PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #161
Your history of economic theory does not name a single economist (unless you count Marx, which I would not), mention any economic theory, and apparently ends at 1880. It would also be more readable if you made it more definite who you were quoting (an unintended consequence of cut-and-paste?)
I actually had to read 2,000 or so pages of Joseph Schumpeter's magnus opus (History of Economic Analysis) in graduate school. Mercifully he died with it not completed and his wife spent three years editing it for publication. Given his politics as well as his economics, he would be right up your alley. nd he really was an Austrian Economist; he served as finance minister of Austria in 1919!
" It would also be more readable if you made it more definite who you were quoting..."
Clean off your specs....
....this was at the very top:
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006
https://www.hillsdale.edu/news/impri...=2007&month=05
I saw that. Is Father Sirico quoting Marx, Babeauf and Oscar Wilde? Why do you use quotation marks for some of the numbered points and not others? Please be consistent; I hate being thrust into the role of style-guide police.
"Why do you use quotation marks for some of the numbered points and not others? Please be consistent;"
The quotation marks are used correctly.
I recommend that you purchase the following:
"A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, Seventh Edition: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers" (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing) [Paperback]
Kate L. Turabian (Author), Wayne C. Booth (Editor), Gregory G. Colomb (Editor), Joseph M. Williams (Editor), University of Chicago Press Staff (Editor)
$10.23 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
at Amazon. com
Last edited: