearly genetics has nothing to do with it.

This cat's craaaaazzzzyyy!!!

I understand. Science is hard. Common sense is hard, at least for a conservative.

No there are not.

Except for a tiny percentage of mutants.

 

[Seymour Flops]

When Jackson Browne first failed to answer this question during her nomination hearing, it was repeated over and over on this forum. At first, none of the liberal Democrats were willing to answer.

I asked them several times to just admit that their real answer is “a woman is someone who identifies as a woman.”

They refused because that is so ridiculous. But now that is the standard answer of the left.

 

[Foxfyre]

The current gold standard.

Attractive, pretty, pleasant, fun but not what I would call the gold standard.

This is pretty close though:

 

[Road Runner]

I asked them several times to just admit that their real answer is “a woman is someone who identifies as a woman.”

Which as a woman myself that is such an insult to me and (real) women everywhere.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Which as a woman myself that is such an insult to me and (real) women everywhere.

And that is what it is intended to be.

There are deep roots of misogyny among the gay males of the Democratic Party. Gay men have always liked to dress up as women to mock them. But at least in the past, they understood that it was adult entertainment For Supposedly “straight” men who are themselves pretty misogynistic.

Now they have two goals: to force the rest of us to pretend that when dress as women they somehow transsubstantiate into women and to create a new generation of hybrids. “Girls with something extra“ which seems to be such burning desire for them, that they are completely ruthless, as to whose young lives they damage pursuing that end.

Don’t think that the women of the Democratic Party cannot be misogynist. They are, but special type of misogyny, a hatred reserved only for normal women who want to get married and raise children. The so-called feminist and wokesters make no attempt to hide their distain for typical women.

 

[mamooth]

No there are not.

Facts don't care about your feelings. XY women and XX men exist. Biology is what it is, no matter how frantically you deny it.

 

[mamooth]

Now they have two goals: to force the rest of us to pretend that when dress as women they somehow transsubstantiate into women and to create a new generation of hybrids. “

As that sentence shows, conservapervation is a real problem, with the conserapervs getting more and more unhinged with their weird and creepy fantasies.

There's no need to ask if he was touching himself as he typed that. You know he was.

Anways, there's a reason the conservapervs only reveal these fantasies in a safespace with the other pervs. They know how they would be looked at if they talked like that in the real world.

 

[martybegan]

Facts don't care about your feelings. XY women and XX men exist. Biology is what it is, no matter how frantically you deny it.

99.99% of the trannies we are talking about don't fall into that category if it even exists, and you are probably confusing it with XXY, or XYY

 

[Seymour Flops]

As that sentence shows, conservapervation is a real problem, with the conserapervs getting more and more unhinged with their weird and creepy fantasies.

There's no need to ask if he was touching himself as he typed that. You know he was.

Anways, there's a reason the conservapervs only reveal these fantasies in a safespace with the other pervs. They know how they would be looked at if they talked like that in the real world.

Please explain “XX men” and “XY women.”

Does it apply to babies? Toddlers? Children?

 

[Road Runner]

Please explain “XX men” and “XY women.”

Does it apply to babies? Toddlers? Children?

Or Marvel Super heroes? Minus an X that is.

 

[Seymour Flops]

99.99% of the trannies we are talking about don't fall into that category if it even exists, and you are probably confusing it with XXY, or XYY

That's not actually what she means.

She means that "woman" and "man" are terms unrelated to biology.

So the 99.99% is exactly who she means. They have XY chromosomes, for example and were identified by medical professionals as boys when they were born, and remained boys until they decided that they could have a better chance of winning medals in sports if they claimed to be a girl, or maybe finally find a "straight" boyfriend if they dressed up like a girl, instead of a very unattractive gay man.

That's what she means by an "XY woman."

 

[whitehall]

The left wing war against genetic women is a symptom of the power of the left wing lying bastards in the media to convince mostly ignorant Americans that DNA isn't a real science while man made global warming is.

 

[martybegan]

That's not actually what she means.

She means that "woman" and "man" are terms unrelated to biology.

So the 99.99% is exactly who she means. They have XY chromosomes, for example and were identified by medical professionals as boys when they were born, and remained boys until they decided that they could have a better chance of winning medals in sports if they claimed to be a girl, or maybe finally find a "straight" boyfriend if they dressed up like a girl, instead of a very unattractive gay man.

That's what she means by an "XY woman."

Like the poster, that's retarded.

 

[mamooth]

Please explain “XX men” and “XY women.”

Someone with an XX chromosome set has the physical form of a man.

Someone with an XY chromosome set has the physical form of a woman.

Does it apply to babies? Toddlers? Children?

Well, yeah. They don't change form as they grow. They're born that way.

If you're all this ignorant of the topic, you shouldn't be bothering the adults.

 

[80zephyr]

As there are natural XY females and XX males, totally wrong.

That's just hard science, so I expect conservatives to ignore it.

We had definitions for woman and man long before we knew about genetics, so clearly genetics has nothing to do with it.

And that leaves conservatives flailing. If they can't fail at biology, they've got nothing.

Lets say you are correct. Can a normal xx male become a woman?