Apart from the fact you provided absolutely NO analysis that the poll was in anyway invalid...or that you provided a poll that argues differently what was your point?
The Knights of Columbus. Enough said. That makes it invalid.
Perhaps if women could not get abortion on demand (which kills babies btw)
That's your opinion, an opinion most people don't share.
Yeah, and there's also billions of years of genetic hardwiring to drive us to screw. Now, yeah, it would be wonderful if we taught better birth control... but the Religious Right doesn't want to talk about anything but abstinence, and they'll get Bristol Palin to tell you all about it.
But I digress...the issue for pro life folks is that they actually agree with science that the unborn are genetically complete and living human beings. As such they actually believe the unborn deserve constitutional protection from the lawful slaughter conducted under the banner "woman's right to choose". In much the same way abolitionists (they were mostly Christians too) believed that the lawful slaughter and ownership of black Americans was wrong (remember they were not lawfully considered fully human either).
Yawn. Fetuses aren't people. Sorry, they just aren't. They aren't babies. If they were, we should treat every tampon as a potential crime scene, as their might well be a zygote in there somewhere.
I hate my job now!
You pro abortionists are some mentally sick folks.
an easy to find more recent poll
Again, the same Gallup that predicted that Romney would win by 7 points when he lost by 4...
I'm a pragmatist. Women are going to get abortions, NO MATTER WHAT THE LAW IS.
Take for example, the Philippines, Catholic Country, abortion is completely illegal there, dirt poor, and 800,000 abortions happen there out of a population of 90 million.