California Democrat Branch Rejects GOP Invite to Charlie Kirk Vigil Because He Was ‘Fascist’

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
72,168
Reaction score
30,146
Points
2,290
I need only to see the words, "California democrats" to expect the very worst. They never disappoint.

While it could have been an opportunity for democrats to show they're not completely and utterly beyond reasoning with, they decided instead to show they're completely and utterly beyond reasoning with.

They hurled the expected " fascist" slogan which is curious because the loathsome democrats have never identified any "fascist" element of Charlie Kirk's presentation.

For democrats, it's all about their twisted politico- religious ideology of hate, self-hate and exclusion.


The Stanislaus County, California, Democratic Party rejected an invitation from the local Republican Party to attend a vigil Friday honoring the memory of Charlie Kirk because, its leader explained, Charlie Kirk was a “fascist.”
 
As Kirk was a fascist, what's the problem? The manner of someone's death doesn't erase all the disgusting things they did in life.

And no, we're not going to stop identifying right-wing fascists as fascists just because one right-wing fascist shot another right-wing fascist for unrelated reasons.

That is, we reject this thuggish fascist attempt at censorship-by-intimidation by the right, a tactic that just highlights their hardcore fascist nature.

And we laugh at how triggered the fascists get when they can't get their way through threats and intimidation. Fascism only wins if people don't stand up to the fascists, and the fascists know that.

But most importantly, God commands us not to lie. If we said Kirk wasn't fascist, we'd be lying, so we won't do that.
 
As Kirk was a fascist, what's the problem? The manner of someone's death doesn't erase all the disgusting things they did in life.

And no, we're not going to stop identifying right-wing fascists as fascists just because one right-wing fascist shot another right-wing fascist for unrelated reasons.

That is, we reject this thuggish fascist attempt at censorship-by-intimidation by the right, a tactic that just highlights their hardcore fascist nature.

And we laugh at triggered the fascists get when they can't get their way through thuggery. Fascism only wins if people don't stand up to the fascists, and the fascists know that.

But most importantly, God commands us not to lie. If we said Kirk wasn't fascist, we'd be lying, so we won't do that.
I love this - this identifies the idiots who think a person whose entire reason for starting a company was to seek out and openly debate ideas and opinions.
They think that is a fascist.
You can't make up this kind of stupid.
 
As Kirk was a fascist, what's the problem? The manner of someone's death doesn't erase all the disgusting things they did in life.

And no, we're not going to stop identifying right-wing fascists as fascists just because one right-wing fascist shot another right-wing fascist for unrelated reasons.

That is, we reject this thuggish fascist attempt at censorship-by-intimidation by the right, a tactic that just highlights their hardcore fascist nature.

And we laugh at how triggered the fascists get when they can't get their way through threats and intimidation. Fascism only wins if people don't stand up to the fascists, and the fascists know that.

But most importantly, God commands us not to lie. If we said Kirk wasn't fascist, we'd be lying, so we won't do that.

When Dems ask why the right isn't trying to reach across the aisle and find some form of common ground after the tragedy, this is Exhibit A.
 
As Kirk was a fascist, what's the problem? The manner of someone's death doesn't erase all the disgusting things they did in life.

And no, we're not going to stop identifying right-wing fascists as fascists just because one right-wing fascist shot another right-wing fascist for unrelated reasons.

That is, we reject this thuggish fascist attempt at censorship-by-intimidation by the right, a tactic that just highlights their hardcore fascist nature.

And we laugh at how triggered the fascists get when they can't get their way through threats and intimidation. Fascism only wins if people don't stand up to the fascists, and the fascists know that.

But most importantly, God commands us not to lie. If we said Kirk wasn't fascist, we'd be lying, so we won't do that.
As you're a moron, that's the problem.

The "fascist" slogan is getting old, Bunky. What's interesting is that you fascists can't identify why you use the fascist term other than you fascists just cut and paste slogans..
 
As Kirk was a fascist, what's the problem? The manner of someone's death doesn't erase all the disgusting things they did in life.

And no, we're not going to stop identifying right-wing fascists as fascists just because one right-wing fascist shot another right-wing fascist for unrelated reasons.

That is, we reject this thuggish fascist attempt at censorship-by-intimidation by the right, a tactic that just highlights their hardcore fascist nature.

And we laugh at how triggered the fascists get when they can't get their way through threats and intimidation. Fascism only wins if people don't stand up to the fascists, and the fascists know that.

But most importantly, God commands us not to lie. If we said Kirk wasn't fascist, we'd be lying, so we won't do that.
As you're a moron, identify for us any of "the disgusting things he did in life."
 
As you're a moron, that's the problem.

The "fascist" slogan is getting old, Bunky. What's interesting is that you fascists can't identify why you use the fascist term other than you fascists just cut and paste slogans..
They have more - Hitler, Nazi... soon to come Beelzebub, Satan...
 
I understand why the Trump cult is so upset.

It's the telling the simple truth thing. That's a liberal thing.

Trump cultists literally can't comprehend why someone would value the truth over cult propaganda.

You are no liberal.

That label for the left in general has died a cold death.
 
I understand why the Trump cult is so upset.

It's the telling the simple truth thing. That's a liberal thing.

Trump cultists literally can't comprehend why someone would value the truth over cult propaganda.
download.webp
 
I understand why the Trump cult is so upset.

It's the telling the simple truth thing. That's a liberal thing.

Trump cultists literally can't comprehend why someone would value the truth over cult propaganda.
We've seen "It's the telling the simple truth thing. That's a liberal thing."

"The border is secure"

"The best Joe ever"
Do you not understand that Democrat's lies and falsehoods follow them like a bad smell?
 
As you're a moron, identify for us any of "the disgusting things he did in life."
Not a problem. Remember, I'm a liberal, so I can alwaqys back up what I say. And yes, I understand how foreign that concept is to conservatives.

Let's start with this one.

A hardline conservative set out to assassinate Nancy Pelosi, and ended up bashing her husband's head in.

Charlie Kirk joked about it and declared that the assassin-wannabee needed the help of true patriots.

That is, Charlie Kirk endorsed assassinating Democrats.

Do you agree with his position there?

Now, if you want to just imply that you endorse assassinating Democrats, without openly saying that you endorse assassinating Demcorats, do what the other Trump cultists do, and invoke some weirdass cosnpiracy about a gay lover that no one actually believes.
 
You are no liberal.

That label for the left in general has died a cold death.
I would have disagreed with you on this, until after Kirk's assassination.
I realize, there is no effective difference between a crazy radical - than their supporters and apologist. The crazy radical would just be a lone idiot yelling at the sky without them. But with them, he is powerful.
 
Not a problem. Remember, I'm a liberal, so I can alwaqys back up what I say. And yes, I understand how foreign that concept is to conservatives.

Let's start with this one.

A hardline conservative set out to assassinate Nancy Pelosi, and ended up bashing her husband's head in.

Charlie Kirk joked about it and declared that the assassin-wannabee needed the help of true patriots.

That is, Charlie Kirk endorsed assassinating Democrats.

Do you agree with his position there?

Now, if you want to just imply that you endorse assassinating Democrats, without openly saying that you endorse assassinating Demcorats, do what the other Trump cultists do, and invoke some weirdass cosnpiracy about a gay lover that no one actually believes.

You're no liberal, that's patently obvious
 
Do you not understand that Democrat's lies and falsehoods follow them like a bad smell?
How do you function in the real world, given the degree of your brainwashing?

Oh, that's right. Trump cultist. You're too scared to leave the echo chamber. You might meet a minority person.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
15th post
I would have disagreed with you on this, until after Kirk's assassination.
I realize, there is no effective difference between a crazy radical - than their supporters and apologist. The crazy radical would just be a lone idiot yelling at the sky without them. But with them, he is powerful.

Bill Maher is a Liberal. Steven A is a liberal.

Liberals are fans of free speech. That is the basic position for them.
 
I would have disagreed with you on this, until after Kirk's assassination.
So how do all you plan to unradicalize all those very violent conservative bois, given that you all spent so many years radicalizing them into killing?

The monster that you created broke free of your control. How will you get your monster back under control?
 
Back
Top Bottom