LBGT people are American citizens and such defense shouldn't be considered far left at all as they're people for Christ sakes
For Christ sakes what? Can you give me a subject what you are talking about? Who is somehow harming the LBGT community?
I have quite a few moderate to right wing positions that I believe in. I just think that we should have an safetynet, help the poor and treat people with respect. Is that ok?
Sure, if you want to pay for it. I will contribute too if you come up with an effective program. If you mean rob the rich and enslave the poor as Democrats advocate, I'm out
I believe in the death penalty, I believe in an large amount of capitalism and aint afraid to have a large military for starters.
I am against metoo and blacklivesmatters.
So why are you consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome then?
1. LBGT people deserve legal protection just like anyone else. They shouldn't be made to feel that they aint welcome within our society either. Freedom is about accepting that not everyone is going to live the way you do. One example is the hatred for trangender people as I believe it is unfounded and needs to stop, while another is the bans on gay adoption of children...Why exactly should anyone be excluded that is a citizen of our country? Some people will even argue that these people shouldn't get medical attention for Pete sakes. It is about human rights and being an society that accepts people as people.
2. We're all better off for having SSI for the old, an educated population(85% of the population get tax payer education) and exist to healthcare for most of our society through medicaid and medicare. Something like 80% of all old people use these programs for nursing home care, etc.A lot of these people would be the poor that are in the gutter if not for these programs as in india and some of the poorer parts of the world. Our economy is far larger for it and our standards of living are higher than most of the world that doesn't have it. I am arguing that it is worth it for me and you to have it.
3. Because of his attacks on human rights as explained in 1. and his disrespect for the poor in my second argument.