"California judge" blocks President Trump order withholding funding to sanctuary cities

[Fenton Lum]

And notice the leftist pukes here, once again show who really is pro-illegal alien.

Every patriot is pro-illegal alien, but only the euro ones who "discovered" the land mass and murdered off the inhabitants who had been here for millennia.

 

[TNHarley]

I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.

The judicial branch is there as a check on that executive branch. That's kind of the whole point.

Do you think that was an abuse of power or something?
Because, otherwise, I don't even see the point in you saying that. The last travel ban was within his authority. Pretty sure holding municipalities and states accountable for doing illegal acts and helping criminals is within his administrations authority as well.

Oh I didn't even address the content. I addressed the use of the adjective "California" firstly, and the wish of the other poster to dispense with the intentionally-designed system of checks and balances secondly.


Any minute now we'll hear from AG Gump: "I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an estuary in the most populous state can issue an order that stops the President of the United States in what appears to be clearly his statutory constitutional duty". I wonder if Gump voted to put this judge in place too...

so, if you don't think that, then why say it? Seems redundant.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Maybe he should have kept his mouth shut instead of making racist remarks about Judge Curiel last year. He was too stupid and somebody should have told him about checks n' balances and separation of power! LOVE IT.
Trump is ******* IMPOTENT.

so you are saying this is all a personal vendetta? Interesting

Idiot.

You've got more gaps going on than those in your post.
I think there could be a little payback going on here.
Judges, even on a local level, are arrogant as hell. Worse than surgeons.
So federal district judges think they are gods and will protect their own against pigs like Trump.
And I LIKE IT. I don't care HOW Trump gets taken down, just as long as he does.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And notice the leftist pukes here, once again show who really is pro-illegal alien.

Every patriot is pro-illegal alien, but only the euro ones who "discovered" the land mass and murdered off the inhabitants who had been here for millennia.

Don't like our immigration laws asshole?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Suppose we were under attack by North Korea and an ultra liberal judge blocked Trumps ability to wage war.

This is a MUCH more serious national problem than the just the irresponsible actions of a lone judge. They can and will put us ALL at risk over their agendas.

There needs to be some kind of judicial consensus requiring "X" number if judges from "X" number of various states to halt Executive orders that pose no threat to national security and are in fact necessary to ensure national security.

Allowing one idiot on the bench here and there to stop the President from protecting the nation is a serous risk to national security.

Imagine a federal judge issuing a stay on D-Day in 1944, lol.

These idiots need to be impeached as soon as they make these idiotic asinine rulings.

 

[jc456]

got to get the ball rolling some time eh? can't wait for SCOTUS. yippeee! shut these unconstitutional judges up.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.

The judicial branch is there as a check on that executive branch. That's kind of the whole point.

It is, but only when executives and legislators fail to exercise good judgement in taking the actions they do. Even though those elected individuals are members of one party or another, they are nonetheless the representatives of all the citizens of the U.S. When one's favorability is as low as Trump's and the Congress', good judgment, in part, includes making and enforcing policy in a win-win way, not an "I say this is best; therefore it is" way.

It all comes down to selecting the right leadership style for the situation at hand. That's what good leaders do. They don't stick to just one and apply it, come hell or high water. Given the factually fractious nature of the citizenry in the U.S. these days, a genuinely collaborative approach is what will work best.

Now, in all honesty, I don't expect too many lawyers to be savvy about the ways and means of good operations management, but I do expect a former CEO who's staffed his administration with other former CEOs to know those principles inside out and apply them to their fullest effect. As I've said before, they "play chess."

You don't have leaders, you have kleptocrats bent upon the cannibalization, extraction, concentration ,and redistribution of societal wealth.

 

[Care4all]

Another damn activist judge.

why don't we just make these judges president?

California judge blocks Trump order on sanctuary city money

What is disgusting about this is that on one hand they say that "not giving these sanctuary cities funds will hurt these cities", but on the other hand they tell these same cities that if an illegal immigrant which they defend harms or kills a citizen, they cannot be sued and are protected from culpability. Which is it? Do these cities have responsibility for their actions or not? If not, they shouldn't be given a penny from the rest of the nation that opposes these cities

Arrogant and hypocritical. These "cities" want their cake and eat it too even though the vast majority of Americans are against their positions. Kate Steinles family should sue all the way to the Supreme Court. This is bothersome at the very least. One state or another impacting the entire nation by playing a political power play.

the federal govt LET THEM IN....not the States. If the federal govt did their jobs, the States/cities would not be faced with this predicament?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Trump = not winning

Appeal it, Trump and go to the Court. You will win there.

Jake Fakey= Stolen Valor Lying Cuck.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

did he say how it violates the constitution?

Hold on to your panties, the judge's opinion will be published as this story unfolds.

 

[Fenton Lum]

And notice the leftist pukes here, once again show who really is pro-illegal alien.

Every patriot is pro-illegal alien, but only the euro ones who "discovered" the land mass and murdered off the inhabitants who had been here for millennia.

Don't like our immigration laws asshole?

Sounds like you're the one shatting hisseph over the "issue" hon.

 

[usmbguest5318]

I'm not going to comment on whether the judge/panel is right or wrong, should or shouldn't have ruled as s/he/it did, etc. because I haven't read the decision, nor do I know off the top of my head what precedents and so on pertain to the matter, and, frankly, I don't feel like making the effort to find out. I will say, however, that at this rate, we're going to end up with country being "run" by the judicial rather than by the executive branch.

The judicial branch is there as a check on that executive branch. That's kind of the whole point.

Do you think that was an abuse of power or something?
Because, otherwise, I don't even see the point in you saying that. The last travel ban was within his authority. Pretty sure holding municipalities and states accountable for doing illegal acts and helping criminals is within his administrations authority as well.

Oh I didn't even address the content. I addressed the use of the adjective "California" firstly, and the wish of the other poster to dispense with the intentionally-designed system of checks and balances secondly.


Any minute now we'll hear from AG Gump: "I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an estuary in the most populous state can issue an order that stops the President of the United States in what appears to be clearly his statutory constitutional duty". I wonder if Gump voted to put this judge in place too...

the wish of the other poster to dispense with the intentionally-designed system of checks and balances secondly.

Whoa, nelly! That is an inference you made from what I wrote. It is not something to which I alluded, nor is it someting to which I attested.

What I wrote reflects the beginning and end of what I wanted to say and meant. You've surely seen enough of my posts to know damn well that I do not shy from nor am I incapable of providing a full picture of the ideas I aim to express. Nobody has to play "mind reader" with my posts.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

I'm guessing we won’t be hearing any complaints about “separation of powers” from the MSM-Democrats on this one.

 

[jc456]

did he say how it violates the constitution?

Hold on to your panties, the judge's opinion will be published as this story unfolds.

so what are they going to do when they actually hold the funds? haahahahahahaahaha

 

[TNHarley]

Maybe he should have kept his mouth shut instead of making racist remarks about Judge Curiel last year. He was too stupid and somebody should have told him about checks n' balances and separation of power! LOVE IT.
Trump is ******* IMPOTENT.

so you are saying this is all a personal vendetta? Interesting

Idiot.

You've got more gaps going on than those in your post.
I think there could be a little payback going on here.
Judges, even on a local level, are arrogant as hell. Worse than surgeons.
So federal district judges think they are gods and will protect their own against pigs like Trump.
And I LIKE IT. I don't care HOW Trump gets taken down, just as long as he does.

So you are completely OK with abuse of power as long as it fits your agenda?
Nice.

 

[Pogo]

Suppose we were under attack by North Korea and an ultra liberal judge blocked Trumps ability to wage war.

This is a MUCH more serious national problem than the just the irresponsible actions of a lone judge. They can and will put us ALL at risk over their agendas.

There needs to be some kind of judicial consensus requiring "X" number if judges from "X" number of various states to halt Executive orders that pose no threat to national security and are in fact necessary to ensure national security.

Allowing one idiot on the bench here and there to stop the President from protecting the nation is a serous risk to national security.

Actually it's the Constitution. Perhaps what you want is a "dictator".
May I recommend North Korea.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Suppose we were under attack by North Korea and an ultra liberal judge blocked Trumps ability to wage war.

This is a MUCH more serious national problem than the just the irresponsible actions of a lone judge. They can and will put us ALL at risk over their agendas.

There needs to be some kind of judicial consensus requiring "X" number if judges from "X" number of various states to halt Executive orders that pose no threat to national security and are in fact necessary to ensure national security.

Allowing one idiot on the bench here and there to stop the President from protecting the nation is a serous risk to national security.

Imagine a federal judge issuing a stay on D-Day in 1944, lol.

These idiots need to be impeached as soon as they make these idiotic asinine rulings.

Sure coulda used one to do that with the bogus Iraq lie.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Scotus will soon be informing those judges that what they are doing is illegal. And the revenge that follows will be epic!

Don't hold your breath. Both of Trump's travel bans are in the toilet, in case you forgot. Oh, you did. You people are like gerbils when it comes to staying focused.

 

[JimBowie1958]

the federal govt LET THEM IN....not the States. If the federal govt did their jobs, the States/cities would not be faced with this predicament?

These local jurisidictions do not get to say '**** you' to federal law simply because a bunc of lunatics in the preceding administration fucked up all over the place.

They still have to obey the gawd damned laws.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Another damn activist judge.

why don't we just make these judges president?

California judge blocks Trump order on sanctuary city money

Like I said throw the city council and Mayor in jail problem solved......