The title of the OP has little or nothing to do with the article posted.
Third and fourth paragraphs:
The rule would prohibit disclosure of medical records of individuals who seek reproductive health care in a state in which the care is legal to officials or litigants in a home state in which it is not.
Under the proposed rule, the records would be shielded from law enforcement, court subpoenas and in civil lawsuits and family court proceedings.
To me, a better question is what the heck happened to doctor-patient privacy, and doctors being allowed to follow the Hippocratic Oath? Several things, But HIPAA was the biggest blow, essentially codifying state corporate violations of patient privacy in the name of protecting patient privacy.
If that is of no interest, you might ask, "should records regarding those who seek reproductive health care in another state be shielded from requirements to disclose them under court order, while other medical records remain available for subpoena?"
Restoring true doctor-patient confidentiality would sheild such records, but shielding all medical records.