broadandliberty.com
After the Durham report becomes public with it's condemnation of the FBI and Justice Dept, I suspect the members of Congress and the American people will not be so generous with funding for Garland and Wray and their filthy political maneuvers.Interesting.
Paul Davis: Don’t defund the FBI – change its leadership
The agency is important to maintaining law and order in America, even if change at the top is desperately needed. By Paul Davis
Defund ever 3 letter organization of the government. All have failed, all are over bloated, when you get rid of them, the deficit will come down and the country will run a hell of a lot better.Interesting.
Paul Davis: Don’t defund the FBI – change its leadership
The agency is important to maintaining law and order in America, even if change at the top is desperately needed. By Paul Davis
No, unless the small fry who make up the majority of the FBI arrests the upper echelon of dickheads, nothing will change, expect the furniture, which will cost the taxpayer more money.
I agree, they should not and definitely will not defund the FBI. If there were 75% Right Wing Republican in both houses, they still would not defund the FBI. Anybody seeing it as a realistic possibility is just an extremist nut ball with unrealistic ideas and judgement.Interesting.
Paul Davis: Don’t defund the FBI – change its leadership
The agency is important to maintaining law and order in America, even if change at the top is desperately needed. By Paul Davis
Good Grief.
Only the right wing public, for the most part. I am part of the public and like most of what they do. The vast majority of them are fine professionally minded people.
There again, it is only "some" in leadership. Political hacks, like to paint with a broad brush, or maybe a roller or spray paint, to make sure their target is covered, whether everybody near gets painted likewise or not. Just sayin...
Why have only conservatives been targeted by this agency?There again, it is only "some" in leadership. Political hacks, like to paint with a broad brush, or maybe a roller or spray paint, to make sure their target is covered, whether everybody near gets painted likewise or not. Just sayin...
Place evidence so they can frame people they dont like?
Day and time, I suppose. Remember they were targeting people like Martin Luther King, Jr, and anti-Vietnam War hippies back in the 60s, along with the assassinations that were popular at the time. Late 70 was Watergate investigations. 80s and 90s were mostly crime fighting investigations (which they are pretty good at. Early 2000s were terrorist plots and financial crimes. They Fkd up big time, mid 2000s with schemes like weapon stings that were supposed to lead to the ringleaders, but only led to losing the weapons to the groups they were investigating and got stung, themselves, along with investigating newly defined hate crimes for DOJ. Election interference by outside powers have to be investigated, but they didn't do a particularly good job at it. All along the way though, they apprehended a lot of criminals of all sort, including political criminals, financial criminals, many violent offenders and helped with a good deal of human trafficking, drug rings, high profile murders, foreign agents, kidnappings, etc, getting many convictions and amassing enough evidence, many criminals (especially white collar) freely gave confessions, as they actually are good at what they do, when they stay in their lanes, and mostly do. When some don't, it is big news and the whole agency suffers for the missteps of the few.
Garland and Wray need to be impeached and replaced.There again, it is only "some" in leadership. Political hacks, like to paint with a broad brush, or maybe a roller or spray paint, to make sure their target is covered, whether everybody near gets painted likewise or not. Just sayin...
