Breaking: Trump CFO Granted Immunity

[jc456]

so tell me the crime genius. stop struggling with it and name it.

Henry?

Henry who?

What a moron.

well I did a search and no henry in there. so yeah, for that one name, I have no fking clue. I can admit it because I'm not better than anyone in here

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

 

[jc456]

He was smart and trustworthy enough for Trump to employ him for over a decade , dope.

Yeah, any attack you make on Cohen or Flynn or Manafort or Gates or Omarosa....is an attack on Trump's judgement.

As he hand picked every one of them.

So just to be clear, so you're attacking Obama's judgement for going to a racist's church for all those years?

Tell me about that. Wow, so you say Obama's really fucked up, huh?

And wow, Hillary is still married to a sexual predator. Wow, you really piss on her judgement. Wow.

You and all those people, you feel the same, huh? You always do

I'm saying exactly what I've said. That any attack you make on Cohen, Flynn, Manafort, Gates or Omarosa is an attack on Trump's judgment. As he hand picked each and every one of them for leadership roles in his campaign or administration.

Feel free to quote me. As you clearly have no rational argument to refute me.

Yes, you're "saying exactly what {you've} said." Your rules for Republicans and Democrats are completely different.

Judge Trump by the company he keeps. Fair enough. So let's use your measuring stick and judge Obama by the church he went to for many years and concluded he's a flaming ****** hating racist like his minister. Let's judge Hillary by that she's been married to a sexual predator most of her life. Let's judge Gore by that he was a two term veep to a sexual predator.

You have a point. Hillary is a sick ****. Obama is a racist. You have a point

Why do you keep going off topic with the HRC & the Obama shit? The thread is about Trump's CFO.

You sound like Trump, constantly screaming about Obama this & Hillary that; why isn't the FBI investigating them & their crimes?

Well, I tell you what: Once Trump's CFO (THAT is what the thread is about) spills the beans on Trump, Donald will likely either be in prison, or hanging out in some nation that does not have an extradition treaty with the US; some place like, Russia.

about what? ask your magic eight ball for us.

 

[hunarcy]

There is no limit to what you can contribute to your own campaign.

True, but it does have to be reported, or it is a violation.

carrying civil penalties.

FEC Increases Civil Penalties for Violations of Federal Election Laws

The question that will be looked into is was not reporting them a mistake or willful.

Still not criminal.

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

 

[Harpy Eagle]

True, but it does have to be reported, or it is a violation.

carrying civil penalties.

FEC Increases Civil Penalties for Violations of Federal Election Laws

The question that will be looked into is was not reporting them a mistake or willful.

Still not criminal.

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Henry?

Henry who?

What a moron.

well I did a search and no henry in there. so yeah, for that one name, I have no fking clue. I can admit it because I'm not better than anyone in here

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

 

[jc456]

Henry who?

What a moron.

well I did a search and no henry in there. so yeah, for that one name, I have no fking clue. I can admit it because I'm not better than anyone in here

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

well duh!!!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What a moron.

well I did a search and no henry in there. so yeah, for that one name, I have no fking clue. I can admit it because I'm not better than anyone in here

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

well duh!!!

That's why you're a moron.
Do you need an explanation of this post as well?

 

[jc456]

well I did a search and no henry in there. so yeah, for that one name, I have no fking clue. I can admit it because I'm not better than anyone in here

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

well duh!!!

That's why you're a moron.
Do you need an explanation of this post as well?

still don't know who Henry is. just saying

 

[hunarcy]

carrying civil penalties.

FEC Increases Civil Penalties for Violations of Federal Election Laws

The question that will be looked into is was not reporting them a mistake or willful.

Still not criminal.

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

 

[hunarcy]

Wow!
Kaz was making a joke, moron.

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

well duh!!!

That's why you're a moron.
Do you need an explanation of this post as well?

still don't know who Henry is. just saying

The guy was demanding a name. She gave a name. It was a joke.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The question that will be looked into is was not reporting them a mistake or willful.

Still not criminal.

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

 

[hunarcy]

Still not criminal.

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

I know you hope so.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The former is not, the latter is.

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

I know you hope so.

You actually know nothing, as your posting proves

 

[hunarcy]

Enforcing federal campaign finance law - FEC.gov

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

I know you hope so.

You actually know nothing, as your posting proves

Anyone can read the FEC site and see you're just making crap up. The saddest thing is that you believe you're correct when you are just spewing garbage.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

1. Three Types of Enforcement Federal campaign financing violations are subject to three types of enforcement:

i) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as felonies, either under FECA; under other federal criminal statutes addressing frauds and false statements, such as 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, and 1519; or under Title 26 statutes if the matter involves a publicly funded presidential campaign;

ii) Criminal prosecution by the Justice Department as FECA misdemeanors if the amount of the violation does not reach the felony threshold; and

iii) Civil enforcement proceedings by the FEC.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

I know you hope so.

You actually know nothing, as your posting proves

Anyone can read the FEC site and see you're just making crap up. The saddest thing is that you believe you're correct when you are just spewing garbage.

Anyone can read the link I gave and see you are ignoring the fact.

No, the saddest thing is that I am wasting my time arguing with a Trump sheep. But I can fix that!

 

[hunarcy]

As established by my link, the Department of Justice only gets involved if the Administrative fines are not paid...then your link applies.

Or if the offense rises above administrative fines level.

I know you hope so.

You actually know nothing, as your posting proves

Anyone can read the FEC site and see you're just making crap up. The saddest thing is that you believe you're correct when you are just spewing garbage.

Anyone can read the link I gave and see you are ignoring the fact.

No, the saddest thing is that I am wasting my time arguing with a Trump sheep. But I can fix that!

Good lord, you binary thinkers are lame. Just because I point out that you're wrong doesn't mean I'm a Trump supporter. It means I know what the truth is and showed it to you. I think you should "fix" it and just admit that your anti-Trump hate is fueling your mistake, realize that we as a nation could have a brighter future if you and all the other Trump haters could give up the hate and embrace Progressive policies that improved the lives of people.

 

[jc456]

yeah, I don't get it.

Obviously.

well duh!!!

That's why you're a moron.
Do you need an explanation of this post as well?

still don't know who Henry is. just saying

The guy was demanding a name. She gave a name. It was a joke.

it was on my post and I demanded no name.

 

[playtime]

He was smart and trustworthy enough for Trump to employ him for over a decade , dope.

Yeah, any attack you make on Cohen or Flynn or Manafort or Gates or Omarosa....is an attack on Trump's judgement.

As he hand picked every one of them.

So just to be clear, so you're attacking Obama's judgement for going to a racist's church for all those years?

Tell me about that. Wow, so you say Obama's really fucked up, huh?

And wow, Hillary is still married to a sexual predator. Wow, you really piss on her judgement. Wow.

You and all those people, you feel the same, huh? You always do

I'm saying exactly what I've said. That any attack you make on Cohen, Flynn, Manafort, Gates or Omarosa is an attack on Trump's judgment. As he hand picked each and every one of them for leadership roles in his campaign or administration.

Feel free to quote me. As you clearly have no rational argument to refute me.

Yes, you're "saying exactly what {you've} said." Your rules for Republicans and Democrats are completely different.

Judge Trump by the company he keeps. Fair enough. So let's use your measuring stick and judge Obama by the church he went to for many years and concluded he's a flaming ****** hating racist like his minister. Let's judge Hillary by that she's been married to a sexual predator most of her life. Let's judge Gore by that he was a two term veep to a sexual predator.

You have a point. Hillary is a sick ****. Obama is a racist. You have a point

Why do you keep going off topic with the HRC & the Obama shit? The thread is about Trump's CFO.

You sound like Trump, constantly screaming about Obama this & Hillary that; why isn't the FBI investigating them & their crimes?

Well, I tell you what: Once Trump's CFO (THAT is what the thread is about) spills the beans on Trump, Donald will likely either be in prison, or hanging out in some nation that does not have an extradition treaty with the US; some place like, Russia.

kaz is all in when it comes to trump. he bathes in that cult of personality cesspool.

 

[playtime]

This is a huge story. This guy knows where every cent went, who got it and why it was paid.

Worse for Trump, he knows what was being covered up.

Now explain what this has to do with Russian Collusion.

if trump took red cash that wasn't legal because his line of credit tanked bigly in the 90's; where us banks cut him off & he was put on an allowence because of his severe debt & belly up failed business'... that would be a problem for donny.

Are you trying to invent another crime, or did you read this on one of the many Soros funded internet sites?

both.

 

[playtime]

Skylar: Trump didn't file a form

kaz: Obama didn't file the same form 1,300 times

Skylar: WTF, what does that have to do with it???

LOL, what a stupid douche. Absolutely. I keep saying I agree with you. Trump should have to pay whatever Obama did. Divided by 1,300 times of course since Obama did it 1,300 times and Trump only did it once. Nail Trump's ass to the wall.

The total fines Obama paid was $375,000 for his criminal campaign's violations of election laws. But that was beyond the forms he didn't file, so I don't know how much of it was for not filing the forms that Trump didn't file.

Maybe Mueller can see if Trump got any traffic tickets. I mean sure, he probably paid them, but it's critical to know, don't you think?

Trump directed his personal lawyer to make illegal campaign contributions before the election. Then Trump reimbursed Cohen after the election through fraud. And lied to cover it up. And compelled others to lie to cover it up.

The fact that Trump didn't file any paperwork on his direction of illegal campaign contributions and fraud is just icing on the cake.

And there's zero evidence that Obama personally directed anything that resulted in a campaign finance violation. Or compelled anyone else to lie about it. Or reimbursed anyone through fraud.

While there is lots of evidence that Trump did.

It wasn't an illegal campaign contribution, dumb ass. Even in your story, Trump paid it back. I'm curious. In this criminal conspiracy to commit a crime, what is the statute number for the crime of plotting to not file a form?

Skylar: It's OK that Obama didn't file the form 1,300 times, he didn't conspire to not file the form like Trump did. Obama just didn't file the form. No conspiracy, see??? If you just don't file the form, it's a fine. But if you conspire to not file the form, that's a felony ...

It wasn't an illegal campaign contribution, dumb ass. Even in your story, Trump paid it back.

Yes, dope. Trump made a payment to cover for a felony. Also a felony.

apparently there are all kinds sleazy little secrets locked up somewhere regarding president tinkles' escapades- that he wanted to buy back... a charge for each one seems just. i wonder how the fundies will be spinning that?

When you want to vent butt hurt, can you remember to make some sort of sense at some level?

you can start here, oh poorly educated one:

National Enquirer Had Decades of Trump Dirt. He Wanted to Buy It All.

By Jim Rutenberg and Maggie Haberman

• Aug. 30, 2018

Federal investigators have provided ample evidence that President Trump was involved in deals to pay two women to keep them from speaking publicly before the 2016 election about affairs that they said they had with him.

But it turns out that Mr. Trump wanted to go even further.

He and his lawyer at the time, Michael D. Cohen, devised a plan to buy up all the dirt on Mr. Trump that the National Enquirer and its parent company had collected on him, dating back to the 1980s, according to several of Mr. Trump’s associates.
[...]
National Enquirer Had Decades of Trump Dirt. He Wanted to Buy It All.

trump may have a lot of problems comin' his way that just might bring some more campaign finance charges & the christian fundies might double down on selling their souls by defending all of it yet again - or will have no choice but to turn on him - not to mention TWOUS, melania.