Brennan an official “target” of DOJ case being placed before grand jury

[BackAgain]

yawn...

Anything specific or just more rage?

back at ya.

I was specific. I’m not sure why you “ask,” crapcorn.

After all this time, are you truly so massively unfamiliar with the behavior of that creepy man and a former Administration’s use and abuse of the justice system as a political weapon against an opposing candidate?

Maybe I gave you too much credit.

 

[candycorn]

back at ya.

I was specific. I’m not sure why you “ask,” crapcorn.

After all this time, are you truly so massively unfamiliar with the behavior of that creepy man and a former Administration’s use and abuse of the justice system as a political weapon against an opposing candidate?

Maybe I gave you too much credit.

You never mentioned what he supposedly did other than your opinions which are useless and cartoonish. Just more rage...that's all you supply these days.

 

[BackAgain]

You never mentioned what he supposedly did other than your opinions which are useless and cartoonish. Just more rage...that's all you supply these days.

I am still not buying your pretending needing to be told.

I’m pretty sure that it was discussed many times since we first discovered what they were doing. And I also am sure that you almost certainly discussed it.

And everything with you (when you wish to deflect) is such ignorant nonsense.

But, here is a very distilled summary just for you, crapcorn.

The allegations are the Brennan was a part of a coordinated effort in 2016–2017 to damage the candidacy of Trump, politically, by misusing intelligence and law-enforcement processes.

For instance, among other things, Brennan orchestrated that ridiculous ICA of Russian interference in our 2016 Election to assist Trump.

He fed unverified (and later proven to be untrustworthy) “intelligence” to the FBI.

I wonder if you’re equally as ignorant regarding Operation Crossfire Hurricane as you claim to be about the accusations made about Brennan.

 

[candycorn]

I am still not buying your pretending needing to be told.

I’m pretty sure that it was discussed many times since we first discovered what they were doing. And I also am sure that you almost certainly discussed it.

And everything with you (when you wish to deflect) is such ignorant nonsense.

But, here is a very distilled summary just for you, crapcorn.

The allegations are the Brennan was a part of a coordinated effort in 2016–2017 to damage the candidacy of Trump, politically, by misusing intelligence and law-enforcement processes.

For instance, among other things, Brennan orchestrated that ridiculous ICA of Russian interference in our 2016 Election to assist Trump.

He fed unverified (and later proven to be untrustworthy) “intelligence” to the FBI.

I wonder if you’re equally as ignorant regarding Operation Crossfire Hurricane as you claim to be about the accusations made about Brennan.

Given that the US Senate confirmed russian interference as did the Mueller report and the meetings between your blob's crew and russian intel are well documented and blob-like-creatures did time in jail for crimes related to the meetings.... you've got no case. As you'll find out.

 

[BackAgain]

Given that the US Senate confirmed russian interference as did the Mueller report and the meetings between your blob's crew and russian intel are well documented and blob-like-creatures did time in jail for crimes related to the meetings.... you've got no case. As you'll find out.

Your steadfast and intentional ignorance is pretty amazing. Mueller couldn’t explain how or why he came to his decisions. That was an embarrassing shit show for him.

Plus, a Senate “confirmation” doesn’t mean dick because it was a process polluted by politics.

I am not impressed with your brainless assumptions about whether or not there is a case. (It wouldn’t be “my” case, in any event you shitlb idiot.)

Brennan and all the others involved deserve to be investigated and, of course, prosecuted if there is a way they can secure a Grand Jury Indictment from a DC grand jury.

 

[candycorn]

Your steadfast and intentional ignorance is pretty amazing. Mueller couldn’t explain how or why he came to his decisions. That was an embarrassing shit show for him.

Never happened.

Plus, a Senate “confirmation” doesn’t mean dick because it was a process polluted by politics.

The GOP controlled the senate at the time. You’re 0 for 2 dickless.

I am not impressed with your brainless assumptions about whether or not there is a case. (It wouldn’t be “my” case, in any event you shitlb idiot.)

Make me laugh harder.

Brennan and all the others involved deserve to be investigated and, of course, prosecuted if there is a way they can secure a Grand Jury Indictment from a DC grand jury.

Since you can’t identify a crime…good luck dickless. The clock is ticking.

 

[BackAgain]

Never happened.

That’s it. When you can’t acknowledge recorded historical facts, just lie and deny deny deny. You’re a true shitlib.

The GOP controlled the senate at the time. You’re 0 for 2

So what, you dimwit? I said politics. I don’t say Republicans vs Democraps. M
And you’re incapable of keeping score honestly or accurately, ya ****.

Make me laugh harder.

Make me care about whether a drooling shitlib retard like you is laughing at anything.

Since you can’t identify a crime…good luck dickless. The clock is ticking.

Who said I couldn’t identify a crime? You don’t see the problem. The nonsense you say to yourself is usually off the mark.

 

[candycorn]

That’s it.

That’s enough.

When you can’t acknowledge recorded historical facts, just lie and deny deny deny. You’re a true shitlib.

Your crazy allegations are comically wrong

So what, you dimwit? I said politics. I don’t say Republicans vs Democraps. M
And you’re incapable of keeping score honestly or accurately, ya ****.mm

Again…pure comedy

Who said I couldn’t identify a crime?

Me. And I proved it.

You don’t see the problem. The nonsense you say to yourself is usually off the mark.

Well where are the indictments if it’s that obvious?

 

[BackAgain]

That’s enough.

no. Not at all.

Your crazy allegations are comically wrong

Your reliance on your self serving leftard propaganda is hysterical.

Again…pure comedy

You laugh at shiny little pieces of foil. You’re a retard.

Me. And I proved it.

Of course, that’s a lie.

Well where are the indictments if it’s that obvious?

Another stupid question from a very stupid troll.

Your form of “logic” [sic] suggests that accusations are only clearly and credibly based when an indictment has taken place.
You’re truly too stupid to breathe without prompts.

 

[candycorn]

Your form of “logic” [sic] suggests that accusations are only clearly and credibly based when an indictment has taken place.
You’re truly too stupid to breathe without prompts.

Without indictments…all you have is your whining. Perhaps your sock puppets can join in so you can have a whiny quartet?

 

[BackAgain]

Without indictments…all you have is your whining.

Wrong. 1. The false label of “whining” is just another candyass lie.

And it doesn’t require an indictment to make an accusation, you moron. In fact, mere accusations don’t even always justify an investigation. But when they do, those very accusations are the bases for ensuing indictments.

Your ignorance remains massive.

Perhaps your sock puppets can join in so you can have a whiny quartet?

As you know but choose to constantly lie about, I don’t have any socks. I never have.
It could be just that you are very stupid, but in your case it’s probably the fault of your endless dishonesty. Still, that I have used other usernames doesn’t = having ever used any socks.

Get back to your talking points memos and try to sell your propaganda more effectively. So far, you merely try. But your propaganda is always a flop.

 

[candycorn]

Wrong. 1. The false label of “whining” is just another candyass lie.

And it doesn’t require an indictment to make an accusation, you moron. In fact, mere accusations don’t even always justify an investigation. But when they do, those very accusations are the bases for ensuing indictments.

So what you’re saying is that all you have are accusations....great.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Um again, Statute of Limitations.

 

[BackAgain]

So what you’re saying is that all you have are accusations....great.

Not remotely what I said.

Newsflash for ignorant brainless shitlib simps like you. A formal indictment — officially charging someone with a felony or felonies — is also merely an iteration of accusations.

 

[Lockback]

John Brennan's lawyers confirm he is 'target' of Florida grand jury probe, asks judge to intervene

The letter to chief federal judge in Miami is an extraordinary injection by Brennan's defense team and likely signals his lawyers fear an indictment is imminent.

justthenews.com

His lawyers confirm which means they got official notification.

Still has to come to a vote. And if there is an indictment, of course, some liberal judge will likely try to make use of strained readings of the law to scuttle the indictment.

It won’t happen overnight. But justice is gonna rain down on the vermin — vermin like Brennan.

I hate that SOB.
I want to see that creep in prison garb.
Truly an evil POS.

 

[candycorn]

Not remotely what I said.

Its exactly what you said.

Newsflash for ignorant brainless shitlib simps like you. A formal indictment — officially charging someone with a felony or felonies — is also merely an iteration of accusations.

No it’s an official position of the jurisdiction.

You whining like a little Beeotch is one thing.... We’re used to it. Its what you’ve done since Obama was elected.

The courts indicting someone means they have to prove their accusation. When there are no indictments...that means that there is no proof.

 

[BackAgain]

Its exactly what you said.

Untrue. I’m wondering if you’re just your usual retard self or a determined liar. But either way, as always, you remain wrong.

No it’s an official position of the jurisdiction.

Which sets forth its litany of as yet untested accusations. This really isn’t hard stuff. You are truly a moron.

You whining like a little Beeotch is one thing....

Yeah. Another one of your lies.

We’re used to it. It’s what you’ve done since Obama was elected.

I think it’s hilarious when one of you literally stupid morns pretend you speak for more than just yourselves.

Nice bit of creative writing, though. You moonbat.

The courts indicting someone means they have to prove their accusation.

Courts don’t indict, stupid. And courts don’t have to prove anything, either. You moron.

When there are no indictments...that means that there is no proof.

Wrong again. A grand jury determines if the evidence presented to them establishes “reasonable cause to believe that a crime had been committed and, if so, whether the evidence provides reasonable cause to accuse the defendant of that crime.” (Paraphrased from memory.)

So the grand jury only gets to say that there’s enough to indict.

Proving it is the job of the prosecutor. Not a judge.