saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,760
- 10,853
- 2,030
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whose administration was in charge when the economic crisis began? Who bailed out the banks and wall street? Who dispursed the first round of TARP money?
Someone answer those questions please.
Whose administration was in charge when the economic crisis began? Who bailed out the banks and wall street? Who dispursed the first round of TARP money?
Someone answer those questions please.
Keep banging the Boooooosh drum because it makes Dems look weak and ineffectual.
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
I do and was....For all the good it did.Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You mean like while the Republic wing of the Insiders' Party was conducting the wars in AFghanistan and Iraq entirely off budget?
Yeah I agree it's total failure.
Do you agree it was total failure when Bush II did it?
Or weren't you paying attention to your government pissing away billions, back then?
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You mean like while the Republic wing of the Insiders' Party was conducting the wars in AFghanistan and Iraq entirely off budget?
Yeah I agree it's total failure.
Do you agree it was total failure when Bush II did it?
Or weren't you paying attention to your government pissing away billions, back then?
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You mean like while the Republic wing of the Insiders' Party was conducting the wars in AFghanistan and Iraq entirely off budget?
Yeah I agree it's total failure.
Do you agree it was total failure when Bush II did it?
Or weren't you paying attention to your government pissing away billions, back then?
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You guys know that wasn't serious news right? It was a paid ad.
We still have a budget, it hasn't actually been canceled.
There's always a way to attain a balanced budget. Who didn't know this rhetoric wasn't coming?This is news? What kind of budgeting is it where the deficit is greater than the income?
Agreed.
More evidence of the sham?
What kind of budgeting is it when we can conducted two land wars in Asia OFF the budget?
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You guys know that wasn't serious news right? It was a paid ad.
We still have a budget, it hasn't actually been canceled.
...am I the only one who finds it incredibly ironic that this clip sponsored by House republicans is championing fiscal conservatism, a scant few years after being ousted after several years of increasing the budget in a Congress where they had the majority?
Should I really believe them, and blame Obama and the Democrats when neither party seems to actually practice what they preach?
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You guys know that wasn't serious news right? It was a paid ad.
We still have a budget, it hasn't actually been canceled.
Obama's FY 2011 Budget
The Obama Administration released its FY2011 Budget proposals today which assumes a substantial amount of tax cuts (making the 2001-2003 Bush cuts permanent for most Americans costs about $3.75 trillion over ten years) and some tax increases to cover important programs (about $1.9 trillion), resulting in a substantial net tax cut of almost $2 trillion over ten years.
ataxingmatter: Obama's FY 2011 Budget
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OBAMA...TAX CUTS DURING 2 WARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! EMBRACING BUSH'S POLICIES ..... EVEN TAX CUTS!!!!!! WHAT A BUSHIE!!!!!!!
Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You guys know that wasn't serious news right? It was a paid ad.
We still have a budget, it hasn't actually been canceled.
Ask questions and do research before inserting foot in mouth. 2011 the year of no budget.
...am I the only one who finds it incredibly ironic that this clip sponsored by House republicans is championing fiscal conservatism, a scant few years after being ousted after several years of increasing the budget in a Congress where they had the majority?
Should I really believe them, and blame Obama and the Democrats when neither party seems to actually practice what they preach?
I find it incredibly ironic that YOU seem to have forgotten that the Dems had control of Congress for the last two years of Bush's presidency. Congress controlls the purse strings, not the Prez.
I also find it ironic that you seem to have forgotten that the Dems AND the Reps were all spending like drunken sailors for eight years.
Both parties are responsible for the mess we are in not matter how much both parties try to say differently.
Reagan's budget canceled the Department of Education...how'd that work out?
I do and was....For all the good it did.Not having a budget just points to the total failure the Democratic Congress has become. You are not in position to solve fical issues if you can't even acknowledge their costs.
You mean like while the Republic wing of the Insiders' Party was conducting the wars in AFghanistan and Iraq entirely off budget?
Yeah I agree it's total failure.
Do you agree it was total failure when Bush II did it?
Or weren't you paying attention to your government pissing away billions, back then?
Still, that doesn't excuse the democratics for heading for the tall grass today.
Presidents don't make budgets. Congress does. Glad the President has a budget. What is he spending on groceries?
Presidents don't make budgets. Congress does. Glad the President has a budget. What is he spending on groceries?
This is true, but it's more of an indication that there will be a 2011 budget (why the devil wouldn't there? No one in politics is a big enough idiot to not know the country can't run without any cash), than of the opposite. The only indication we have that there won't be is a paid ad meant to make one side look good, and the other bad. And that's hardly indicative or credible evidence to begin with.
Dems won?t pass budget in 2010 - TheHill.comHouse Democrats will not pass a budget blueprint in 2010, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) will confirm in a speech on Tuesday.
...
“It isn’t possible to debate and pass a realistic, long-term budget until we’ve considered the bipartisan commission’s deficit-reduction plan, which is expected in December,” according to Hoyer’s prepared remarks that were provided to The Hill.
...
The House will put forth a “budget enforcement resolution” rather than a budget blueprint that looks beyond next year and calculates five or 10 years’ worth of deficit figures.