BREAKING : President Trump was 100% Correct about the DC Aircraft Crash - DEI KILLS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In other words, no.

No, you have no proof that she was flying that helicopter due to any DEI programs. You're basically working off conspiracy theories here, which is the realm of the low thinkers. When you say "obviously" it means you've made assumptions but have no proof.

This is not a surprise.
I take it that none of your family members was injured in the Biden Junta disaster
 
I don't know why, are you thinking that the military run by Trump and Hegs that is trying to get rid of any trace of DEI somehow went against itself by withholding releasing information since it could show she was a DEI case? That makes no sense.
The failing NY Times is the one witholding the information.
 
Why then the 90 day delay ?

Her Social Media Accounts have been SCRUBBED , why?



Maybe they wanted to be super sure they were right, and went checking their sources and then double checking their sources.

Maybe her social media was scrubbed because any one who gets targeted by Trump had better watch out.
 
The failing NY TIMES sat on the story for over 3 months . Now they finally disclosed that On the night of January 29, Army Black Hawk pilot Capt. Rebecca Lobach was conducting an annual flight evaluation with her co-pilot Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who was serving as her flight instructor.

View attachment 1106220

Her MALE instructor told her REPETEADLY NOT TO EXCEED the 200 feet allowed altitute and to remain to the LEFT of the air corridor. SHE FAILED OR REFUSED. 100% PILOT ERROR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DEI KILLS


DEI. Defined as: any non anglo Britannic heterosexual male.
 
The failing NY TIMES sat on the story for over 3 months . Now they finally disclosed that On the night of January 29, Army Black Hawk pilot Capt. Rebecca Lobach was conducting an annual flight evaluation with her co-pilot Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who was serving as her flight instructor.

View attachment 1106220

Her MALE instructor told her REPETEADLY NOT TO EXCEED the 200 feet allowed altitute and to remain to the LEFT of the air corridor. SHE FAILED OR REFUSED. 100% PILOT ERROR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DEI KILLS


Cockpit voice recordings revealed that sometime after assuming control, Lobach announced an altitude of 300 feet. Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Lloyd Eaves, her instructor, responded within a space of 39 seconds that they actually had an altitude of 400 feet — not only double the maximum height permissible near Runway 33 but 100 feet over the altitude mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration for that part of the route


 
The failing NY TIMES sat on the story for over 3 months . Now they finally disclosed that On the night of January 29, Army Black Hawk pilot Capt. Rebecca Lobach was conducting an annual flight evaluation with her co-pilot Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who was serving as her flight instructor.

View attachment 1106220

Her MALE instructor told her REPETEADLY NOT TO EXCEED the 200 feet allowed altitute and to remain to the LEFT of the air corridor. SHE FAILED OR REFUSED. 100% PILOT ERROR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DEI KILLS


I have to disagree with many on this. I don't know the whole story from the beginning but just because she was a female doesn't mean she only got there due to DEI. While she was probably responsible for the accident and apparently didn't follow instructions, the right can't really prove she was in her position due to DEI. Maybe she was, maybe she wasn't. But, just because she was female, doesn't really prove it. She may have been more qualified than the males around her and just royally fucked up, as men can also do.
 
I don't know the whole story from the beginning but just because she was a female doesn't mean she only got there due to DEI
The Facts

1- The Transcript shows that she was told several times that she could not go above the 200 feet altitude ;
2- That she was told that she had to remain to the Left of the Reagan International DC Corridor
3- She knew or should have known that the Reagan International corridor is tight and one of the busiest in the nation;
4- the facts shows that she was one of Biden's favorite aides
5- someone who was chosen ON THE MERITS would have been exercised due diligence
 
The Facts

1- The Transcript shows that she was told several times that she could not go above the 200 feet altitude ;
2- That she was told that she had to remain to the Left of the Reagan International DC Corridor
3- She knew or should have known that the Reagan International corridor is tight and one of the busiest in the nation;
4- the facts shows that she was one of Biden's favorite aides
5- someone who was chosen ON THE MERITS would have been exercised due diligence
1, 2, and 3 mean nothing. They have nothing to do with her being in that position. All they show is incompetence, which some males also have.

#5 you don't know that. Maybe everyone in her class were equally inept, including males.

I'll give you #4 if it is true. #4 is your only relevant response if she were promoted over others just because of her connection to Biden (and being female).

The question has nothing to do with the accident. The question is, was she promoted due to DEI or not? Just because she is a woman doesn't automatically mean she was promoted due to DEI. There have been many male pilots who were in accidents due to being incompetent.
 
~~~~~~
It appears that voice recording shows Lobach was piloting the B.H. Helicopter because she verbally responded to the ATC at least twice before ignoring the commands to descend and turn.
So not responding is proof it was a DEI program? Are you retarded?
 
I take it that none of your family members was injured in the Biden Junta disaster
I take it you believe this red herring will somehow prove she was a DEI hire? It won't, stop being an idiot.
 
The failing NY Times is the one witholding the information.
Ahh a conspiracy theory. Great answer when you have no proof and lack the critical thinking skills to put together a coherent argument.
 
Why then the 90 day delay ?

Her Social Media Accounts have been SCRUBBED , why?
Which of these two questions answers the question about proof?

Neither. Why? Because you have none, just someone trying to connect dots to support their political views.
 
Which of these two questions answers the question about proof?

Neither. Why? Because you have none, just someone trying to connect dots to support their political views.

You seem very committed to doing just that.
 
Back
Top Bottom