British PM Keir Starmer Wants NATO & US Combat Troops in Ukraine as Peacekeepers

[DonGlock26]

"British PM Keir Starmer Says He Will Organize EU Ceasefire Security Force with France +2, and Count on U.S. Military Backstop From Trump​

March 2, 2025 | Sundance |


British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is holding a Ukraine summit in London today with EU leaders, following two phone calls with President Trump.

According to the outline Starmer proposed on BBC News, following the disastrous Zelenskyy meeting in the White House, the British PM called President Trump and also Emmanuel Macron. According to his statements, Starmer told Trump he would work with Macron +2 unidentified countries (a “coalition of the willing”), to organize an EU security force for a Ukraine ceasefire; then the group will require Trump to provide a U.S. troop “backstop” as an insurance policy.

Starmer completely ignores the NATO provocations against Russia that preceded the military operation by Vladimir Putin, instead blaming only the aggression of Putin for the expansion of NATO in Europe. Interview Below:"







This is insane. There is no way NATO troops should be in Ukraine and US troops is out of the question. If Starmer and Macron really wanted peace they would want neutral peacekeepers. This is a recipe for WWIII. Why do these WEF globalist progressives want us on the brink of WWII?

 

[pknopp]

Stupid idea. We have seen this fail many times.

 

[lg325]

UN peace forces need used, no NATO members. Using NATO members would be a provocation to Putin.

Let us not make the same mistakes made in the past.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"British PM Keir Starmer Says He Will Organize EU Ceasefire Security Force with France +2, and Count on U.S. Military Backstop From Trump​

March 2, 2025 | Sundance |


British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is holding a Ukraine summit in London today with EU leaders, following two phone calls with President Trump.

According to the outline Starmer proposed on BBC News, following the disastrous Zelenskyy meeting in the White House, the British PM called President Trump and also Emmanuel Macron. According to his statements, Starmer told Trump he would work with Macron +2 unidentified countries (a “coalition of the willing”), to organize an EU security force for a Ukraine ceasefire; then the group will require Trump to provide a U.S. troop “backstop” as an insurance policy.

Starmer completely ignores the NATO provocations against Russia that preceded the military operation by Vladimir Putin, instead blaming only the aggression of Putin for the expansion of NATO in Europe. Interview Below:"







This is insane. There is no way NATO troops should be in Ukraine and US troops is out of the question. If Starmer and Macron really wanted peace they would want neutral peacekeepers. This is a recipe for WWIII. Why do these WEF globalist progressives want us on the brink of WWII?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"British PM Keir Starmer Says He Will Organize EU Ceasefire Security Force with France +2, and Count on U.S. Military Backstop From Trump​

March 2, 2025 | Sundance |


British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is holding a Ukraine summit in London today with EU leaders, following two phone calls with President Trump.

According to the outline Starmer proposed on BBC News, following the disastrous Zelenskyy meeting in the White House, the British PM called President Trump and also Emmanuel Macron. According to his statements, Starmer told Trump he would work with Macron +2 unidentified countries (a “coalition of the willing”), to organize an EU security force for a Ukraine ceasefire; then the group will require Trump to provide a U.S. troop “backstop” as an insurance policy.

Starmer completely ignores the NATO provocations against Russia that preceded the military operation by Vladimir Putin, instead blaming only the aggression of Putin for the expansion of NATO in Europe. Interview Below:"







This is insane. There is no way NATO troops should be in Ukraine and US troops is out of the question. If Starmer and Macron really wanted peace they would want neutral peacekeepers. This is a recipe for WWIII. Why do these WEF globalist progressives want us on the brink of WWII?

Arm the Brits, but not to go to Ukraine

 

[MisterBeale]

Can't use "peacekeepers," until there is peace.

I don't really believe that Europe or Ukraine want peace.

Nor would I put it below them, to do everything they can to sabotage the process.


If they didn't complain when we blew up Nordstream, I just don't think they are going to come to the peace table willingly.

 

[MisterBeale]

Arm the Brits, but not to go to Ukraine

That would be like giving money to an addict or alcoholic, and expecting them not to use it on booze and drugs.


The crown has been obsessed with destroying Russia for longer than we have been a nation.

 

[Harry Dresden]

UN peace forces need used, no NATO members. Using NATO members would be a provocation to Putin.

Let us not make the same mistakes made in the past.

the UN?.....they should have been there 3 years ago....

 

[mudwhistle]

Stupid idea. We have seen this fail many times.

UN peace forces need used, no NATO members. Using NATO members would be a provocation to Putin.

Let us not make the same mistakes made in the past.

The UN only perpetuates the problem.

I've worked with the UN back in the 90s.

They cannot be trusted.

Best thing to do is make it economic suicide for Ukraine and Russia to keep fighting.

 

[pknopp]

The UN only perpetuates the problem.

I've worked with the UN back in the 90s.

They cannot be trusted.

Best thing to do is make it economic suicide for Ukraine and Russia to keep fighting.

The best thing is to walk away.

 

[mudwhistle]

The best thing is to walk away.

That's your solution.

When the going gets tough.....GTF outta there.

Classic Democrat move.

 

[pknopp]

That's your solution.

When the going gets tough.....GTF outta there.

Classic Democrat move.

It's a position Trump took a few days ago.

 

[Oddball]

How about the pinko cuck Starmer send all the illegal kebabs who've boated their way into his country to Ukraine as the "peacekeeping force"?

 

[DonGlock26]

I thought of that very clip.

 

[DonGlock26]

The best thing is to walk away.

You want to abandon the Ukraine now?

 

[mudwhistle]

It's a position Trump took a few days ago.

No it's not.

In what way is working a deal for mineral rights in Ukraine mean walking away from Ukraine?

 

[mudwhistle]

You want to abandon the Ukraine now?

Sure sounds like it.

 

[pknopp]

You want to abandon the Ukraine now?

I never wanted us involved from the start.

 

[DonGlock26]

It's a position Trump took a few days ago.

Trump made the Ukrainians withdraw....from the Oval Office.

If Putin goes to the Oval Office, I'm sure he will wear a suit and tie.

 

[mudwhistle]

No it's not.

In what way is working a deal for mineral rights in Ukraine mean walking away from Ukraine?

Fake news?

Are you claiming that Trump signing a deal with Ukraine is walking away from Ukraine?