They're the same policies.
But continue to support them anyway, I like it when you expose yourself.
Hitlers 1942 policy statement regarding Slavic abortion:
""In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-German population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman’s health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics."
What was your stance on abortion again?
You may cut and paste the above, it will save you time. Substitute whatever term you'd like for "slavic".
http://www.ima.org.il/imaj/ar07mar-23.pdf
"
The programs of mass murder began when physicians
decided that human life was of differential value; when
race became a metaphor for disease."
In your case, the unborn and the poor are a metaphor for disease, which is even more heinous than what the Nazis proposed. At least they thought that some human life had value, even if it was a limited type of human.
Most pro-abortionists today claim no human life has value except that which is granted it by its mother...and if she doesn't then nobody else should. Whereas the Nazis sought only to exterminate certain races/religions/groups, most pro-abortionists today would like to see ALL of mankind removed from the earth...or at least the numbers radically reduced.