Well there is your mistake right there. You assume knowledge is only gained by hands on work or credentials. I have to inform you its not. I can do research at home on any given subject and be more knowledgeable about that subject than someone that works in the field in a relatively short time.
Valid and I have known quite a few people like that. Unfortunately they will gain no official industry respect. Nor be accepted into any industry as a full fledged member until they either put in the 'hands on' labor, and practical work experience or achieve accreditation commensurate for at least entry level. Reporters communicate aspects they do not perform the task.
How many times have you heard of coaches calling up reporters for game tips?
I'll give you a good example. i was working on a issue where data backups were failing on a server. I was an expert in the application on the server. The people I turned the issue over to were developers of the code. They guy mentioned something about encryption and it took me all of 2 hours to resolve the problem. I came back with my findings/comparisons and the guy agreed I was correct and admitted I had taught him something. They had to include a fix in the next version of code.
You have provided me an example where you were the application SME. You actually work intimately in the field gaining hands on knowledge and experience. This is not the same as me reporting on your database. Your knowledge base and credentialing are in the computers and database applications (or something directly related) correct?
Reporters are experts in communication. Not to say that all reporters everywhere are do not possess some sheepskin on the wall in the field they are reporting on, but most simply dont. The aforementioned 'Weatherman' is a prime example of such.
I am done on this topic...Good Exchange! Thank you sir!