Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,459
- 847
- 140
" Can Federal And State Legislators Be Prosecuted By We The People For Breaking Article 1 Section 4 Of Us Constitution ? "
* Level Of Concern With Numerology Bent On Stacking Supreme Court Justices *
One should under stand that impeachment from us house of representatives is a civil infraction , as determined by preponderance of the evidence and not determined by without a reasonable doubt , and thereby one can not declare another individual guilty of a crime , with purposes of defaming them for being found liable in a civil contest without subjecting themselves to libel or slander .
The formal proceedings for a criminal trial of legislators is managed by us senate and over seen by us supreme court .
* Direct Elaboration On Bending Versus Breaking An Amalgam Of Law *
Article I Section 4 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
" The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. "
A question won is this , " Did modifications of methods for distributing and collecting ballots , violate the methods of current legislated law for distributing and collecting ballots ? " .
* To Limp Representation Hoping Non Specific Things Grow With Ones Preferred Direction *
Where an affirmative answer to a question won is yes , an offensive action entitles we the people to hold federal and state representatives accountable for those civil offenses committed against the deontology of legislated law that is article 1 section 4 of us constitution .
Which reasons are valid to prosecute the huff and puff paranoia applied by self aggrandized despots internal to us house and us senate who convinced themselves of an entitlement to disavow the deontology of written law ?
Any citizen may bring forwards a complaint and a grand jury of private citizens can be convened with notice to state and federal magistrates and a precedence can be set where evidence of statutory crime has been committed by any against the republic .
Whether it is litigation for a civil offense - based upon a preponderance of the evidence , or whether it is litigation for a criminal offense - based on beyond a reasonable doubt and for which one may be found guilty , the political actors of the 2020 election should be pursued by we the people with valid grievances of law .
* One Wing Flying Inn Seine Madd Circles *
It should be noted that left wing minds embrace consequentialism with prejudice against deontology .
Those wield behaviors of which minds of the left are capable is clearly evident from the litany of offenses and disregard for article 1 section 4 of us constitution .
* Level Of Concern With Numerology Bent On Stacking Supreme Court Justices *
One should under stand that impeachment from us house of representatives is a civil infraction , as determined by preponderance of the evidence and not determined by without a reasonable doubt , and thereby one can not declare another individual guilty of a crime , with purposes of defaming them for being found liable in a civil contest without subjecting themselves to libel or slander .
The formal proceedings for a criminal trial of legislators is managed by us senate and over seen by us supreme court .
* Direct Elaboration On Bending Versus Breaking An Amalgam Of Law *
Article I Section 4 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
" The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. "
A question won is this , " Did modifications of methods for distributing and collecting ballots , violate the methods of current legislated law for distributing and collecting ballots ? " .
* To Limp Representation Hoping Non Specific Things Grow With Ones Preferred Direction *
Where an affirmative answer to a question won is yes , an offensive action entitles we the people to hold federal and state representatives accountable for those civil offenses committed against the deontology of legislated law that is article 1 section 4 of us constitution .
Which reasons are valid to prosecute the huff and puff paranoia applied by self aggrandized despots internal to us house and us senate who convinced themselves of an entitlement to disavow the deontology of written law ?
Any citizen may bring forwards a complaint and a grand jury of private citizens can be convened with notice to state and federal magistrates and a precedence can be set where evidence of statutory crime has been committed by any against the republic .
Whether it is litigation for a civil offense - based upon a preponderance of the evidence , or whether it is litigation for a criminal offense - based on beyond a reasonable doubt and for which one may be found guilty , the political actors of the 2020 election should be pursued by we the people with valid grievances of law .
* One Wing Flying Inn Seine Madd Circles *
It should be noted that left wing minds embrace consequentialism with prejudice against deontology .
Those wield behaviors of which minds of the left are capable is clearly evident from the litany of offenses and disregard for article 1 section 4 of us constitution .
Deontology - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Consequentialism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org