BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump is entitled to some immunity in Jan. 6 case

[forkup]

The impeachment clause is not all impacted by sovereignty immunity or the courts ruling. It only applies to officials acts. Official acts aren’t high crimes or misdemeanors

Like this isn’t hard to grasp, unless you want to ignore reality and push a false narrative to promote your agenda to undermine our constitution and the judicial branch

Sure it is. This court has now said. Regardless of impeachment. The president is now immune from all prosecution for all acts belonging to his "core duties." And presumptively immune for all official acts on the "outer perimeter" of his duties.

It can't be more profoundly impacted.

 

[struth]

Sure it is. This court has now said. Regardless of impeachment. The president is now immune from all prosecution for all acts belonging to his "core duties." And presumptively immune for all official acts on the "outer perimeter" of his duties.

It can't be more profoundly impacted.

Hahaha no they didn’t. The court said the president is immune from criminal prosecution for official acts.

Which aren’t high crimes and misdemeanors. Thus not impeachable

But, not if Congress did impeach, he can still be prosecuted.

You are grappling with the fact you don’t understand the law

 

[forkup]

Hahaha no they didn’t. The court said the president is immune from criminal prosecution for official acts.

Which aren’t high crimes and misdemeanors. Thus not impeachable

But, not if Congress did impeach, he can still be prosecuted.

You are grappling with the fact you don’t understand the law

So you are now claiming you can't be impeached for "official actions", that's interesting.

So a judge taking a bribe for a particular verdict, can't be impeached? What about a head of immigration not acting on his official duties?

Oh, here's a good one. What about a Vice-president pressuring a foreign government to fire a prosecutor?

You really haven't thought the position through.

There are quite a few examples off impeachments for official actions, in fact, that's most often why someone will be impeached.

 

[Rawley]

Those are extreme exaggeration scenarios,

The wise latina suggest Biden sending assassination squads after Trump. And you think rape is extreme?

but....from what i understand, he could commit criminal acts with his admin and cabinet or witnessed by them, and it would take a near miracle to charge or convict him of those crimes ...without law enforcement being able to force via subpoena his cabinet or administration to testify about the crimes they were witness or a party, to.

They can be subpoena'd and talk to law enforcement, it's just not admissible in court in a criminal prosecution of the President.

 

[pknopp]

NOT in a war zone in a foreign country.

Or Russia.

Please stop. Where the US government is concerned, yes you do.

 

[tahuyaman]

Why not? You are doing the same for past performance.

It’s never been this bad.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trumpanzee: "It's not absolute immunity!"

Also trumpanzee: "Everything he ever did involved official acts!"

Duplicitous liars.

 

[pknopp]

It’s never been this bad.

Anything you are willing to ignore will only get worse over time.

 

[tahuyaman]

Anything you are willing to ignore will only get worse over time.

Today is proof of that.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The wise latina suggest Biden sending assassination squads after Trump. And you think rape is extreme?

Rape is more extreme as there is never a legal justification for it.

The killing of an American citizen, there are often legal justification for

 

[pknopp]

Today is proof of that.

Sure. Learn anything?

 

[tahuyaman]

Sure. Learn anything?

All the current administration is doing is confirming things I already knew. It’s not something we should be celebrating.

 

[tahuyaman]

Rape is more extreme as there is never a legal justification for it.

The killing of an American citizen, there are often legal justification for

At least there’s no way now that Obama can be held criminally liable for killing American citizens in a drone strike.

 

[pknopp]

All the current administration is doing is confirming things I already knew. It’s not something we should be celebrating.

I can see you haven't learned anything.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

At least there’s no way now that Obama can be held criminally liable for killing American citizens in a drone strike.

which is a damn ******* shame.

But it seems to make you happy, so I guess congrats are in order

 

[tahuyaman]

which is a damn ******* shame.

But it seems to make you happy, so I guess congrats are in order

Why would you make such an absurd claim?

 

[Rawley]

Rape is more extreme as there is never a legal justification for it.

The killing of an American citizen, there are often legal justification for

Assassinating a political rival can be justified? Please tell me you're kidding.

 

[tahuyaman]

I can see you haven't learned anything.

I have learned that you are a hack who has no grasp of reality.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why would you make such an absurd claim?

your use of the term "at least", it normally indicates happiness

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Assassinating a political rival can be justified? Please tell me you're kidding.

Assassinating someone labeled a terrorist or enemy combatant.