Bull shit.
Cilton kept us safe during his whole term.
Bush didnt.
911 happened 8 months into Bush's term dude , He owns that attack.
There were people all over the gov trying to get him to pay attention to AQ. He told them to stop talking about it because it was a Clinton deal.
Bush let us be attacked and Clinton stopped attacks
ok... I hear your discontent and I feel your passion...
Clearly you're a person with a deep, innate understanding of Clinton policy; particularly Clinton Policy which prevented Marxist Islam from attacking the US, her interests and allies...
Would you be so kind as to lay out for the room, the specific Clinton policy initiatives wherein you feel that Clinton Policy really exemplified exuberence in jealously defending the US, her interests and allies from a well organized, well funded and well capable cadre of religious and political zealots?
We will now
NOT be treated to
ANY examples of that which is being requested... Now 'how', you may ask, 'can you know that?"
Great question... I know it, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO SUCH EXAMPLES... Clinton, like every other left-thinker, believes that the US has an unfair advantage, in general... thus where there is a means to rationalize a doubt, he grants such to the enemies of the US.
Clinton demanded that terrorism was a function of criminality... IGNORING THE IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE SO OBVIOSULY BEING ADVANCED... AND TO PROVE HIS COMPLICITY, HE ALLOWED HIS ADMINISTRATION TO BUILD ENCUMBERENCES INTO THE US LEGAL
AND NATIONAL DEFENSE SYSTEM, WHICH MADE IT NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR DOMESTIC LAW ENFORCEMENT TO SHARE INFORMATION WITH US INTELLIGENCE.
So there is no Clinton policy which jealously defends US interests against Islamic terrorism... to the contrary, Clinton stripped US intelligence of essential tools it needed to infiltrate terrorist netowrks. He specifically forbid the CIA from hiring operatives with criminal histories... Now understand that Clinton's policy was to PROSECUTE Terrorists as CRIMINALS... Violators of US legal code... To THEN implement a policy which forbids your intelligence agency from hiring criminals as intelligence assets, in their pursuit of what
HE DECLARED TO BE CRIMINALS, is pretty ******* STUPID... IF IT'S NOT BY DESIGN; if one is not complicit in their desire to harm the US.
It would be the same thing if GW Bush declared the US to be at WAR WITH TERRORISTS (which he did...) and then established policy which forbid the CIA from hiring those with TERRORIST BACKGROUNDS in their effort to infiltrate terrorists organizations (which he DID NOT)...
Clinton was complicit with Islamic Terrorism... and it cost us 9-11 and the GWOT.... Bush, in stark contrast, established overt policy to seek out, close with and destroy our terrorist enemies... which set Islamic terrorism on it's ass... President Hussein now comes to power and is giving us lots of juicy examples of his tendency to returning US policy to the days where the US Federal Government, tasked with our common defense gives our enemies
'the benefit of the doubt'... the only question that remains is what price
his complicity will bring.
I expect it will be a very high price indeed; potentially ruinous and not the phoney baloney 'ruin' that President Hussein and his MArxist sychophants in congress are harping regarding the economy... but the ruin of the very tangible variety; where cities are smoldering and millions are vaporized; where leftists stand around openly wondering aloud: "How could this have happened? Whose to blame?"