Breaking! Schumer Livid As Trump To Divert 3.6 Billion In Pentagon Funds To Build The Wall

[Slade3200]

Be sure to use that excuse when President Biden pulls military funds for his climate change agenda

Climate change is not a charge of the constitution, protecting our borders is.

If biden wins, and if he wants to redirect money to a constitutional function, I dont think most people would have a problem with it

You’re joking, right? If Biden pulled this crap you all would be going nuts and screaming about executive abuse of power.

He already did that. The money might not have come from the military budget, but it did come from taxpayer's money that would have been better off going to the military.

He also didn't directly redirect the money into climate change, but was complicit in that his boss Obama did. Remember all that taxpayer's money the Obama administration gave to those 20-something "green energy" companies? The same ones who went bankrupt, costing the taxpayers billions of dollars? I remember them.

President Obama's Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures

And Joe Biden wants to go back and do the same thing over again. He has no new ideas, no solutions, and no plan. Except for repeating what Obama did.

so you were perfectly fine with all that he did and will be fine when he does it again, right?

The Party Of Filth And Foreigners does it each and every day...how do you think they care for their pet human wetbacks?

Cool, welcome to the team then!

 

[BrokeLoser]

$3.6 Billion to build a wall for political reasons alone. What a horses ass, and, let's all keep in mind that those billions are not being paid by Mexico.

Add that to the projected trillion dollar deficit which will add to the Federal Debt - so much for fiscal conservatives who pissed and moaned about Obama's spending.

LefTard Logic:
“Spending billions to protect Americans from wetbacks = BAD”
“Spending billions to care for wetbacks while they degrade our nation, rape, kill and pillage Americans = GOOD”

 

[Slade3200]

Things are gonna get stupid when the dems take over and do exactly what Trump is doing. Abusing his power and using loopholes to advance his agenda. The dems will do this with climate change and the Right is gonna go nuts... they won’t have a leg to stand on if they stay silent now about Trump

It’s called Executive Order and Executive Privilege. Obama set this precedent last go round. The Right responded and now Donald Trump is President.

Exactly... hypocrisy in action

Hypocrisy in action is calling someone wrong that you acted as right. I don’t doubt what you said as far as the Left abusing power. Obama was the root.

Right... so those who complained about Obama and now excuse Trump are clearly hypocrites

 

[karpenter]

You’re joking, right? If Biden pulled this crap you all would be going nuts and screaming about executive abuse of power.

We'd Have To See Biden Diverting Money To Build The Wall First

Furthermore:
'Hypocrite' Shaming Doesn't Work Me, Saul
'Hypocrite' Away If It Preens Your Ego
Neither Does 'Racist' Or Any Of The Other Junk

 

[OKTexas]

Way to **** over the military!

Care to provide specifics?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Things are gonna get stupid when the dems take over and do exactly what Trump is doing. Abusing his power and using loopholes to advance his agenda. The dems will do this with climate change and the Right is gonna go nuts... they won’t have a leg to stand on if they stay silent now about Trump

Never heard you crying when you dear leader took money to pay subsidies to insurance companies when congress refused to fund it. **** off commie.

.

 

[jasonnfree]

Here's trumpdog telling how mexico will pay for the wall. No conditions, no 'mexico will ultimately pay...blah blah. Wonder when his not very bright bootlickers (and worse) on this thread will realize they've been had. The guys a bum.

 

[OKTexas]

Way to **** over the military!

We don’t have a country if we don’t have borders

Which is why I have been saying for a decade that we need to put our military on the border and let them defend this nation instead of defending other nations borders.

Only if force is authorized, otherwise they're nothing but fence posts.

.

 

[White_MAGA_Man]

Here's trumpdog telling how mexico will pay for the wall. No conditions, no 'mexico will ultimately pay...blah blah. Wonder when his not very bright bootlickers (and worse) on this thread will realize they've been had. The guys a bum.

Trump has the rest of his first and second term to get Mexico to pay for it. He'll hit the Wetbacks with tax remittances. I have patience! Do you?

 

[OKTexas]

It’s against the LAW.. we aren’t supposed to have a standing military only militias.. and they arrested some militias in new Mexico for doing just that.

It is not against the law, the law says that the military cannot preform law enforcement functions. Defense of the border is not and should not be a law enforcement function.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

 

[karpenter]

Here's trumpdog telling how mexico will pay for the wall. No conditions, no 'mexico will ultimately pay...blah blah.

But I Never Cared Who Pays For It
I Just Want It Built
Illegals Are An Annual Hundreds Of $Billions Drag On Society
I'll Consider It $25 Billion Well Spent

 

[karpenter]

Trump has the rest of his first and second term to get Mexico to pay for it. He'll hit the Wetbacks with tax remittances. I have patience! Do you?

No, They Don't
Trump's Supposed To Have Everything Done Last Year

Meanwhile
California's High-Speed Rail
Is A Flop And Billions In The Red
Feinstein's Husband Made Out Well Though

 

[OKTexas]

$3.6 Billion to build a wall for political reasons alone. What a horses ass, and, let's all keep in mind that those billions are not being paid by Mexico.

Add that to the projected trillion dollar deficit which will add to the Federal Debt - so much for fiscal conservatives who pissed and moaned about Obama's spending.

Damn you lie your ass off really easily, don't you. The money has already been appropriated, it won't add a dime to the debt or deficit.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Things are gonna get stupid when the dems take over and do exactly what Trump is doing. Abusing his power and using loopholes to advance his agenda. The dems will do this with climate change and the Right is gonna go nuts... they won’t have a leg to stand on if they stay silent now about Trump

Never heard you crying when you dear leader took money to pay subsidies to insurance companies when congress refused to fund it. **** off commie.

.

I wasn’t on this board when Obama was President so of course you didn’t hear me. Plus the “you did it so I can too” argument died I’m grade school you dunce.

 

[August West]

Way to **** over the military!

I think allowing a sieve for a border is a bigger smack in the face, especially when these same soldiers fight for liberty around the world and other nations borders. Trump also achieved a raise for them along with a record $600B the last budget if I'm not mistaken.

In a country awash in mass murders less people are caring about 3 year olds in diapers immigrating.

What about a nation "awash" in Hispanic gang violence?...doesn't fit into your narrative so you ignore it?...

Hispanic gangs aren`t the threat to me and my family like Trump`s heavily armed goons. See the difference?

 

[JGalt]

It’s against the LAW.. we aren’t supposed to have a standing military only militias.. and they arrested some militias in new Mexico for doing just that.

It is not against the law, the law says that the military cannot preform law enforcement functions. Defense of the border is not and should not be a law enforcement function.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

Millions of criminals sneaking across the border isn't an "invasion"? If you entered here illegally, you're a criminal, a trespasser, and an invader.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It’s against the LAW.. we aren’t supposed to have a standing military only militias.. and they arrested some militias in new Mexico for doing just that.

It is not against the law, the law says that the military cannot preform law enforcement functions. Defense of the border is not and should not be a law enforcement function.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

Millions of criminals sneaking across the border isn't an "invasion"? If you entered here illegally, you're a criminal, a trespasser, and an invader.

Which is why the military should be defending the border.

 

[Jitss617]

It’s against the LAW.. we aren’t supposed to have a standing military only militias.. and they arrested some militias in new Mexico for doing just that.

It is not against the law, the law says that the military cannot preform law enforcement functions. Defense of the border is not and should not be a law enforcement function.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

Millions of criminals sneaking across the border isn't an "invasion"? If you entered here illegally, you're a criminal, a trespasser, and an invader.

Which is why the military should be defending the border.

No we need militias.. you ready to join for your country?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is not against the law, the law says that the military cannot preform law enforcement functions. Defense of the border is not and should not be a law enforcement function.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

Millions of criminals sneaking across the border isn't an "invasion"? If you entered here illegally, you're a criminal, a trespasser, and an invader.

Which is why the military should be defending the border.

No we need militias.. you ready to join for your country?

Already did little man, 20 years in the Marine Corps while you were home jacking off to porn on your computer

 

[Jitss617]

18 U.S.C. § 1385 only prohibits the use of the Army and Air Force as posse comitatus and while 10 U.S.C. § 375 prohibits direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, it doesn't mention the National Guard.

They can be mobilized at the request of a state governor.

Repelling invasions it doesn't apply.

.

Millions of criminals sneaking across the border isn't an "invasion"? If you entered here illegally, you're a criminal, a trespasser, and an invader.

Which is why the military should be defending the border.

No we need militias.. you ready to join for your country?

Already did little man, 20 years in the Marine Corps while you were home jacking off to porn on your computer

Thank you for your service! I was denied 3 times because of a felony I picked up when I was 17, they deemed to dangerous for the military.