BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...

[Linkiloo]

I've been on this Board for years and this is the first time I've seen theliq claim to be Jewish.

It is funny how anti-semites think that pretending to be Jews makes their arguments better somehow. Or maybe he converted recently

 

[theliq]

Are you black or white? Are you an Ashkenazi or Sephardic Jew? Are you a member of the Lemba Clan? Do you recognize Israelites of tribes other than that of Judah, such as Beta Israel? From your demeanor i suspect you are an Ashkenazi Jew...descended from European prosylytes; thereby watering down your claim to the land we now know as Israel.

All wrong.Basque....you were surmising...leave me now,whilst I lay looking at the drifting clouds and beautiful blue sky in a field of hepatica

Yeah cut and run..You're no fighter.

It is tough to fight when you struggle with simple punctuation.
Funny, I thought that people in Australia spoke English. Or is there no requirement to go to school there? Enquiring minds want to know.

My last paragraph contained no typos. You read it. But if the big words confuse you I'll dumb it down a bit. What Jewish identity are you affiliated with? Careful... I might be a Rabbi who is testing you..

I was referring to the Liq.

I cannot be referred to by you because you are filth

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.

(1) Occupation

Occupation is an original mode of acquisition by a State of a title to a territory. It implies the establishment of sovereignty over a territory not under the authority of any other State (terra nullius) whether newly discovered or abandoned by the State formerly in control (unlikely to occur).[15]

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.[16] Effectiveness requires on the part of the Claimant State two elements: an intention or will to act as sovereign, and the adequate exercise of sovereignty. Intention may be inferred from all the facts, although sometimes it may be formally expressed in official notifications to other States. Adequate exercise of sovereignty must be peaceful, real, and continuous.​

Neither the British occupation nor the Israeli occupations have been peaceful.

These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law.

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf​

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

 

[Slyhunter]

All wrong.Basque....you were surmising...leave me now,whilst I lay looking at the drifting clouds and beautiful blue sky in a field of hepatica

Yeah cut and run..You're no fighter.

It is tough to fight when you struggle with simple punctuation.
Funny, I thought that people in Australia spoke English. Or is there no requirement to go to school there? Enquiring minds want to know.

My last paragraph contained no typos. You read it. But if the big words confuse you I'll dumb it down a bit. What Jewish identity are you affiliated with? Careful... I might be a Rabbi who is testing you..

I was referring to the Liq.

I cannot be referred to by you because you are filth

You sound like a Muslim.

 

[Slyhunter]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.

(1) Occupation

Occupation is an original mode of acquisition by a State of a title to a territory. It implies the establishment of sovereignty over a territory not under the authority of any other State (terra nullius) whether newly discovered or abandoned by the State formerly in control (unlikely to occur).[15]

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.[16] Effectiveness requires on the part of the Claimant State two elements: an intention or will to act as sovereign, and the adequate exercise of sovereignty. Intention may be inferred from all the facts, although sometimes it may be formally expressed in official notifications to other States. Adequate exercise of sovereignty must be peaceful, real, and continuous.​

Neither the British occupation nor the Israeli occupations have been peaceful.

These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law.

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf​

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.

(1) Occupation

Occupation is an original mode of acquisition by a State of a title to a territory. It implies the establishment of sovereignty over a territory not under the authority of any other State (terra nullius) whether newly discovered or abandoned by the State formerly in control (unlikely to occur).[15]

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.[16] Effectiveness requires on the part of the Claimant State two elements: an intention or will to act as sovereign, and the adequate exercise of sovereignty. Intention may be inferred from all the facts, although sometimes it may be formally expressed in official notifications to other States. Adequate exercise of sovereignty must be peaceful, real, and continuous.​

Neither the British occupation nor the Israeli occupations have been peaceful.

These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law.

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf​

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

 

[Hollie]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.

(1) Occupation

Occupation is an original mode of acquisition by a State of a title to a territory. It implies the establishment of sovereignty over a territory not under the authority of any other State (terra nullius) whether newly discovered or abandoned by the State formerly in control (unlikely to occur).[15]

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.[16] Effectiveness requires on the part of the Claimant State two elements: an intention or will to act as sovereign, and the adequate exercise of sovereignty. Intention may be inferred from all the facts, although sometimes it may be formally expressed in official notifications to other States. Adequate exercise of sovereignty must be peaceful, real, and continuous.​

Neither the British occupation nor the Israeli occupations have been peaceful.

These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law.

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf​

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

Israel’s military presence was a requirement in view or the invading Arab-Moslem armies crossing the frontier.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

(1) Occupation

Occupation is an original mode of acquisition by a State of a title to a territory. It implies the establishment of sovereignty over a territory not under the authority of any other State (terra nullius) whether newly discovered or abandoned by the State formerly in control (unlikely to occur).[15]

For the title acquired through occupation to be final and valid under International Law, the presence and control of a State over the concerned territory must be effective.[16] Effectiveness requires on the part of the Claimant State two elements: an intention or will to act as sovereign, and the adequate exercise of sovereignty. Intention may be inferred from all the facts, although sometimes it may be formally expressed in official notifications to other States. Adequate exercise of sovereignty must be peaceful, real, and continuous.​

Neither the British occupation nor the Israeli occupations have been peaceful.

These rules underline the basic concern of the law of occupation, which is to maintain the status quo ante (i.e. as it was before) in the occupied territory as far as is practically possible. This makes sense. The annexation of conquered territory is prohibited by international law.

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf​

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

Israel’s military presence was a requirement in view or the invading Arab-Moslem armies crossing the frontier.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

About half of the Palestinian refugees were created before any Arab army crossed over into Palestine.

 

[Hollie]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, the handbook does say that.

(COMMENT)

IF the threshold of "peace" is never achieved, THEN there was never an end to hostilities.

Yes, it says "conquered." The conflict between the Israeli Forces and the Jordanian Forces officially ended with the Peace Treaty of 1994.

"Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them;

Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace;"
​

The Eastern Boundary of Israel (relative to the West Bank) and the boundary Line shall follow the middle of the main course of the flow of the Jordan and Yarmouk Rivers. The boundary line is shown on the 1:50,000 image maps (2 sheets Appendix II attached to the Annex). The list of geographic and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates of this boundary line shall be based on Israel Jordan Boundary Datum (IJBD 1994) and, when completed and agreed upon by both parties, this list of coordinates shall be binding and take precedence over the maps as to the location of the boundary line in the Dead Sea and the salt pans.

Most Respectfully,
R

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

Israel’s military presence was a requirement in view or the invading Arab-Moslem armies crossing the frontier.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

About half of the Palestinian refugees were created before any Arab army crossed over into Palestine.

You're befuddled. You use the slogan "refugees" without understanding the term or the context.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I was talking about the 1948 occupation.

BTW, it is difficult to consider conquest in relation with Egypt and Jordan since neither was at war with Palestine. Armistice lines were drawn through Palestine, effectively dividing into three areas of occupation. The UN talked about permanent peace in Palestine. Then they just went home and forgot what they said.

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

Israel’s military presence was a requirement in view or the invading Arab-Moslem armies crossing the frontier.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

About half of the Palestinian refugees were created before any Arab army crossed over into Palestine.

You're befuddled. You use the slogan "refugees" without understanding the term or the context.

Being kicked out if their homes by a foreign military qualifies.

 

[Hollie]

Did they have a government in 1948 or was it simply anarchy?
They can't ***** since they didn't have a government of their own to protect themselves from being encroached.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

Israel’s military presence was a requirement in view or the invading Arab-Moslem armies crossing the frontier.

Israeli bullshit, of course.

About half of the Palestinian refugees were created before any Arab army crossed over into Palestine.

You're befuddled. You use the slogan "refugees" without understanding the term or the context.

Being kicked out if their homes by a foreign military qualifies.

Indeed, the invading Arab-Islamist armies uprooted many Arab-Moslem squatters.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

That is a "Drunk History" (alternative) view to reality. There was no "cut'n'run."

02/27/1948

PAL/138 Future government of Palestine - UN Palestine Commission as successor Government of Palestine/UK memorandum (excerpts) - Press release
05/14/1948 A/554 Palestine question/appointment of UN Mediator/Palestine Commission relieved of responsibilities - GA resolutions
05/14/1948

A/RES/186 (S-2) United Nations Mediator in Palestine/ Appointment, terms of reference/ End of UN Palestine Commission - GA second special session - Resolution
05/15/1948 S/747 Proclamation of state of Israel - Cablegram to SecGen 1948/05/15

05/15/1948 S/745 LAS cablegram to SG
05/17/1948 PAL/169 Palestine question - Palestine Commission adjourns sine die - Press release
​

The UN Palestine Commission was immediately replaced by the UN Mediator on station in Jerusalem. This was done in the expectation of an eminent Arab League Attack.

Palestine was under the trusteeship of the UNPC at the time. They cut and run leaving the Palestinians defenseless in front of Israel's military.

(COMMENT)

The importance of the action (in sound bites) is an often small line, publicly announced, but not focused upon by the media, do to other headline events.

※ 02/27/1948

PAL/138

✪ It is the policy of the United Nations Palestine commission as the successor authority...​

※ 05/14/1948

A/RES/186 (S-2)

✪ Relieves the Palestine Commission from the further exercise of responsibilities under resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947​

※ 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama), UNPC

✪ The Commission has not been dissolved.
✪ In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

※ 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama), UNPC
✪ The Commission has not been dissolved.
✪ In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."

Did this liar mention what parts of Resolution 181 was implemented?

Make a list.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yeah, yeah....

Israeli bullshit, of course.

About half of the Palestinian refugees were created before any Arab army crossed over into Palestine.

(COMMENT)

These refugees were covered under the interim measures contained in the A/RES/62 (I) Refugees and Displaced Persons, for those persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 - to - 15 May 1948.

But in general - the "refugee problems" were the concern of more than just the Arab Palestinians. Contrary to popular belief, the universe does not revolve around the Palestinians.

There is no doubt that the "discussion" has at least two facets, they they can be factored down more: (1) War of Independence (Israeli nomenclature) - or - (2) "al-Nakba", the "catastrophe" (Palestinian Arab nomenclature). And these perspective views will be hard to reconcile and merge together. Just as the conflicts of pre-May '48 and post-May '48 are seen as differing periods of justification for each.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is not necessary to make a list, because on the intervention of the Arab League, no matter what else was true at the time, the Arabs initated a game changer.

※ 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama), UNPC
✪ The Commission has not been dissolved.
✪ In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."

Did this liar mention what parts of Resolution 181 was implemented?

Make a list.

(COMMENT)

For the most part, the intent of implementation was wrapped-up in the "Steps Preparatory to Independence." And since only the Jewish Agency accepted, only those parts necessary fr the establishment of Jewish Independence became a criteria. Since Israel became a reality, those minimum steps necessary to culminate into independence must have been completed.

Undoubtedly you are going to respond with that "deflection" thing you do, or the side step caim you usher in; but, yet the reality is that something was done that resulted in a correct answer = "Independence."

(SIDEBAR)

The Arab Palestinians have some gall in the challenge of the steps to independence and the implementation. The rejection to join the planning stage, in early 1947, was a rejection of any objection. The intervention of Hostile External Forces resulting in the displacement of people and territory were a direct result of their own political carelessness. The Arab Palestinians actually have very little to complain about since they declined to participate. We will never know what effective changes they could have made had they chose something other than conflict. But that was the beginning of the plunge down the drain.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Indeependent]

※ 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama), UNPC
✪ The Commission has not been dissolved.
✪ In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."

Did this liar mention what parts of Resolution 181 was implemented?

Make a list.

A Resolution is a love letter.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

It is not necessary to make a list, because on the intervention of the Arab League, no matter what else was true at the time, the Arabs initated a game changer.

※ 05/17/1948 PAL/169 Dr. Eduardo Morgan (Panama), UNPC
✪ The Commission has not been dissolved.
✪ In fact the resolution of last November 29 has been implemented."

Did this liar mention what parts of Resolution 181 was implemented?

Make a list.

(COMMENT)

For the most part, the intent of implementation was wrapped-up in the "Steps Preparatory to Independence." And since only the Jewish Agency accepted, only those parts necessary fr the establishment of Jewish Independence became a criteria. Since Israel became a reality, those minimum steps necessary to culminate into independence must have been completed.

Undoubtedly you are going to respond with that "deflection" thing you do, or the side step caim you usher in; but, yet the reality is that something was done that resulted in a correct answer = "Independence."

(SIDEBAR)

The Arab Palestinians have some gall in the challenge of the steps to independence and the implementation. The rejection to join the planning stage, in early 1947, was a rejection of any objection. The intervention of Hostile External Forces resulting in the displacement of people and territory were a direct result of their own political carelessness. The Arab Palestinians actually have very little to complain about since they declined to participate. We will never know what effective changes they could have made had they chose something other than conflict. But that was the beginning of the plunge down the drain.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Palestinians were attacked. They did not choose conflict.

 

[P F Tinmore]

There was no "cut'n'run."

They were not there to protect the people and territory in their trust.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Arab Palestinians have some gall in the challenge of the steps to independence and the implementation.

Resolution 181 was never implemented. There were no steps. The things proposes never happened.

 

[Hollie]

The Arab Palestinians have some gall in the challenge of the steps to independence and the implementation.

Resolution 181 was never implemented. There were no steps. The things proposes never happened.

Correct. As it has been relayed to you on every other occassion when you have cut and paste the above, the Arabs-Moslems refused to participate.