WaitingFor2020
Gold Member
- Banned
- #241
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
BREAKING: Obama Lied Under Oath
- Thread starter cereal_killer
- Start date
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
WaitingFor2020
Gold Member
- Banned
- #243
When will Assange be extradited back to Sweden to face both of his rape charges?
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
you dumb fuckers are all the same
Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government
you should google it sometime so you dont look so ******* stupid
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
These people are like silly putty, you can shape them any way you want with the right manipulation.
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
man are you are a low functioning retard
the 4th amendment applies to the government
not private citizens
keep yappin your trap
you make yourself look even more stupid with each post
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
hey retards read up
Searches by Civilians and Police Agents
“[T]he protection of the Fourth Amendment . . . does not extend to searches conducted by private persons.”1 ivilians sometimes discover evidence of a crime and turn it over to officers. Usually it’s a weapon, drugs, stolen property, or some type of document. But whatever it is, officers seldom need to worry about how the civilian located it or whether it will be suppressed. That’s because, even if was acquired by means of an illegal search, it cannot ordinarily be suppressed unless it was obtained by a sworn officer or some other government employee.
http://le.alcoda.org/publications/files/NONPOLICESEARCHES.pdf
unless they worked for the feds it is admissible
Searches by Civilians and Police Agents
“[T]he protection of the Fourth Amendment . . . does not extend to searches conducted by private persons.”1 ivilians sometimes discover evidence of a crime and turn it over to officers. Usually it’s a weapon, drugs, stolen property, or some type of document. But whatever it is, officers seldom need to worry about how the civilian located it or whether it will be suppressed. That’s because, even if was acquired by means of an illegal search, it cannot ordinarily be suppressed unless it was obtained by a sworn officer or some other government employee.
http://le.alcoda.org/publications/files/NONPOLICESEARCHES.pdf
unless they worked for the feds it is admissible
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
oh oh jabber jaws
no wonder you dummies will vote for hillary
your too stupid to think
United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 113 [“[The Fourth Amendment] is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
no wonder you dummies will vote for hillary
your too stupid to think
United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 113 [“[The Fourth Amendment] is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
The authorities didnt obtain the information illegally.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Sorry that we feel the need to keep a wildcard when it comes to government corruption,and after the last 18 wikileaks dumps it appears to be a wise decision.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Sorry thats already been debunked. Which is the primary reason you dont hear the DNC crying foul.
Interim DNC Chair Donna Brazile CAUGHT
GWV5903
Gold Member
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,414
- 2,180
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,414
- 2,180
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,414
- 2,180
Assange is connected with Putin only by douche bag Hillary drones like you. The rest of us haven't been fooled.
tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
Maybe hillary gave em the emails
Scorpion
VIP Member
Must be why he's on ignore.......
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
Evidence of WHAT.
There's nothing there that would cause anyone to lose a moment's sleep. What exactly do you think you caught people saying?
tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
say what???????
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Deep Red Maryland county angry over ICE detention center- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 0
-
-
Iranian Warship Surrenders to Sri Lankans, First Time Ship Interned By Neutral Nation Since Second World War- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
Virginia Going Full Mao - Force Schools to Teach J6 Was an Insurrection with no Reference to 'Peaceful Protest'- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 12
-
U.N. condemnation of Iran's bloodlust and international aggression? If not now, when?- Started by JBG
- Replies: 3
