California embodies left-wing misery

[task0778]

The problem with the people's republik of California is that politics is based on liberal hypocrisy. Hypocrite California lefties pretend to be outraged about east coast based corporate wealth and the disparity of income while they support the ultimate corporate criminals in the entertainment industry and the decadent display of wealth in H'wood. Is it possible that pot head Jerry Brown is cut from the same mold as NK's fat bellied pig Kim Jung Un and challenging the power of the United States in order to promote some sort of anarchy movement?

The politicians have ruined it all. Look at this:

View attachment 154049

A house very similar to this is texas would cost 60K or less. Here's a 500K home around here.

View attachment 154052

Supply and demand . People want to live in California . Jobs pay more in cali . That's why housing prices are high.

Problem with cheap Texas housing is you have to live around Texans. Lousy schools, uneducated people

Strange isn't it, that so many people are coming TO Texas and leaving FROM California? Middle and Upper-income people too.

 

[The Original Tree]

It is simple income redistribution that favors the wealthiest at the expense of the poor.

Again...the wealthy already have the money (that's why they are "wealthy"). The poor don't have the money (that's why they are "poor"). So a reduction in taxes simply takes less from the wealthy. It allows the wealthy to keep what was already theirs. It's astounding that you don't know the definition of basic words.

The redistribution is no longer paying as much for Government and putting it on the Peoples' tab.

Snowflake....the only reason a "tab" even exists is because of parasites like you. Stop demanding that society provide for you and there won't be a tab.

Congress has the Power to Tax to pay the Peoples' Debt. The Richest don't want to pay for your right wing and alleged and unenumerated wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. They must not be capitally worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Get rid of the federal reserve. You do not have to go back to gold and silver as a backing for dollars quickly. But put the printing of fiat currency in the hands of the United States treasury and owned by the people. So we would have Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Notes. That would save us some coin to start.

I guess I do not understand your point, if you don't back up your currency with gold and silver then what's the difference between Treasury Notes and Federal Reserve Notes? And how does that save us anything?

Seems to me that you need some mechanism to control your monetary policy, times when you need to tighten up and other times when you need more liquidity. How do you do that if we don't have the Fed?

The Federal Reserve Charges The American People Interests and Fees for using their Private Banking Notes.... i.e. Debt Instruments. Every Reserve Note you spend is actually a loan from The Federal Reserve to The American People. It's not actual currency.

No such thing would occur if we were to print Treasury Notes.

 

[task0778]

It is simple income redistribution that favors the wealthiest at the expense of the poor.

Again...the wealthy already have the money (that's why they are "wealthy"). The poor don't have the money (that's why they are "poor"). So a reduction in taxes simply takes less from the wealthy. It allows the wealthy to keep what was already theirs. It's astounding that you don't know the definition of basic words.

The redistribution is no longer paying as much for Government and putting it on the Peoples' tab.

Snowflake....the only reason a "tab" even exists is because of parasites like you. Stop demanding that society provide for you and there won't be a tab.

Congress has the Power to Tax to pay the Peoples' Debt. The Richest don't want to pay for your right wing and alleged and unenumerated wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. They must not be capitally worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Get rid of the federal reserve. You do not have to go back to gold and silver as a backing for dollars quickly. But put the printing of fiat currency in the hands of the United States treasury and owned by the people. So we would have Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Notes. That would save us some coin to start.

I guess I do not understand your point, if you don't back up your currency with gold and silver then what's the difference between Treasury Notes and Federal Reserve Notes? And how does that save us anything?

Seems to me that you need some mechanism to control your monetary policy, times when you need to tighten up and other times when you need more liquidity. How do you do that if we don't have the Fed?

The Federal Reserve Charges The American People Interests and Fees for using their Private Banking Notes.... i.e. Debt Instruments.

No such thing would occur if we were to print Treasury Notes.

Do you realize that whatever income the Fed gets is returned to the US Treasury? And you didn't answer any of my questions.

 

[ph3iron]

The problem with the people's republik of California is that politics is based on liberal hypocrisy. Hypocrite California lefties pretend to be outraged about east coast based corporate wealth and the disparity of income while they support the ultimate corporate criminals in the entertainment industry and the decadent display of wealth in H'wood. Is it possible that pot head Jerry Brown is cut from the same mold as NK's fat bellied pig Kim Jung Un and challenging the power of the United States in order to promote some sort of anarchy movement?

The politicians have ruined it all. Look at this:

View attachment 154049

A house very similar to this is texas would cost 60K or less. Here's a 500K home around here.

View attachment 154052

Supply and demand . People want to live in California . Jobs pay more in cali . That's why housing prices are high.

Problem with cheap Texas housing is you have to live around Texans. Lousy schools, uneducated people

Strange isn't it, that so many people are coming TO Texas and leaving FROM California? Middle and Upper-income people too.

Not really, it's $$

 

[ph3iron]

Again...the wealthy already have the money (that's why they are "wealthy"). The poor don't have the money (that's why they are "poor"). So a reduction in taxes simply takes less from the wealthy. It allows the wealthy to keep what was already theirs. It's astounding that you don't know the definition of basic words.
Snowflake....the only reason a "tab" even exists is because of parasites like you. Stop demanding that society provide for you and there won't be a tab.

Congress has the Power to Tax to pay the Peoples' Debt. The Richest don't want to pay for your right wing and alleged and unenumerated wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. They must not be capitally worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Get rid of the federal reserve. You do not have to go back to gold and silver as a backing for dollars quickly. But put the printing of fiat currency in the hands of the United States treasury and owned by the people. So we would have Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Notes. That would save us some coin to start.

I guess I do not understand your point, if you don't back up your currency with gold and silver then what's the difference between Treasury Notes and Federal Reserve Notes? And how does that save us anything?

Seems to me that you need some mechanism to control your monetary policy, times when you need to tighten up and other times when you need more liquidity. How do you do that if we don't have the Fed?

The Federal Reserve Charges The American People Interests and Fees for using their Private Banking Notes.... i.e. Debt Instruments.

No such thing would occur if we were to print Treasury Notes.

Do you realize that whatever income the Fed gets is returned to the US Treasury? And you didn't answer any of my questions.

Well, as they say, "if you are not smart enough to get a real job, join the military. Great socialist benefits and indoctrination only second to religion"

 

[ph3iron]

It is simple income redistribution that favors the wealthiest at the expense of the poor.

Again...the wealthy already have the money (that's why they are "wealthy"). The poor don't have the money (that's why they are "poor"). So a reduction in taxes simply takes less from the wealthy. It allows the wealthy to keep what was already theirs. It's astounding that you don't know the definition of basic words.

The redistribution is no longer paying as much for Government and putting it on the Peoples' tab.

Snowflake....the only reason a "tab" even exists is because of parasites like you. Stop demanding that society provide for you and there won't be a tab.

Still don't know the def of snowflake I see.
Original proslavery boys.
It's called google

 

[ph3iron]

California is such a shit-hole. Gasoline is $1.89 in the conservative utopia that I am blessed to live in...

View attachment 240518

Do you ever google anything?
I can't help it if you don't have the brains to afford to live in cal?
Note the preponderance of confederate states in the sexual abuse top ten

Louisiana

 

[task0778]

Congress has the Power to Tax to pay the Peoples' Debt. The Richest don't want to pay for your right wing and alleged and unenumerated wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. They must not be capitally worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Get rid of the federal reserve. You do not have to go back to gold and silver as a backing for dollars quickly. But put the printing of fiat currency in the hands of the United States treasury and owned by the people. So we would have Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Notes. That would save us some coin to start.

I guess I do not understand your point, if you don't back up your currency with gold and silver then what's the difference between Treasury Notes and Federal Reserve Notes? And how does that save us anything?

Seems to me that you need some mechanism to control your monetary policy, times when you need to tighten up and other times when you need more liquidity. How do you do that if we don't have the Fed?

The Federal Reserve Charges The American People Interests and Fees for using their Private Banking Notes.... i.e. Debt Instruments.

No such thing would occur if we were to print Treasury Notes.

Do you realize that whatever income the Fed gets is returned to the US Treasury? And you didn't answer any of my questions.

Well, as they say, "if you are not smart enough to get a real job, join the military. Great socialist benefits and indoctrination only second to religion"

Insults and demagoguery will avail you nothing. Apparently you are smart enough to be a total prick but not smart enough to defend what you wrote earlier.

 

[Tax Man]

The true embodiment of misery is texas and the rest of the southern states. Here in California I have true freedom and have a wonderful life in the bay area.

 

[danielpalos]

It is simple income redistribution that favors the wealthiest at the expense of the poor.

Again...the wealthy already have the money (that's why they are "wealthy"). The poor don't have the money (that's why they are "poor"). So a reduction in taxes simply takes less from the wealthy. It allows the wealthy to keep what was already theirs. It's astounding that you don't know the definition of basic words.

The redistribution is no longer paying as much for Government and putting it on the Peoples' tab.

Snowflake....the only reason a "tab" even exists is because of parasites like you. Stop demanding that society provide for you and there won't be a tab.

Congress has the Power to Tax to pay the Peoples' Debt. The Richest don't want to pay for your right wing and alleged and unenumerated wars on the abstractions of crime, drugs, and terror. They must not be capitally worth it under our form of Capitalism.

Get rid of the federal reserve. You do not have to go back to gold and silver as a backing for dollars quickly. But put the printing of fiat currency in the hands of the United States treasury and owned by the people. So we would have Treasury Notes instead of Federal Reserve Notes. That would save us some coin to start.

I guess I do not understand your point, if you don't back up your currency with gold and silver then what's the difference between Treasury Notes and Federal Reserve Notes? And how does that save us anything?

Seems to me that you need some mechanism to control your monetary policy, times when you need to tighten up and other times when you need more liquidity. How do you do that if we don't have the Fed?

The Federal Reserve Charges The American People Interests and Fees for using their Private Banking Notes.... i.e. Debt Instruments. Every Reserve Note you spend is actually a loan from The Federal Reserve to The American People. It's not actual currency.

No such thing would occur if we were to print Treasury Notes.

all talk? tax cut economics is simply financing government not actually producing a better economy.

 

[P@triot]

Simple engineering problems are merely a challenge for the golden State when Eureka is our State motto.

So the left is so inept, they can’t even handle “simple engineering problems”?

 

[danielpalos]

Simple engineering problems are merely a challenge for the golden State when Eureka is our State motto.

So the left is so inept, they can’t even handle “simple engineering problems”?

the right wing is so clueless and so Causeless, they believe anything they say and write. the left is working on good and valid arguments.

 

[P@triot]

the left is working on good and valid arguments.

Oh we know. While the right works on solutions, the left works on arguments (ie propaganda). That is why the right produces prosperity while the left produces poverty.

You continue to defeat your own arguments...

 

[danielpalos]

the left is working on good and valid arguments.

Oh we know. While the right works on solutions, the left works on arguments (ie propaganda). That is why the right produces prosperity while the left produces poverty.

You continue to defeat your own arguments...

What is your opinion regarding raising the minimum wage and abolish rent control?

Along with equal protection of the law for the Poor, in any at-will employment State.

Rent control provides no incentive to upgrade properties for modern times.

 

[P@triot]

What is your opinion regarding raising the minimum wage

We’ve been over this many times. The minimum wage should never be raised. Ever. It should be set at $2.00 per hour and remain there for eternity.

and abolish rent control?

There should be no “rent control”. The government has no right to tell a private citizen running a private business on private property, what they can charge.

 

[danielpalos]

what about raising the minimum so labor can afford market based rents.

 

[P@triot]

what about raising the minimum so labor can afford market based rents.

Rent will come down when labor can’t afford it. Stop advocating for the “supply side” economics you claim to denounce.

 

[initforme]

The problem is people will actually apply for minimum wage jobs. If nobody applied then everyone would win. But it will never happen . That being said minimum wage equals minimum effort.

 

[danielpalos]

what about raising the minimum so labor can afford market based rents.

Rent will come down when labor can’t afford it. Stop advocating for the “supply side” economics you claim to denounce.

how does that engender an upgrading boom?

 

[danielpalos]

The problem is people will actually apply for minimum wage jobs. If nobody applied then everyone would win. But it will never happen . That being said minimum wage equals minimum effort.

California is raising their minimum wage to increase labor force participation.