EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 82,099
- 57,334
- 2,645
Poverty is a status that can be changed. Equality does not exist without tyranny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes and no TipsycatloverPoverty is a status that can be changed. Equality does not exist without tyranny.
The Democrats don't talk about poverty because no one, except for the homeless, is poor anymore.
Ranks with the War on Drugs, where both generated jobs and contracts for people profiting off drugs, poverty and dependence on govt....The Democrats don't talk about poverty because no one, except for the homeless, is poor anymore.
I guess LBJs’ War on Poverty was a winner, ay?
Ranks with the War on Drugs, where both generated jobs and contracts for people profiting off drugs, poverty and dependence on govt....The Democrats don't talk about poverty because no one, except for the homeless, is poor anymore.
I guess LBJs’ War on Poverty was a winner, ay?
I’m aware of a substantial segment of United States population being financially poor, but prior to reading Blackrook’s and Edward’s posts, I was unaware that all of them are also homeless.I think you are right! But it seems odd how they were able to switch and get so much traction so quickly on a totally idiotic issue. ...The Democrats don't talk about poverty because no one, except for the homeless, is poor anymore.
I’m aware of a substantial segment of United States population being financially poor, but prior to reading Blackrook’s and Edward’s posts, I was unaware that all of them are also homeless.I think you are right! But it seems odd how they were able to switch and get so much traction so quickly on a totally idiotic issue. ...The Democrats don't talk about poverty because no one, except for the homeless, is poor anymore.
Contending particularly liberals believe that inequality is of greater than concern for poverty within our nation, is Edward’s, and I suppose may possibly be Blackrook’s opinion. Their opinions are not based or supported by facts.
I’m not aware of a majority of any particularly defined segments within our nation’s spectrums of political among groups or individuals’ have a greater concern for inequality rather than poverty within our nation. I disagree with the rational of Edward’s statement, (i.e. the title of this thread). Edward's statement 's not factually supported.
Respectfully, Supposn
Financial inequality causes poverty. That's why your poor.I'd guess most of the 3rd world would love to live here and be inequal but not poor. Maybe the liberals care only about inequality because poverty has been eliminated?