California embodies left-wing misery

[P@triot]

We need to upgrade our energy infrastructure for better, "all electric" performance.

But you can’t because you’ve run up $800 billion in ignorant left-wing debt.

Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful.

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

That’s the United State’s debt clock, you high school dropout. We were specifically talking about California.

This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything. You can’t read. You can’t write. And you can’t follow the discussion.

 

[HenryBHough]

I can! I have never cast a single vote for Donald Trump. Not one.

You must live in a state where there is honest voter registration and illegal aliens can't vote.

 

[P@triot]

A multiplier effect must be as complicated as imaginary numbers for the right wing.

Only failed economic systems (like socialism) need a “multiplier affect”. Capitalism works so well, it doesn’t need government to steal from half the people to “multiply” for the other half (of parasites such as yourself).

 

[danielpalos]

We need to upgrade our energy infrastructure for better, "all electric" performance.

But you can’t because you’ve run up $800 billion in ignorant left-wing debt.

Isn't right wing fantasy wonderful.

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

That’s the United State’s debt clock, you high school dropout. We were specifically talking about California.

This is why nobody takes you seriously about anything. You can’t read. You can’t write. And you can’t follow the discussion.

California does not operate in a vacuum of special pleading for the left, as it does for the right. It is Why nobody should take the Right Wing seriously about any Thing.

 

[danielpalos]

Only failed economic systems (like socialism) need a “multiplier affect”.

Only if you appeal to ignorance. Otherwise, public sector spending is socialism to the extent Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

 

[P@triot]

California does not operate in a vacuum of special pleading for the left...

A. Yes it does

B. Don't try to weasel your way out of this now. You can't read. You can't write. And you can't follow the conversation. You're a low IQ voter.

 

[P@triot]

Otherwise, public sector spending is socialism to the extent Congress commands fiscal policy and the Fed commands monetary policy.

No, my low IQ friend. Public sector spending becomes socialism based on what they are spending money on (it's not socialism if they are spending on defense, it is socialism if they are providing healthcare).

Could you possibly be any dumber? I'm being serious. I feel like your IQ is almost negative because you say some really stupid shit.

 

[danielpalos]

Public sector spending becomes socialism based on what they are spending money on (it's not socialism if they are spending on defense, it is socialism if they are providing healthcare).

Special pleading is why I don't believe you. Why is defense spending not socialism according to you but welfare spending is socialism.

 

[P@triot]

Special pleading is why I don't believe you. Why is defense spending not socialism according to you but welfare spending is socialism.

1. Because defense is a constitutional responsibility of the federal government while welfare is not.

2. And more importantly - defense is a service. I’m receiving something in exchange for my money (defense). Welfare is not. I receive nothing. The person receiving welfare is not performing a service for me in exchange for that money. It is merely transferring wealth from one person to another.

These are basic definitions. You should not need them explained to you.

 

[danielpalos]

Special pleading is why I don't believe you. Why is defense spending not socialism according to you but welfare spending is socialism.

1. Because defense is a constitutional responsibility of the federal government while welfare is not.

2. And more importantly - defense is a service. I’m receiving something in exchange for my money (defense). Welfare is not. I receive nothing. The person receiving welfare is not performing a service for me in exchange for that money. It is merely transferring wealth from one person to another.

These are basic definitions. You should not need them explained to you.

You are simply wrong. Our Welfare clause is General not common or limited by your view of service. Besides, simply circulating capital is all that needs to happen with our general welfare clause, like a rising tide lifting all boats as that form of service to our economy.

 

[P@triot]

Besides, simply circulating capital is all that needs to happen with our general welfare clause, like a rising tide lifting all boats as that form of service to our economy.

You routinely attempt to force words where they don’t belong because you’re on the wrong side of the facts and you know it.

An economy is not a person. It’s an inanimate object. Therefore, nobody can provide a service for the economy.

Second, if you understood even basic economics, you would understand that taking my money and giving it to your lazy and worthless ass, does not make my “boat” lift at all. Not even a little. It sinks my boat as I become the backside of the “rising tide”, where the water evacuated.

Just stop with your nonsense already. Everyone would respect you a lot more if you simply admitted you were a lazy, worthless parasite looking to mooch off of society.

 

[P@triot]

Bwahahaha...the shit-hole state of California strikes again. People (and their businesses) continue to flee that failed state in droves. It is starting to resemble Venezuela.

Kat Von D leaves California over ‘tyrannical government overreach’ | Blaze Media

Kat Von D is relocating to Indiana

www.theblaze.com

 

[P@triot]

Besides, simply circulating capital is all that needs to happen with our general welfare clause, like a rising tide lifting all boats as that form of service to our economy.

By the way, pure capitalism is the rising tide that lifts all boats. Socialism is the drought that leaves every boat stranded and useless.

 

[danielpalos]

By the way, pure capitalism is the rising tide that lifts all boats.

Where does pure Capitalism actually exist since the fall of Mogadishu? Merely having Government means regulated and controlled Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

An economy is not a person. It’s an inanimate object. Therefore, nobody can provide a service for the economy.

It is right wingers who proclaim our general welfare clause is not about individuals. Did you forget your propaganda and rhetoric?

 

[P@triot]

By the way, pure capitalism is the rising tide that lifts all boats.

Where does pure Capitalism actually exist since the fall of Mogadishu? Merely having Government means regulated and controlled Capitalism.

Capitalism isn't the absence of government, you high school dropout

 

[P@triot]

An economy is not a person. It’s an inanimate object. Therefore, nobody can provide a service for the economy.

It is right wingers who proclaim our general welfare clause is not about individuals.

No China troll...right-wingers inform you that the "general welfare" clause is not a power. It defines the responsibility of the federal government within their 18 enumerated powers.

 

[danielpalos]

An economy is not a person. It’s an inanimate object. Therefore, nobody can provide a service for the economy.

It is right wingers who proclaim our general welfare clause is not about individuals.

No China troll...right-wingers inform you that the "general welfare" clause is not a power. It defines the responsibility of the federal government within their 18 enumerated powers.

You are mistaken. Our welfare clause is general and must cover any given contingency in a general, top down manner and fashion. It is a general power to raise monies for the general welfare not the general warfare. And, nobody takes your right wing interpretation of our Constitution seriously since Hoover backtracked on the Republican doctrine.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is no more porn industry in Los Angeles. It was regulated and permitted out of existence.

1. Nobody said it was in Los Angeles. You read what you wanted to see rather than what I wrote.

2. The point (I mentioned Hollywood, South Central, and the porn industry) is that it is in California.

The porn industry was legalized then regulated out of business.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no more porn industry in Los Angeles. It was regulated and permitted out of existence.

1. Nobody said it was in Los Angeles. You read what you wanted to see rather than what I wrote.

2. The point (I mentioned Hollywood, South Central, and the porn industry) is that it is in California.

The porn industry was legalized then regulated out of business.

I can still love and be grateful for modern broadband times due to the porn sector.