JoeB131
Diamond Member
common sense?
I've seen very few 'common sense' suggestions made.
Right. It's much better to let maniacs buy machine guns because 200 years ago, a bunch of slave rapists couldn't clearly define a mlitia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
common sense?
I've seen very few 'common sense' suggestions made.
How do you enforce child support laws after you've deported someone out of your jurisdiction?More speaking from your asshole. And no, I think America is enforcing child support laws. You think the US hands someone a plane ticket without vetting them?
Other than the official tally of DHS saying only 35,000 people have used the "Go Home" app.You have exactly nothing to back up your opinions.
Because it's still horseshit numbers..Backed up by the Inspector General. You're just ignorant and have not an ounce of desire to learn actual facts.
Boy you really are not very smart. I'm sorry for you. If they had back child support due and were discovered trying to collect $1000 and a plane ticket what would (NON-BIDEN) border control do?How do you enforce child support laws after you've deported someone out of your jurisdiction?
riiiiiiiight and any other means the guy has or is traveling with. Are you catching up?I mean, I guess they could collect it from that $1000.00.
It's like you don't know what gotaways are. They both come and go.Other than the official tally of DHS saying only 35,000 people have used the "Go Home" app.
LOL, says your asshole.Because it's still horseshit numbers..
If they had back child support due and were discovered trying to collect $1000 and a plane ticket what would (NON-BIDEN) border control do?
I agree. That's why this whole effort is useless. More people will end up coming in than Trump is deporting.It's like you don't know what gotaways are. They both come and go.
Nope, it just horseshit. That the government doens't know where they are at right now doesn't mean they are missing. It just means the government didn't go looking for them.It's a completely accurate number that you hate hearing because it hurts your opinions.
so you're saying you have NO idea about background checks on machine guns?Right. It's much better to let maniacs buy machine guns because 200 years ago, a bunch of slave rapists couldn't clearly define a mlitia.
so you're saying you have NO idea about background checks on machine guns?
and the 2nd didn't give the right to the militia, it gave it to the people.
when will you fools realize that?
The people back then meant white, male, landowners... not every crazy person who walks into a gun store and pinky swears he doesn't hear voices in his head.
The people back then meant males between the ages of 16-45, no females.The people back then meant white, male, landowners...
obviously, not democratsThey'd probably still let them leave. Who'd want to do more paperwork?
Not if you actually have border security. Why are democrats so clueless?More people will end up coming in than Trump is deporting.
That was true under Biden.That the government doens't know where they are at right now doesn't mean they are missing. It just means the government didn't go looking for them.
The people back then meant males between the ages of 16-45, no females.
Show me where it said only whites?
Not Republicans, either, as they don't even like swearing out warrants to find the people they are looking for.obviously, not democrats
No such animal. The number of crossings was declining well before Trump got there.Not if you actually have border security. Why are democrats so clueless?
The scary thing is you believe anything Fox and Trump tell you.That was true under Biden.
Trump has spent a great deal of time and effort looking for them. Of course, you're uninformed.
was Crispus Attucks a slave when he was killed?Given that all non-white people back then were either slaves or Natives, neither of which they wanted to have guns, it's self-evident.
Did he have a gun. THe reason why it was called the "Boston Massacre" was because they shot unarmed people.was Crispus Attucks a slave when he was killed?
Did he have a gun. THe reason why it was called the "Boston Massacre" was because they shot unarmed people.
From your own post.... "In his arguments, (John) Adams called the crowd "a motley rabble of saucy boys, negros and molattoes, Irish teagues and outlandish Jack Tarrs." In particular, he charged Attucks with having "undertaken to be the hero of the night," and with having precipitated a conflict by his "mad behavior."
that's the question.Did he have a gun.
that's the question.
did he, or didn't he?
he was just as likely armed as not.
and nothing prevented free blacks from owning firearms, even back then.
I’ll do it if Trump can go two days without mentioning Biden
I fail to see that as proof he didnt' own a firearm.Actually, it was unlikely he was, given that back then, guns were expensive and only the relatively affluent could afford them.
The trigger mechanisms had to be imported from Europe.