Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which means you require others to read it like you which is literal.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
I believe in it because I believe my interpretation is right. If my interpretation is not right, then you should be able to show how it is not right. It's my argument to make. You can't make my argument for me. THAT would be illogical.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
If I am right, then it is not intellectually dishonest. If I am wrong, you should be able to show how it was intellectually dishonest by discrediting the content of my argument.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
This is why i said this was stupid. Debating your imagination is stupid.I believe in it because I believe my interpretation is right. If my interpretation is not right, then you should be able to show how it is not right. It's my argument to make. You can't make my argument for me. THAT would be illogical.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
If it is dishonest then you should be able to show how it is dishonest.Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
I haven't made my case. I'm just rebutting your case right now.This is why i said this was stupid. Debating your imagination is stupid.I believe in it because I believe my interpretation is right. If my interpretation is not right, then you should be able to show how it is not right. It's my argument to make. You can't make my argument for me. THAT would be illogical.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
Already did. Your illiteracy isnt my problemIf it is dishonest then you should be able to show how it is dishonest.Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
Yep, and I'll cover all of that when I make my case.I understand there are many figures of speech in the bible. Like Jesus at the Last supper. "this is my body, this is my blood" Or something like that. Obviously, thats not to be taken literal.
I am referring to other things. Like the flood. Creation. The earth being flat and immobile. Etc.
That was all believed until reality flushed that shit down the drain.
Galileo got oppressed for Copernicanism. Now that is an allegory. Its convenient, ey?
You mean read it the way you think I should read it, right?Ive already explained it. If you arent smart enough to read, that isnt my problem.If it is dishonest then you should be able to show how it is dishonest.Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
Is that what you call that? HmmmI haven't made my case. I'm just rebutting your case right now.This is why i said this was stupid. Debating your imagination is stupid.I believe in it because I believe my interpretation is right. If my interpretation is not right, then you should be able to show how it is not right. It's my argument to make. You can't make my argument for me. THAT would be illogical.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
We both read it the same. You just imagine they mean something when there is no evidence they did. Hence, your imagination.You mean read it the way you think I should read it, right?Ive already explained it. If you arent smart enough to read, that isnt my problem.If it is dishonest then you should be able to show how it is dishonest.Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
Yep. You'll know it when you see it, TN.Is that what you call that? HmmmI haven't made my case. I'm just rebutting your case right now.This is why i said this was stupid. Debating your imagination is stupid.I believe in it because I believe my interpretation is right. If my interpretation is not right, then you should be able to show how it is not right. It's my argument to make. You can't make my argument for me. THAT would be illogical.I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
We do not read it the same. You want me to read it like you do. That's what this debate is about.We both read it the same. You just imagine they mean something when there is no evidence they did. Hence, your imagination.You mean read it the way you think I should read it, right?Ive already explained it. If you arent smart enough to read, that isnt my problem.If it is dishonest then you should be able to show how it is dishonest.Your interpretation isnt illogical, its dishonest. You are interpreting it differently BECAUSE the bible is illogical.If my interpretation is illogical then you should be able to show how it is illogical, right?I have argued its intellectually dishonest to call something an allegory just because it is illogical.
If you have to make shit up to believe in something, why believe in it at all?
You can interpret however you want, but i will be there to call out your dishonesty.