The hell of it is the US had the basic design of the T-34 in the Cristie suspension system but chose not to pursue it to it's conclusion.
Well, the design was created by an American, and the US did look into it for several tank models. In fact, they purchased over a dozen different Christie designed tank demonstrators over almost 20 years. And the issues between Christie and the Army were legendary. But it goes even beyond that, as not even the T-34 really used the "Christie Drive" as the inventor had intended.
Now one of the primary features of his design was that they used oversized wheels that were each powered, and that they had the ability to be used even with the tracks taken off. In fact, they were almost always faster with the tracks removed. However, his tracks were almost an afterthought, and the vehicles behaved much better on wheels than on tracks. Especially when it came to steering, which was poor when the tracks were in use.
However, while the Soviets did indeed use the suspension and track system, they completely discarded any thought of operating them without tracks shortly after they were introduced. The crewmembers of the BT series almost never operated them without tracks, and it was simply not worth the hassle. The removable tracks was completely discarded in the T-34. In almost all ways, they were conventional tanks in all ways, just using the track system.
And even the Soviets realized the issues with the Christie suspension, but it was simple and both easier and quicker to manufacture because it had less moving parts. And it was only used during WWII in the BT series and T34. Once the war was over and they had more resources even the Soviets abandoned the design, instead going to a more conventional torsion bar suspension. So while later Soviet tanks like the T-54 and T-55 look like they use a Christie suspension, they do not. The suspension is pretty much like any other tanks like say the American ones, simply without the top rollers.