Breaking:Take note Conservatives. Snopes run by fraudster. Staff include porn stars and escorts

[Lewdog]

Wait, so someone that does adult videos and pictures can't be truthful? Does it need to be pointed out about the Melania pictures? Does it need to be pointed out that Trump used to go to Epstein parties? Come on... this is a weak attack.

This is what I don't get. Just because someone is a porn star, doesn't mean they aren't trustworthy. It is a perfectly legal job and many of the people questioning their trustworthiness are probably viewers of porn.

But I guess because being an adult actor isn't Christian like, so that makes them untrustworthy.

Found it.




2
The pornstar who “served” in the Italian Parliament

Come on, we had to put a porn star in the list!

Hungarian adult film star supreme Ilona Staller (a.k.a. Cicciolina) served for five years in the Italian Parliament representing the aptly named Radical Party.

La Cicciolina (“Cuddles”) was certainly unique. Never one to be shy, this blonde bombshell was the first woman to expose her breasts live on Italian TV. She often delivered speeches with one breast exposed and continued to make X-rated films while still in office! During the Gulf war, Cicciolina offered to have sex with then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in return for peace in the region. This was perhaps the highlight of her administration. She also founded the "Party of Love" – with fellow porn star Moanna Pozzi – to fight for the legalization of brothels, the formation of “love parks” and better sex education.

When her term ended in 1992, Cicciolina was not re-elected.

Perhaps she summed it up best when she stated, "My breasts have never done anyone any harm, while Bin Laden's war has caused thousands of victims."

10 Politicians With Strange Backgrounds (politics, presidents, candidates, congress, senator) - ODDEE

 

[Syriusly]

From what I've read he altered the direction of Brietbart towards a much more "white supremacist" sort of platform then it had been before. And when it is done for a political goal - it is essentially trafficking. It's using those voices - even if you don't believe in their message - to obtain a goal. That's giving them a platform and a legitimacy in the public sphere.

Ex-Breitbart Executive Brings Alt-Right Ties To The White House

Under Bannon, Breitbart spoke increasingly to that alt-right audience with headlines and stories seemingly designed to offend African-Americans, Latinos, Muslims, women, gays, transgender people and others. The site already had built a following among the more conservative wing of Republicans for its gleeful stunts and the outrageous rhetoric of its founder, the late Andrew Breitbart.

Bannon pushed the boundaries further, according to Kurt Bardella, the site's top public relations consultant for three years until his resignation earlier this year. I asked Bardella what he made of the criticism that the site published racist stories. "I thought [the criticisms] were all completely valid and all true," he responded.

Bardella argued that Bannon sought to incite Breitbart's more bigoted readers to generate more clicks and shares, more controversy and more pressure on Republicans to take nationalist and anti-immigration stands. Calls for corrections of fact or apologies for their rhetoric led Bannon to urge his writers to hold firm on their outrages, Bardella says.

The term alt-right is a meme that only recently has been used to try and propagandize against the trumpster and his supporters. The actual group alt-right, is a bunch of clowns who barely have a nickel between them. It is a paper tiger. A good friend of mine was the head of the ATF office in Fresno back in the 1970's and they had a huuuge KKK problem. He sent an undercover agent into the group and the very first day he was elected Sergeant at Arms. The next meeting they made him co-leader. The meeting after that they wanted to make him the boss. My buddy pulled him out because they had found out two things. The KKK in the central California area was nothing but a bunch of blowhards who were long on talk but real short on anything else, and the only people who were actually paying their dues were the various undercover agents that they uncovered from the local sheriffs office, the FBI, and the California DOJ.

This alt-right "movement" is the exact same thing. They are loud but the only people doing anything (if at all) will be the various undercover agents that have already infiltrated them. They are a boogeyman for the media to point at and say "see! Bad people! They're everywhere!"

So the alt-right is kind of like Soros then - a political boogeyman empowered by media attention?

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

 

[Syriusly]

The term alt-right is a meme that only recently has been used to try and propagandize against the trumpster and his supporters. The actual group alt-right, is a bunch of clowns who barely have a nickel between them. It is a paper tiger. A good friend of mine was the head of the ATF office in Fresno back in the 1970's and they had a huuuge KKK problem. He sent an undercover agent into the group and the very first day he was elected Sergeant at Arms. The next meeting they made him co-leader. The meeting after that they wanted to make him the boss. My buddy pulled him out because they had found out two things. The KKK in the central California area was nothing but a bunch of blowhards who were long on talk but real short on anything else, and the only people who were actually paying their dues were the various undercover agents that they uncovered from the local sheriffs office, the FBI, and the California DOJ.

This alt-right "movement" is the exact same thing. They are loud but the only people doing anything (if at all) will be the various undercover agents that have already infiltrated them. They are a boogeyman for the media to point at and say "see! Bad people! They're everywhere!"

So the alt-right is kind of like Soros then - a political boogeyman empowered by media attention?

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

I don't either. I just hear all these claims that he's behind every bad thing.

The claims are true. He has been a behind the scenes player for decades. Those of us who worked internationally always had to watch our backs when he got involved in some scheme. He is one of the truly evil people on this planet. Absolutely merciless, and without a shred of compassion.

And by 'evil' you apparently mean a Capitalist who ruthlessly is a Capitalist in business, and outside of business is one of the biggest philanthropists in the world.

 

[MindWars]

I will take Breitbart over a newspaper that got a Pulitzer Prize they still showcase for them defending Stalin for decades and denying that he was starving tens of millions of people to death in his own country.

Most of the Major Media in this country is provably SHIT.

They won't ever get it :

 

[Syriusly]

Christmas came early today. Check this out and make certain all your conservative friends and relatives learn that Facebook's fact checker Snopes is a fraud. that what we suspected for a long time is true. Snopes is not unbiased.

Unreal. Eat this Facebook!

EXCLUSIVE: Facebook 'fact checker' who will arbitrate on 'fake news' is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes - and its staff includes an escort-porn star and 'Vice Vixen domme'
Facebook has announced plans to check for 'fake news' using a series of

• 
  
  
  • organizations to assess whether stories are true One of them is a website called Snopes.com which claims to be one of the web's 'essential resources' and 'painstaking, scholarly and reliable'

• It was founded by husband-and-wife Barbara and David Mikkelson, who used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to start their research
• 
  
• Now they are divorced - with Barbara claiming in legal documents he embezzled $98,000 of company money and spent it on 'himself and prostitutes'
• In a lengthy and bitter legal dispute he is claiming to be underpaid and demanding 'industry standard' or at least $360,000 a year
• 
  
• The two also dispute what are basic facts of their case - despite Snopes.com saying its 'ownership' is committed to 'accuracy and impartiality'
• Snopes.com founder David Mikkelson's new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as an administrator
• 
  
• She has worked as an escort and porn actress and despite claims website is non-political ran as a Libertarian for Congress on a 'Dump Bush' platform
• 
  
• Its main 'fact checker' is Kimberly LaCapria, whose blog 'ViceVixen' says she is in touch with her 'domme side' and has posted on Snopes.com while smoking pot

Bwahahahahaha! Merry Christmas! Happy Birthday! Happy New Year!

Facebook 'fact checker' Snopes.com accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes | Daily Mail Online

Any of them pose with photos of the new First Lady?

Nah. They're escorts *cough* and porn stars. Melania was a super model. Worlds apart.

Really? Worlds apart?
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed

Are you freaking kidding me? It's what they do in Europe. K.

So you are saying that Europeans all do porn?

 

[Syriusly]

I just want to point out that this is all based upon divorce papers......

And speaking of what a former wife accuses someone of in divorce papers

Donald Trump's ex-wife once claimed he 'raped' her

Donald Trump's ex-wife's claim he 'raped' her resurfaces in new documentary
The allegation comes from a sworn deposition

What the hell are you talking about that all of this comes from divorce papers?t.

The accusation that there was anything improper comes from divorce papers- you know just like in Trump's divorce.

As far as whether a woman's sexual past should count against her- I don't think it should- again I point to Melania Trump- it is none of my business that she was in soft porn woman on woman photo shoots.

Why do you care whether some woman at Snopes was involved in porn any more than you care about what Melania Trump did?

 

[Nia88]

Wait, so someone that does adult videos and pictures can't be truthful? Does it need to be pointed out about the Melania pictures? Does it need to be pointed out that Trump used to go to Epstein parties? Come on... this is a weak attack.

This is what I don't get. Just because someone is a porn star, doesn't mean they aren't trustworthy. It is a perfectly legal job and many of the people questioning their trustworthiness are probably viewers of porn.

But I guess because being an adult actor isn't Christian like, so that makes them untrustworthy.

Found it.




2
The pornstar who “served” in the Italian Parliament

Come on, we had to put a porn star in the list!

Hungarian adult film star supreme Ilona Staller (a.k.a. Cicciolina) served for five years in the Italian Parliament representing the aptly named Radical Party.

La Cicciolina (“Cuddles”) was certainly unique. Never one to be shy, this blonde bombshell was the first woman to expose her breasts live on Italian TV. She often delivered speeches with one breast exposed and continued to make X-rated films while still in office! During the Gulf war, Cicciolina offered to have sex with then Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in return for peace in the region. This was perhaps the highlight of her administration. She also founded the "Party of Love" – with fellow porn star Moanna Pozzi – to fight for the legalization of brothels, the formation of “love parks” and better sex education.

When her term ended in 1992, Cicciolina was not re-elected.

Perhaps she summed it up best when she stated, "My breasts have never done anyone any harm, while Bin Laden's war has caused thousands of victims."

10 Politicians With Strange Backgrounds (politics, presidents, candidates, congress, senator) - ODDEE

Its obvious the Italians are more sensible and progressive. I can't imagine if someone like Jenna Jameson or Sasha Grey wanted to run for Congress or senate. People here in the US would explode.

 

[Syriusly]

[
So if you want to believe Ivanka and Steve Bannon's ex, we are free to believe Mr. Snopes ex wife.

You know what's good for the goose and all that.

Frankly i don't know what the facts are- I do know that we have an example of Donald Trump being accused of rape by his own wife in a divorce filing.

And we have an accusation of a crime in the divorce filing between the founders of Snopes.

Either might be true- either might be false. We don't know- but I sure heard lots of Trump supporters tell me that people say all sorts of shit in bitter divorce proceedings.

The bottom line in all of this is that this attack on Snopes is because the Right hates how Snopes has accurately shown the lies of the Right to be lies so many times.

Even though Snopes has disproven lies by both the Left and the Right- it is the Right who has always attacked Snopes because the Right likes to stifle dissent from their story line.

 

[Coyote]

Here's what Wiki says about Soros: George Soros - Wikipedia

George Soros (/ˈsɔːroʊs/[5] or /ˈsɔːrɒs/; Hungarian: Soros György, pronounced [ˈʃoroʃ ˈɟørɟ]; born August 12, 1930) is a Hungarian-American business magnate,[6][7] investor, philanthropist, political activist, and author.[a] He is chairman of Soros Fund Management. He is known as "The Man Who Broke the Bank of England" because of his short sale of US$10 billion worth of Pound sterling, making him a profit of $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis.[10][11] Soros is one of the 30 richest people in the world.[12]

Soros is a well-known supporter of American progressive and American liberal political causes.[13] Between 1979 and 2011 Soros donated more than $11 billion to various philanthropic causes.[14][15] He played a significant role in the peaceful transition from communism to capitalism in Eastern Europe in the late 1980s and early 1990s,[10] and provided one of Europe's largest higher education endowments to the Central European University in Budapest.[16] Soros is also the chairman of the Open Society Foundations.


It also states that he was Jewish, and this about his involvement with Nazi's:

Soros was 13 years old in March 1944 when Nazi Germany occupied Hungary.[25] Jewish children were barred from attending school by the Nazis, and Soros and the other schoolchildren were made to report to the Judenrat ("Jewish Council") which had been established during the occupation. Soros later described this time to writer Michael Lewis: "The Jewish Council asked the little kids to hand out the deportation notices. I was told to go to the Jewish Council. And there I was given these small slips of paper.... I took this piece of paper to my father. He instantly recognized it. This was a list of Hungarian Jewish lawyers. He said, "You deliver the slips of paper and tell the people that if they report they will be deported."[26]


Soros did not return to that job; his family purchased documents to say that they were Christians, thereby allowing them to survive the war. Later that year at age 14, Soros posed as the Christian godson of an official of the fascist Hungarian government's Ministry of Agriculture, who himself had a Jewish wife in hiding. On one occasion, rather than leave the 14 year old alone, the official took with him while he inventoried a rich Jewish family's estate, though Soros did not take part. Tivadar not only saved his immediate family but also many other Hungarian Jews, and George would later write that 1944 had been "the happiest [year] of his life," for it had given him the opportunity to witness his father's heroism.[27][28] In 1945, Soros survived the Siege of Budapest in which Soviet and German forces fought house to house through the city.​

It doesn't sound like he was so evil - at only 14, what can a kid do? It sounds like a desperate complicated situation with people trying to survive and avoid having family being captured by the Nazi's. It's hard to make judgements here.

Reading further - he certainly has his hands in a LOT of pies around the world. Not sure I'd describe him as "evil" though.

 

[Syriusly]

Reading further - he certainly has his hands in a LOT of pies around the world. Not sure I'd describe him as "evil" though.

I am not sure how Soros can be described as 'evil' without also describing Capitalism itself as evil.

I haven't really paid much attention to Soros- he seems to be the Right's boogeyman, much as the Koch Brothers are the left's boogeymen. But the 60 minutes profile showed a ruthless businessman who is trying to encourage governments to regulate business's so that businessmen like himself cannot take as much advantage of the systems- and it also showed him to be a dedicated philanthropist donating vast amounts of money to help people around the world.

 

[westwall]

The term alt-right is a meme that only recently has been used to try and propagandize against the trumpster and his supporters. The actual group alt-right, is a bunch of clowns who barely have a nickel between them. It is a paper tiger. A good friend of mine was the head of the ATF office in Fresno back in the 1970's and they had a huuuge KKK problem. He sent an undercover agent into the group and the very first day he was elected Sergeant at Arms. The next meeting they made him co-leader. The meeting after that they wanted to make him the boss. My buddy pulled him out because they had found out two things. The KKK in the central California area was nothing but a bunch of blowhards who were long on talk but real short on anything else, and the only people who were actually paying their dues were the various undercover agents that they uncovered from the local sheriffs office, the FBI, and the California DOJ.

This alt-right "movement" is the exact same thing. They are loud but the only people doing anything (if at all) will be the various undercover agents that have already infiltrated them. They are a boogeyman for the media to point at and say "see! Bad people! They're everywhere!"

So the alt-right is kind of like Soros then - a political boogeyman empowered by media attention?

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

Then you didn't watch the video which means, no surprise here, you're a liar. The very first minute of the video he describes working for the Nazi's.

 

[Coyote]

Reading further - he certainly has his hands in a LOT of pies around the world. Not sure I'd describe him as "evil" though.

I am not sure how Soros can be described as 'evil' without also describing Capitalism itself as evil.

I haven't really paid much attention to Soros- he seems to be the Right's boogeyman, much as the Koch Brothers are the left's boogeymen. But the 60 minutes profile showed a ruthless businessman who is trying to encourage governments to regulate business's so that businessmen like himself cannot take as much advantage of the systems- and it also showed him to be a dedicated philanthropist donating vast amounts of money to help people around the world.

That's pretty much what I saw as well. I don't really understand why he garners so much attention.

 

[Faun]

So the alt-right is kind of like Soros then - a political boogeyman empowered by media attention?

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

Then you didn't watch the video which means, no surprise here, you're a liar. The very first minute of the video he describes working for the Nazi's.

then you didn't understand what Soros said in that video. He never admitted to taking place with turning over Jews to be killed at any time in that interview.

 

[L.K.Eder]

What is wrong with porn stars and escorts? You will have one as flotus, lol.

 

[rightwinger]

Snopes takes conservatives to school

That is why they hate it so

 

[westwall]

Reading further - he certainly has his hands in a LOT of pies around the world. Not sure I'd describe him as "evil" though.

I am not sure how Soros can be described as 'evil' without also describing Capitalism itself as evil.

I haven't really paid much attention to Soros- he seems to be the Right's boogeyman, much as the Koch Brothers are the left's boogeymen. But the 60 minutes profile showed a ruthless businessman who is trying to encourage governments to regulate business's so that businessmen like himself cannot take as much advantage of the systems- and it also showed him to be a dedicated philanthropist donating vast amounts of money to help people around the world.

That's pretty much what I saw as well. I don't really understand why he garners so much attention.

Because no matter where you look in the world where there is a problem, he is funding the people who are causing that problem. Wiki is not a good source because it is heavily edited by his sycophants. Below are a few sources, some are conservative, some are not. None are controlled by Soros however.

George Soros: Top 10 Reasons He Is Dangerous | Human Events

George Soros - Discover the Networks

 

[Syriusly]

So the alt-right is kind of like Soros then - a political boogeyman empowered by media attention?

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

Then you didn't watch the video which means, no surprise here, you're a liar. The very first minute of the video he describes working for the Nazi's.

Then you didn't watch the video- not honestly- you are clearly just parroting the anti-Soros propaganda

The 60 Minutes interfere clearly describes his situation- for you to mis-characterize the video i is just proof you are either lying- or you didn't bother to actually watch the video.

Soros- a Hungarian Jew- was hidden by his father with a Hungarian Fascist Party member- whose wife was also Jewish. He took Soros with him on at least one occasion when the Hungarian Fascists were stealing Jewish property. Soros clearly says he did not participate.

But hey- maybe you think that a 13 year old Jew in hiding should have needlessly sacrificed his life in a futile attempt to protect the possessions of his Jewish neighbors?

Nowhere in the 60 Minutes video does he say- or does anyone accuse him of being a Nazi sympathizer or that he turned Jews in to be killed.

You just lied.

 

[jillian]

Christmas came early today. Check this out and make certain all your conservative friends and relatives learn that Facebook's fact checker Snopes is a fraud. that what we suspected for a long time is true. Snopes is not unbiased.

Unreal. Eat this Facebook!

EXCLUSIVE: Facebook 'fact checker' who will arbitrate on 'fake news' is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes - and its staff includes an escort-porn star and 'Vice Vixen domme'
Facebook has announced plans to check for 'fake news' using a series of

• 
  
  
  • organizations to assess whether stories are true One of them is a website called Snopes.com which claims to be one of the web's 'essential resources' and 'painstaking, scholarly and reliable'

• It was founded by husband-and-wife Barbara and David Mikkelson, who used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to start their research
• 
  
• Now they are divorced - with Barbara claiming in legal documents he embezzled $98,000 of company money and spent it on 'himself and prostitutes'
• In a lengthy and bitter legal dispute he is claiming to be underpaid and demanding 'industry standard' or at least $360,000 a year
• 
  
• The two also dispute what are basic facts of their case - despite Snopes.com saying its 'ownership' is committed to 'accuracy and impartiality'
• Snopes.com founder David Mikkelson's new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as an administrator
• 
  
• She has worked as an escort and porn actress and despite claims website is non-political ran as a Libertarian for Congress on a 'Dump Bush' platform
• 
  
• Its main 'fact checker' is Kimberly LaCapria, whose blog 'ViceVixen' says she is in touch with her 'domme side' and has posted on Snopes.com while smoking pot

Bwahahahahaha! Merry Christmas! Happy Birthday! Happy New Year!

Facebook 'fact checker' Snopes.com accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes | Daily Mail Online

Reality ..... try it some time

 

[westwall]

The difference being soros is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into groups who are determined to undermine the USA, and he is a self declared NAZI sympathizer who turned Jews over to the Nazi's to be killed and when asked about it he declared it to be the best time of his life..

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

Then you didn't watch the video which means, no surprise here, you're a liar. The very first minute of the video he describes working for the Nazi's.

Then you didn't watch the video- not honestly- you are clearly just parroting the anti-Soros propaganda

The 60 Minutes interfere clearly describes his situation- for you to mis-characterize the video i is just proof you are either lying- or you didn't bother to actually watch the video.

Soros- a Hungarian Jew- was hidden by his father with a Hungarian Fascist Party member- whose wife was also Jewish. He took Soros with him on at least one occasion when the Hungarian Fascists were stealing Jewish property. Soros clearly says he did not participate.

But hey- maybe you think that a 13 year old Jew in hiding should have needlessly sacrificed his life in a futile attempt to protect the possessions of his Jewish neighbors?

Nowhere in the 60 Minutes video does he say- or does anyone accuse him of being a Nazi sympathizer or that he turned Jews in to be killed.

You just lied.

Really? What does this mean silly twerp....

 

[Syriusly]

I have to admit I barely pay attention to Soros- no more than I do the Koch Brothers-

So please provide citations for your claims.

No problem.

Okay- so I watched the 60 minutes article you provided- and once again nothing there to support your claim that
a) he was a NAZI sympathizer
b) he turned Jews over to be killed or
c) That is was the best time of his life.

What did we learn from the 60 minutes program

1. He is a ruthless businessman who exploits unregulated capitalism
2. He is a devoted philanthropist who donated $500 million in a single year to foreign charities
3. He was born a Jew and his father hid him for his safety, disguising him as a Christian- with a Nazi Hungarian.

So far, you provided two links- and neither of them supported your claims.

Then you didn't watch the video which means, no surprise here, you're a liar. The very first minute of the video he describes working for the Nazi's.

Then you didn't watch the video- not honestly- you are clearly just parroting the anti-Soros propaganda

The 60 Minutes interfere clearly describes his situation- for you to mis-characterize the video i is just proof you are either lying- or you didn't bother to actually watch the video.

Soros- a Hungarian Jew- was hidden by his father with a Hungarian Fascist Party member- whose wife was also Jewish. He took Soros with him on at least one occasion when the Hungarian Fascists were stealing Jewish property. Soros clearly says he did not participate.

But hey- maybe you think that a 13 year old Jew in hiding should have needlessly sacrificed his life in a futile attempt to protect the possessions of his Jewish neighbors?

Nowhere in the 60 Minutes video does he say- or does anyone accuse him of being a Nazi sympathizer or that he turned Jews in to be killed.

You just lied.

Really? What does this mean silly twerp....A]

It means you are lying.

Then you didn't watch the video- not honestly- you are clearly just parroting the anti-Soros propaganda

The 60 Minutes interfere clearly describes his situation- for you to mis-characterize the video i is just proof you are either lying- or you didn't bother to actually watch the video.

Soros- a Hungarian Jew- was hidden by his father with a Hungarian Fascist Party member- whose wife was also Jewish. He took Soros with him on at least one occasion when the Hungarian Fascists were stealing Jewish property. Soros clearly says he did not participate.

But hey- maybe you think that a 13 year old Jew in hiding should have needlessly sacrificed his life in a futile attempt to protect the possessions of his Jewish neighbors?

Nowhere in the 60 Minutes video does he say- or does anyone accuse him of being a Nazi sympathizer or that he turned Jews in to be killed.

You just lied

Here is a transcript of the interview

KROFT: (Voiceover) You’re a Hungarian Jew…


Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.


KROFT: (Voiceover) …who escaped the Holocaust…





Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.



KROFT: (Voiceover) …by–by posing as a Christian.


Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Right.


KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.


Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that’s when my character was made.


KROFT: In what way?


Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and–and anticipate events and when–when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a–a very personal experience of evil.


KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.


Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.


KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.


Mr. SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.


KROFT: I mean, that’s–that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?


Mr. SOROS: Not–not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it was–it created no–no problem at all.


KROFT: No feeling of guilt?


Mr. SOROS: No.


KROFT: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that?


Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c–I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

Nowhere does Soros say that he was sympathetic to Nazis- you just lied.
Nowhere does it say that Soros was involved with the sending of Jews to deathcamps- you just lied.

He does say that he 'helped' in the confiscation of the property- but he also clarified later that he was only a spectator.

So my question is- why are you lying about Soros?