CA teacher who voiced Christians views on sexuality resigns after backlash, death threats

[SassyIrishLass]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

Newspaper op eds are about opinions, you'e just upset his opinion goes against your beliefs and this is a major reason kids coming out of schools need safe spaces and are triggered so easily. You all are raising a generation of pussies

Like I said at the beginning of this thread, if he had published his message anywhere else other than the school paper, I would probably defend him. But, because we don't allow religious things to be published by the school paper because it then appears that the school supports one religion over the other.

Shoot, even if it had been at a private school, I might have supported it, because private schools have more leeway in matters like this, but because it was a public school, I can't.

Religion has no business in public schools because everyone has different beliefs.

Oh BS religion can be discussed in public schools, it's a goddamn op ed, get your panties untwisted and stop your bawling

 

[ABikerSailor]

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

Newspaper op eds are about opinions, you'e just upset his opinion goes against your beliefs and this is a major reason kids coming out of schools need safe spaces and are triggered so easily. You all are raising a generation of pussies

Like I said at the beginning of this thread, if he had published his message anywhere else other than the school paper, I would probably defend him. But, because we don't allow religious things to be published by the school paper because it then appears that the school supports one religion over the other.

Shoot, even if it had been at a private school, I might have supported it, because private schools have more leeway in matters like this, but because it was a public school, I can't.

Religion has no business in public schools because everyone has different beliefs.

Oh BS religion can be discussed in public schools, it's a goddamn op ed, get your panties untwisted and stop your bawling

Here's when religion can be allowed in schools, and an op ed in the school paper isn't one of them................

Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools

Official Participation or Encouragement
of Religious Activity
4. Teachers and school administrators, when acting in those capacities, are representatives of the state, and, in those capacities, are themselves prohibited from encouraging or soliciting student religious or anti-religious activity. Similarly, when acting in their official capacities, teachers may not engage in religious activities with their students. However, teachers may engage in private religious activity in faculty lounges.


Teaching About Religion
5. Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not teach religion. As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly said, "t might well be said that one's education is not complete without a study of comparative religion, or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization." It would be difficult to teach art, music, literature and most social studies without considering religious influences.

The history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature (either as a separate course or within some other existing course), are all permissible public school subjects. It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries. One can teach that the Pilgrims came to this country with a particular religious vision, that Catholics and others have been subject to persecution or that many of those participating in the abolitionist, women's suffrage and civil rights movements had religious motivations.

6. These same rules apply to the recurring controversy surrounding theories of evolution. Schools may teach about explanations of life on earth, including religious ones (such as "creationism"), in comparative religion or social studies classes. In science class, however, they may present only genuinely scientific critiques of, or evidence for, any explanation of life on earth, but not religious critiques (beliefs unverifiable by scientific methodology). Schools may not refuse to teach evolutionary theory in order to avoid giving offense to religion nor may they circumvent these rules by labeling as science an article of religious faith. Public schools must not teach as scientific fact or theory any religious doctrine, including "creationism," although any genuinely scientific evidence for or against any explanation of life may be taught. Just as they may neither advance nor inhibit any religious doctrine, teachers should not ridicule, for example, a student's religious explanation for life on earth.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

Newspaper op eds are about opinions, you'e just upset his opinion goes against your beliefs and this is a major reason kids coming out of schools need safe spaces and are triggered so easily. You all are raising a generation of pussies

Like I said at the beginning of this thread, if he had published his message anywhere else other than the school paper, I would probably defend him. But, because we don't allow religious things to be published by the school paper because it then appears that the school supports one religion over the other.

Shoot, even if it had been at a private school, I might have supported it, because private schools have more leeway in matters like this, but because it was a public school, I can't.

Religion has no business in public schools because everyone has different beliefs.

Oh BS religion can be discussed in public schools, it's a goddamn op ed, get your panties untwisted and stop your bawling

Here's when religion can be allowed in schools, and an op ed in the school paper isn't one of them................

Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools

Official Participation or Encouragement
of Religious Activity
4. Teachers and school administrators, when acting in those capacities, are representatives of the state, and, in those capacities, are themselves prohibited from encouraging or soliciting student religious or anti-religious activity. Similarly, when acting in their official capacities, teachers may not engage in religious activities with their students. However, teachers may engage in private religious activity in faculty lounges.


Teaching About Religion
5. Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not teach religion. As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly said, "t might well be said that one's education is not complete without a study of comparative religion, or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization." It would be difficult to teach art, music, literature and most social studies without considering religious influences.

The history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature (either as a separate course or within some other existing course), are all permissible public school subjects. It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries. One can teach that the Pilgrims came to this country with a particular religious vision, that Catholics and others have been subject to persecution or that many of those participating in the abolitionist, women's suffrage and civil rights movements had religious motivations.

6. These same rules apply to the recurring controversy surrounding theories of evolution. Schools may teach about explanations of life on earth, including religious ones (such as "creationism"), in comparative religion or social studies classes. In science class, however, they may present only genuinely scientific critiques of, or evidence for, any explanation of life on earth, but not religious critiques (beliefs unverifiable by scientific methodology). Schools may not refuse to teach evolutionary theory in order to avoid giving offense to religion nor may they circumvent these rules by labeling as science an article of religious faith. Public schools must not teach as scientific fact or theory any religious doctrine, including "creationism," although any genuinely scientific evidence for or against any explanation of life may be taught. Just as they may neither advance nor inhibit any religious doctrine, teachers should not ridicule, for example, a student's religious explanation for life on earth.

Oh boo ******* hoo...an op ed with religious content has your panties in a wad. Get the **** over it, be a man for once

 

[ABikerSailor]

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

Newspaper op eds are about opinions, you'e just upset his opinion goes against your beliefs and this is a major reason kids coming out of schools need safe spaces and are triggered so easily. You all are raising a generation of pussies

Like I said at the beginning of this thread, if he had published his message anywhere else other than the school paper, I would probably defend him. But, because we don't allow religious things to be published by the school paper because it then appears that the school supports one religion over the other.

Shoot, even if it had been at a private school, I might have supported it, because private schools have more leeway in matters like this, but because it was a public school, I can't.

Religion has no business in public schools because everyone has different beliefs.

Oh BS religion can be discussed in public schools, it's a goddamn op ed, get your panties untwisted and stop your bawling

Here's when religion can be allowed in schools, and an op ed in the school paper isn't one of them................

Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools

Official Participation or Encouragement
of Religious Activity
4. Teachers and school administrators, when acting in those capacities, are representatives of the state, and, in those capacities, are themselves prohibited from encouraging or soliciting student religious or anti-religious activity. Similarly, when acting in their official capacities, teachers may not engage in religious activities with their students. However, teachers may engage in private religious activity in faculty lounges.


Teaching About Religion
5. Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not teach religion. As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly said, "t might well be said that one's education is not complete without a study of comparative religion, or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization." It would be difficult to teach art, music, literature and most social studies without considering religious influences.

The history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature (either as a separate course or within some other existing course), are all permissible public school subjects. It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries. One can teach that the Pilgrims came to this country with a particular religious vision, that Catholics and others have been subject to persecution or that many of those participating in the abolitionist, women's suffrage and civil rights movements had religious motivations.

6. These same rules apply to the recurring controversy surrounding theories of evolution. Schools may teach about explanations of life on earth, including religious ones (such as "creationism"), in comparative religion or social studies classes. In science class, however, they may present only genuinely scientific critiques of, or evidence for, any explanation of life on earth, but not religious critiques (beliefs unverifiable by scientific methodology). Schools may not refuse to teach evolutionary theory in order to avoid giving offense to religion nor may they circumvent these rules by labeling as science an article of religious faith. Public schools must not teach as scientific fact or theory any religious doctrine, including "creationism," although any genuinely scientific evidence for or against any explanation of life may be taught. Just as they may neither advance nor inhibit any religious doctrine, teachers should not ridicule, for example, a student's religious explanation for life on earth.

Oh boo ******* hoo...an op ed with religious content has your panties in a wad. Get the **** over it, be a man for once

Like I said, I would be defending this guy if he'd printed it anywhere else other than public schools. Promoting one religion over another in a public school is against the law because it is a public school and everyone there believes different. And, by the teacher printing this in the school paper, that is exactly what he did, and by the school allowing it in the paper, it looks like they support Christianity over other religions.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Newspaper op eds are about opinions, you'e just upset his opinion goes against your beliefs and this is a major reason kids coming out of schools need safe spaces and are triggered so easily. You all are raising a generation of pussies

Like I said at the beginning of this thread, if he had published his message anywhere else other than the school paper, I would probably defend him. But, because we don't allow religious things to be published by the school paper because it then appears that the school supports one religion over the other.

Shoot, even if it had been at a private school, I might have supported it, because private schools have more leeway in matters like this, but because it was a public school, I can't.

Religion has no business in public schools because everyone has different beliefs.

Oh BS religion can be discussed in public schools, it's a goddamn op ed, get your panties untwisted and stop your bawling

Here's when religion can be allowed in schools, and an op ed in the school paper isn't one of them................

Joint Statement of Current Law on Religion in the Public Schools

Official Participation or Encouragement
of Religious Activity
4. Teachers and school administrators, when acting in those capacities, are representatives of the state, and, in those capacities, are themselves prohibited from encouraging or soliciting student religious or anti-religious activity. Similarly, when acting in their official capacities, teachers may not engage in religious activities with their students. However, teachers may engage in private religious activity in faculty lounges.


Teaching About Religion
5. Students may be taught about religion, but public schools may not teach religion. As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly said, "t might well be said that one's education is not complete without a study of comparative religion, or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization." It would be difficult to teach art, music, literature and most social studies without considering religious influences.

The history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature (either as a separate course or within some other existing course), are all permissible public school subjects. It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries. One can teach that the Pilgrims came to this country with a particular religious vision, that Catholics and others have been subject to persecution or that many of those participating in the abolitionist, women's suffrage and civil rights movements had religious motivations.

6. These same rules apply to the recurring controversy surrounding theories of evolution. Schools may teach about explanations of life on earth, including religious ones (such as "creationism"), in comparative religion or social studies classes. In science class, however, they may present only genuinely scientific critiques of, or evidence for, any explanation of life on earth, but not religious critiques (beliefs unverifiable by scientific methodology). Schools may not refuse to teach evolutionary theory in order to avoid giving offense to religion nor may they circumvent these rules by labeling as science an article of religious faith. Public schools must not teach as scientific fact or theory any religious doctrine, including "creationism," although any genuinely scientific evidence for or against any explanation of life may be taught. Just as they may neither advance nor inhibit any religious doctrine, teachers should not ridicule, for example, a student's religious explanation for life on earth.

Oh boo ******* hoo...an op ed with religious content has your panties in a wad. Get the **** over it, be a man for once

Like I said, I would be defending this guy if he'd printed it anywhere else other than public schools. Promoting one religion over another in a public school is against the law because it is a public school and everyone there believes different. And, by the teacher printing this in the school paper, that is exactly what he did, and by the school allowing it in the paper, it looks like they support Christianity over other religions.

Blah blah blah it was his opinion in an op ed, he wasn't teaching it and the law allows him to talk about it. Even the school wasn't going to punish him and said they encourage First Amendment rights.

The damn queers are the ones making the ruckus...which leads me to this, why are YOU making a ruckus? Hmmmmm?

 

[featherlite]

A high school teacher ( Christian or not) shouldn't be singling out a group who "deserves to die". If hes going to talk about the end result of sin he should include all. That would be more truthful
“became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate, envy, murder, quarreling, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip.”
“They know God’s justice required that those who do these things deserve to die, yet they do them anyway,” the passage continues. ect ect...

My God if a Muslim taught a sex ed class and taught something similar...people ( myself included) would go ballistic.

Public school stick to biology, protection from STDs and unwanted pregnancy.
edit...thought this was another story I heard of.
He wrote biblical truth...just read it.
... what if a Muslim had written that???

 

[baileyn45]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

 

[sealybobo]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

 

[sealybobo]

Can a Muslim gym teacher make the girls wear Muslim garbs in the pool?

 

[guno]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

END TIME HEADLINES?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

**** what Allah says

 

[guno]

Actually, he wrote a sermon in the SCHOOL NEWSPAPER and he even said that gays should be killed. Now, saying gays should be killed is bad enough, but isn't there something about not promoting one religion over another in public schools?

Here is a local news article that goes more into depth on what happened.

SLO High teacher resigns, receives death threat over anti-gay letter

Quoting Romans 1:16-32 is not calling for homosexuals to be killed, moron.

keep you goyim bible to yourselves

 

[guno]

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

**** what Allah says

you tell em bi catfish!

 

[guno]

Here is the full first chapter of Romans

Romans 1New International Version (NIV)

1 Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle and set apart for the gospel of God— 2 the gospel he promised beforehand through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures 3 regarding his Son, who as to his earthly life[a] was a descendant of David, 4 and who through the Spirit of holiness was appointed the Son of God in power by his resurrection from the dead: Jesus Christ our Lord. 5 Through him we received grace and apostleship to call all the Gentiles to the obedience that comes from[c] faith for his name’s sake. 6 And you also are among those Gentiles who are called to belong to Jesus Christ.

7 To all in Rome who are loved by God and called to be his holy people:

Grace and peace to you from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul’s Longing to Visit Rome
8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for all of you, because your faith is being reported all over the world. 9 God, whom I serve in my spirit in preaching the gospel of his Son, is my witness how constantly I remember you 10 in my prayers at all times; and I pray that now at last by God’s will the way may be opened for me to come to you.

11 I long to see you so that I may impart to you some spiritual gift to make you strong— 12 that is, that you and I may be mutually encouraged by each other’s faith. 13 I do not want you to be unaware, brothers and sisters,[d] that I planned many times to come to you (but have been prevented from doing so until now) in order that I might have a harvest among you, just as I have had among the other Gentiles.

14 I am obligated both to Greeks and non-Greeks, both to the wise and the foolish. 15 That is why I am so eager to preach the gospel also to you who are in Rome.

16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile. 17 For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed—a righteousness that is by faith from first to last,[e] just as it is written: “The righteous will live by faith.”[f]

God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity
18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.


That does not advocate putting faggots to death, it is an acknowledgement of many societies of that time and the traditional Jewish view of homosexuality. Paul meant it in context of a spiritual death and it is that death he tangles with over the first two chapters, not civic law.

You're wasting your time. They don't understand the Bible but continually try and use it to their advantage

Shore am glad you don't do that.

Yeah it's like I've had to explain Mosaic Law, Old and New Covenants to you loons at least a hundred times and you all STILL scream bbbbuuutt you eat shellfish!!!!!!!

Morons

a dumb goy teaching others about Torah?

 

[sealybobo]

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

**** what Allah says

Or jesus

 

[deanrd]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

Here is a short list of Christian Pastors who call for the execution of gays. Most of them have sermons on Youtube.


Pastor Roger Jimenez
Pastor Steven Anderson
Pastor Kevin Swanson
Pastor Jesse Price
Pastor Charles L. Worley
Pastor Bert Farias
Pastor Jeffrey S. Smith

 

[baileyn45]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

Well there you go if it wasn't in school, who cares. The teacher in question wasn't proselytizing in school it was an op ed. For this he received death threats. I have no doubt that the school would have also allowed a muslim teacher to espouse his views on gays in an op ed. The difference is those on the left would have rallied around said teacher in the name of diversity.

 

[baileyn45]

A California high school teacher has willingly resigned after receiving intense backlash over his Christian views on sexuality. Michael Stack taught special education at San Luis Obispo High School before a letter he wrote to the school newspaper sparked outrage among students, LifeSite News reported. Last month, Stack wrote a letter to the editor of the online student newspaper, Expressions, regarding the May issue, which focused on LGBT topics and featured a photo of

CA Teacher Who Voiced Christian Views on Sexuality Resigns After Backlash, Death Threats
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's the way the ball bounces, so just deal with it . The tolerant peaceful left picking up the ISIS way so peaceful and caring what a bunch of loser hypocrites. They can't eat themselves alive soon enough

Here is a short list of Christian Pastors who call for the execution of gays. Most of them have sermons on Youtube.


Pastor Roger Jimenez
Pastor Steven Anderson
Pastor Kevin Swanson
Pastor Jesse Price
Pastor Charles L. Worley
Pastor Bert Farias
Pastor Jeffrey S. Smith

These people are idiots. If they were muslim the left would be celebrating them as evidence as how wonderfully multicultural the left is.

 

[sealybobo]

This little 8 year old girl came home crying. Her and her class went swimming. All the girls and the teacher were Muslims and the girls wore Muslim swimwear. She was crying because the teacher told the class what the Koran says about modesty and now she won't go swimming because they body shamed her.

Teachers need to leave their weird religious beliefs at home

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

Well there you go if it wasn't in school, who cares. The teacher in question wasn't proselytizing in school it was an op ed. For this he received death threats. I have no doubt that the school would have also allowed a muslim teacher to espouse his views on gays in an op ed. The difference is those on the left would have rallied around said teacher in the name of diversity.

I do see our hypocricy there.

On the other hand, I don't go to Facebook because I know anything bad I say there could be held against me with an employer. For that this teacher is an idiot.

But I agree they wouldn't fire a Muslim. That'd be politically incorrect. The worry they'd be sued by the ACLU.

I wouldn't take the chance with my job and I don't work with kids.

We want schools to have the power to let bad teachers go. She sounds horrible

 

[baileyn45]

You folks seem to miss the point, this wasn't curriculum, it was basically an oped in a newspaper. Nowhere do they say he discussed this in class.

To be equivalent to your example he would have had to humiliate a gay child in class.

Doesn't matter. It was still an op ed in a PUBLIC SCHOOL NEWSPAPER. By the school allowing that to be published in their official school newspaper, it kinda looks like the school is supporting one religion over another. And that is a no no in a public school.

I agree that the teaching of any religion should be kept out of school, an op ed, by definition 778677an expression of a personal belief, is not teaching religion. Humiliating a child because she is not dressed according to the edicts of a religion at a school function is a whole different situation.

It's a true story only it wasn't a Muslim teacher it was a birthday party. The mom's chastized my sister in law and the little girls body shamed her daughter.

But it illustrates to Christians how they wouldn't like it if another religion was shoving their values in their face. Not fun when you're the minority. That's why people should keep their opinions to themselves.

And in a way it's true. Look at how Americans act. Remember Jon bonet Ramsey? Little girls wearing two piece bikinis? No modesty. And look at our unwed teen birth rates. Allah says...lol

Well there you go if it wasn't in school, who cares. The teacher in question wasn't proselytizing in school it was an op ed. For this he received death threats. I have no doubt that the school would have also allowed a muslim teacher to espouse his views on gays in an op ed. The difference is those on the left would have rallied around said teacher in the name of diversity.

I do see our hypocricy there.

On the other hand, I don't go to Facebook because I know anything bad I say there could be held against me with an employer. For that this teacher is an idiot.

But I agree they wouldn't fire a Muslim. That'd be politically incorrect. The worry they'd be sued by the ACLU.

I wouldn't take the chance with my job and I don't work with kids.

We want schools to have the power to let bad teachers go. She sounds horrible

I agree with that, I would never defend what the teacher said and employers have every right to judge potential employees on their public statements. It's the hypocrisy end of it that drives me nuts. The left is full of it. And most of the time I don't particularly care about many of the issues that the left's hypocrisy rears it's head over, it's the absolute abandonment of rational thought in order to further their hypocrisy.