Bruce Springsteen Releases New Song: “Streets of Minneapolis”

citygator

There is a 25% Tariff to read my posts
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
31,202
Reaction score
25,421
Points
2,790
Location
Charlotte
Bruce Springsteen wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. He said it’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, their innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

“King Trump's private army from the DHS / Guns belted to their coats / Came to Minneapolis to enforce the law / Or so their story goes,” Springsteen sings. “And there were bloody footprints / Where mercy should have stood / And two dead, left to die on snow-filled streets / Alex Pretti and Renee Good.”

Has the classic Bruce sound and passion.

 
Springsteen is heartless.
Why hasn't Springsteen written a song for all of innocent American citizens who have been murdered by the Democrat Party's illegal alien criminals?

1769663527186.webp


1769663552990.webp


1769663623393.webp
 
Springsteen is heartless.
Why hasn't Springsteen written a song for all of innocent American citizens who have been murdered by the Democrat Party's illegal alien criminals?

View attachment 1212383

View attachment 1212384

View attachment 1212385

Because just letting in illegal aliens doesn't automatically mean people are going to be killed. The US is a VIOLENT PLACE.

You're not interested in reducing the violence, just reducing the violence of illegals by kicking out all the illegals who aren't violent.

You're trying to play the hypocrisy card, and yet you fall into the same trap.
 
Because just letting in illegal aliens doesn't automatically mean people are going to be killed. The US is a VIOLENT PLACE.

You're not interested in reducing the violence, just reducing the violence of illegals by kicking out all the illegals who aren't violent.

You're trying to play the hypocrisy card, and yet you fall into the same trap.
So the US needs more murders when the country already has a murder problem?
 
Because just letting in illegal aliens doesn't automatically mean people are going to be killed. The US is a VIOLENT PLACE.

You're not interested in reducing the violence, just reducing the violence of illegals by kicking out all the illegals who aren't violent.

You're trying to play the hypocrisy card, and yet you fall into the same trap.
Democrats are the party of violence
 
So the US needs more murders when the country already has a murder problem?

If you want this to be about reducing murders, we can talk about reducing murders in the US. Making the US a safer place.

Is that what you want this topic to be about?

Or, if you want to talk about bad government going around killing people, we can talk about that?

Is that what you want this topic to be about?
 
If you want this to be about reducing murders, we can talk about reducing murders in the US. Making the US a safer place.

Is that what you want this topic to be about?

Or, if you want to talk about bad government going around killing people, we can talk about that?

Is that what you want this topic to be about?

How you believe the country has gotten to where is it now?

If I am Putin or Xi, I would do nothing. Sit back and watch the US implodes.
 
How you believe the country has gotten to where is it now?

If I am Putin or Xi, I would do nothing. Sit back and watch the US implodes.
Get to where it is now? In what respects?

Crime, immigration?

Doesn't really matter.

I'll tell you because the answer is the same for both.

The US electoral system is shit. It allows the rich to control everything, allows them to focus on making money and not have to care one bit about the people, except for the inconvenience of the Bill of Rights, and they're manipulating the people, they're doing what they want, and it's making the US go crazy.

The solution is Proportional Representation.

But the rich call it "mob rule" because for them, if they're not controlling things, it is "mob rule". And people come on here and parrot what the rich want.

I say "look at Germany" and people say "this ain't Germany, I don't care about Germany" meaning "I can't even do basic research because..... [insert whatever insult you like]"
 
Bruce Springsteen wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. He said it’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, their innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

“King Trump's private army from the DHS / Guns belted to their coats / Came to Minneapolis to enforce the law / Or so their story goes,” Springsteen sings. “And there were bloody footprints / Where mercy should have stood / And two dead, left to die on snow-filled streets / Alex Pretti and Renee Good.”

Has the classic Bruce sound and passion.


yet bruce would probably never go there, stand out in freezing temps holding any **** ICE sign

nope, he's in his warm and comfy 10M home writing a song.......

old liberal pathetic douche.......where did he go from born in the USA to this garbage?

he's like a slightly younger neil young at this point
 
yet bruce would probably never go there, stand out in freezing temps holding any **** ICE sign

nope, he's in his warm and comfy 10M home writing a song.......

old liberal pathetic douche.......where did he go from born in the USA to this garbage?

he's like a slightly younger neil young at this point
His new song is Not Born in the USA
 
Get to where it is now? In what respects?

Crime, immigration?

Doesn't really matter.

I'll tell you because the answer is the same for both.

The US electoral system is shit. It allows the rich to control everything, allows them to focus on making money and not have to care one bit about the people, except for the inconvenience of the Bill of Rights, and they're manipulating the people, they're doing what they want, and it's making the US go crazy.

The solution is Proportional Representation.

But the rich call it "mob rule" because for them, if they're not controlling things, it is "mob rule". And people come on here and parrot what the rich want.

I say "look at Germany" and people say "this ain't Germany, I don't care about Germany" meaning "I can't even do basic research because..... [insert whatever insult you like]"
The country has only two political parties and if any group tries to start a third and fourth will face reckoning.

It's six of one, half a dozen of the other. That's the problem with both parties. Meanwhile, the people will cheer for the party that aligns with their narrative regardless if it's right or wrong. I don't blame the rich. Their money, they can spend as they wish. I do however blame the politicians. Their only objective is enriching themselves, friends, and families. This is where I don't see a difference with both sides. Republicans will say, "yeah, we are gonna create jobs for Americans and taking care of our citizens". Democrats say, "we are looking out for the poor and soak the rich." End of day, the average Joes and Janes are fucked as usual. How many years have Democrats say the party will end poverty. How many years have the GOP said we are winning the war on drugs. Decades of war against poverty and poverty hasn't gone down. The same goes for this useless war on drugs. Those are few problems with this country. Unless there are multiple parties like four or five, the people will continue to pay the price.

Republicans will tell you go find a ******* job.
Democrats will throw you a ******* bone to stop your complaining.
 
The country has only two political party system and if any group tries to start a third and fourth will face reckoning.

It's six of one, half a dozen of the other. That's the problem with both parties. Meanwhile, the people will cheer for the party that aligns with their narrative regardless if it's right or wrong. I don't blame the rich. Their money, they can spend as they wish. I do however blame the politicians. Their only objective is enriching themselves, friends, and families. This is where I don't see a difference with both sides. Republicans will say, "yeah, we are gonna create jobs for Americans and taking care of our citizens". Democrats say, "we are looking out for the poor and soak the rich." End of day, the average Joes and Janes are fucked as usual. How many years have Democrats say the party will end poverty. How many years have the GOP said we are winning the war on drugs. Decades of war against poverty and poverty hasn't gone down. The same goes for this useless war on drugs. Those are few problems with this country. Unless there are multiple parties like four or five, the people will continue to pay the price.

Republicans will tell you go find a ******* job.
Democrats will throw you a ******* bone to stop your complaining.
The people end up with nothing.

The FPTP system doesn't really allow for third or fourth parties.

Why? Because you have four choices.
1) Vote Rep
2) Vote Dem
3) Vote 3rd party
4) Don't vote.

If you vote Rep, then you want the Dems to lose
If you vote Dem, then you want the Reps to lose.

The US is very much a negative voting system. Most people are probably not voting for who they want to win.

3rd party just leads to you not having a say in loses and not voting is the same.

In the UK, which has FPTP, there has historically been three parties, Lib Dems and Labour split the left vote, and the Tories who get in most of the time. From 2010 to 2024 the Tories were in power. Every election, except one in 2019, Labour and the Lib Dems combined got more votes than the Tories, but the Tories were in government.

So, the left didn't care. Now, Reform is emerging and will split the right vote.

But still, imagine a situation where there are four parties, one gets 23.2% of the vote, one 23.3% of the vote, one 23.4% of the vote and the other 23.5% of the vote. Clearly there is no consensus, but just pure luck will give the latter the seat.

It's ridiculous (and West Belfast in 2015 had a candidate win with less than 25% of the vote).

This leads to politicians who don't have to care about the voters. They just have to care about making enough money to promote themselves enough to get elected.

And yes, the people end up with nothing.

No point in voting, it's worth getting on the streets because you might actually stop something from happening, because a few thousand people can do more than millions at the ballot box.

So, it's time for change, but the rich don't want change and the people are too ignorant to change.
 
15th post
Springsteen is heartless.
Why hasn't Springsteen written a song for all of innocent American citizens who have been murdered by the Democrat Party's illegal alien criminals?
All of those murderers were charged, tried, and convicted. The outrage is over the coverup. No one gets away with violence and murder except ICE thugs and 1,700 Jan 6 rioters. They are free to injure and kill without repercussions if it is in the name of Trump. All those assholes above got justice applied. Not ICE. Not Jan 6 rioters. Not in the name of Trump.
 
So the US needs more murders when the country already has a murder problem?
Crime is near all time lows. It was for years until Trump's spike in 2020. Then it came down under Biden. We are half the murder rate as 1990's. Half.
 
The violent right ladies and gentlemen.

Yep, while you attack police with guns trying to stop criminals from being arrested, shoot Kirk and try to assassinate Trump riots in the streets faking attacks with apple juice claiming trump did it, I'm the "violent" one for making a joke about a butthole singer.

BTW Ace, Springsteen has actually DROPPED his stupid song. :lmao:
 
Back
Top Bottom