EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,995
- 18,279
- 2,788
We are seeing both as we post
We are not.
No breakout in canes.
No warming.
We see NEITHER....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are seeing both as we post
Of course you don't need to. Like all the other denialists, you are not going to look at any evidence that contradicts your denialist viewpoint. Yes, this interglacial is much different than the other interglacials. For one thing, we know exactly how much CO2 and CH4 was in the atmosphere during those interglacials because of the ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica. During the Eemian interglacial, the last one, the CO2 level was only about 300 ppm. And the CH4 level was about 720 ppb. Today the CO2 is about 420 ppm, and CH4 above 1900 ppb. In the Eemian with those levels of GHGs, the sea level was 6 to 9 meters above present. The reason we do not have those sea levels at present is that the melting of the ice and warming of the oceans takes time. However, we are observing record rises in ocean water temperatures, and an acceleration of the rise in sea levels.Don’t need to. Do you suppose it was any different in the previous interglacial period?
I am not a geologist. I am a person with a strong interest in geology, and an extensive library supporting that interest. And the floods are not just in a tiny area. Were you not such a liar, you would post evidence for the floods only being in a tiny area.This is how poor a thinker this alleged Geologist is when he moans over a couple floods in a tiny area of the planet while the long-term trends don't support the dumb Warmest/alarmist propaganda.
You see nothing at all when you are purposely blind to what is happening all over the world.
Your anal tampon is falling out over current levels, so you either don't know the earths historical climate data, or you do but your brain can't comprehend it. Please tell me what I am denying?Not only are they aware and experts in that data, clearly you are not. The experts predicted accelerated warming and increased extreme climate events. We are seeing both as we post. In the meantime, you and the other denialists are still telling lies and making fools of yourselves.
All of this;
All of this;
So glad you recognize it was warmer back then with less GHG’s.Of course you don't need to. Like all the other denialists, you are not going to look at any evidence that contradicts your denialist viewpoint. Yes, this interglacial is much different than the other interglacials. For one thing, we know exactly how much CO2 and CH4 was in the atmosphere during those interglacials because of the ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica. During the Eemian interglacial, the last one, the CO2 level was only about 300 ppm. And the CH4 level was about 720 ppb. Today the CO2 is about 420 ppm, and CH4 above 1900 ppb. In the Eemian with those levels of GHGs, the sea level was 6 to 9 meters above present. The reason we do not have those sea levels at present is that the melting of the ice and warming of the oceans takes time. However, we are observing record rises in ocean water temperatures, and an acceleration of the rise in sea levels.
All of this;
I am not a geologist. I am a person with a strong interest in geology, and an extensive library supporting that interest. And the floods are not just in a tiny area. Were you not such a liar, you would post evidence for the floods only being in a tiny area.
Increase in damaging floods worldwide
The increase in damaging floods worldwide is a significant concern, with the UN World Meteorological Organization (WMO) highlighting the need for faster and wider warnings. The frequency and intensity of flash floods are increasing due to rapid urbanization, land-use change, and climate change. Each additional degree Celsius of warming allows the air to hold about 7% more water vapor, increasing the risk of extreme rainfall events. This trend is also reflected in glacier-related flood hazards, which are increasing due to enhanced ice melting in a warmer climate.
Naciones Unidas+1
The impact of climate change on flood risk is evident, with projections indicating a 9% increase in median flood hazard by 2050 under the optimistic low emissions scenario SSP1-2.6, and a 49% increase by the end of the century under the pessimistic high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5. Coastal flooding is projected to increase by 99% by 2100, with the largest increases found around global coastlines and in tropical Africa and Asia.
wmo.int
These findings underscore the urgent need for improved flood warning systems and climate adaptation strategies to mitigate the increasing risks of flooding and protect vulnerable communities.
Naciones Unidas+2
Naciones Unidas
Deadly floods show need for faster, wider warnings, UN agency says
fathom.global
Global Flooding To Increase 9%-49% This Century | Fathom
View all
Naciones Unidas
Deadly floods show need for faster, wider warnings, UN agency says
From the Himalayas to rural Texas, deadly floods this month have killed hundreds and exposed dangerous gaps in early warning systems, the UN’s weather agency warned, linking the de…
https://news.un.org › en › story
fathom.global
Global Flooding To Increase 9%-49% This Century | Fathom
Pioneering new research into the creation of the most comprehensive flood mapping framework to date highlights the impact of climate change on flood risk around the globe. A trailb…
https://www.fathom.global › newsroom › new-study-reveals-global-flooding-increase
Ah well, until you are sitting on your roof, watching the water running over your gutters you will continue to lie and be in denial of reality. But for many people in our nation and around the world, this has already been a reality.