Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this is the samething as Palins Targets.
Yes she didnt actually mean for the woman to be shot, but it was a nasty coincidence that it happened.
As of right now samething, Now in the future could that mean it was a hit? Sure, Deaths can be easily fudged. Not really that hard to do, if you know the right people.
The timing on this is bad, regardless of who it is. Nobody can deny this, and the cops saying no foul play is meaningless seeing how they are dirty as well.
That fucking did absolutly did happen here. When word got out, she sure as hell did sidestep this.
I still cant figure you out...hack, liar, troll, what?
Of course you can't figure me out.... you lack the intellectual capacity to figure out how to turn on a tap, so you have no chance understanding that no one can claim that I 'approve of that shit' without evidence. There is no evidence, and Shallow cannot 'know' what I approve or disapprove of.
He's a liar.
You're an idiot.
Two More Arizonians Join Jan Brewer
Jan Brewer is such an extremist that she would rather see people in her own state die than betray her corporatist ideology. It is not Obamacare that has so killed two Arizonians who were waiting for organ transplants that never came. It was BrewerÂ’s lack of care that led to their deaths.
You look so damn dumb here, its not even funny anymore. I live here and was all over this crap when it happened.
You will DEFEND ANY AND EVERY FUCKING RIGHT WING NUT THERE IS. You really do look like a fool here.
mudwhistle, how did the story on FOX that you just saw go? What they say exactly? How was the coverage?
Give or take, of course.
That fucking did absolutly did happen here. When word got out, she sure as hell did sidestep this.
I still cant figure you out...hack, liar, troll, what?
Of course you can't figure me out.... you lack the intellectual capacity to figure out how to turn on a tap, so you have no chance understanding that no one can claim that I 'approve of that shit' without evidence. There is no evidence, and Shallow cannot 'know' what I approve or disapprove of.
He's a liar.
You're an idiot.
Only a fool would speculate on something like this having seen such little evidence....
This is how people think these days. Speculate - and call those who disagree with you 'liar'.It's funny, and kind of scary.
tsk tsk
this is the samething as Palins Targets.
Yes she didnt actually mean for the woman to be shot, but it was a nasty coincidence that it happened.
As of right now samething, Now in the future could that mean it was a hit? Sure, Deaths can be easily fudged. Not really that hard to do, if you know the right people.
The timing on this is bad, regardless of who it is. Nobody can deny this, and the cops saying no foul play is meaningless seeing how they are dirty as well.
And the police captain (I think that was his title) quit. Suddenly. They have a mess over there. All because of Murdoch's paper. Murdoch = fox dont foget.
this is the samething as Palins Targets.
Yes she didnt actually mean for the woman to be shot, but it was a nasty coincidence that it happened.
As of right now samething, Now in the future could that mean it was a hit? Sure, Deaths can be easily fudged. Not really that hard to do, if you know the right people.
The timing on this is bad, regardless of who it is. Nobody can deny this, and the cops saying no foul play is meaningless seeing how they are dirty as well.
And the police captain (I think that was his title) quit. Suddenly. They have a mess over there. All because of Murdoch's paper. Murdoch = fox dont foget.
Eh, i have trouble with pinning this on Murdoch. There is no direct evidence,and i doubt you will find any.
this is the samething as Palins Targets.
Yes she didnt actually mean for the woman to be shot, but it was a nasty coincidence that it happened.
As of right now samething, Now in the future could that mean it was a hit? Sure, Deaths can be easily fudged. Not really that hard to do, if you know the right people.
The timing on this is bad, regardless of who it is. Nobody can deny this, and the cops saying no foul play is meaningless seeing how they are dirty as well.
And the police captain (I think that was his title) quit. Suddenly. They have a mess over there. All because of Murdoch's paper. Murdoch = fox dont foget.
Eh, i have trouble with pinning this on Murdoch. There is no direct evidence,and i doubt you will find any.
So, in fact, you lied. Good to know.
And so did Grayson.
Hack
Lied about what?
Jan Brewer pulled the funding on 2 previously approved medical procedures when she took office. They were already provisioned..and she pulled it.
Both people died.
I know you approve of that shit.
I don't.
More lies. Kewl! You really are determined to shred that credibility you once had, aren't you?![]()
Of course you can't figure me out.... you lack the intellectual capacity to figure out how to turn on a tap, so you have no chance understanding that no one can claim that I 'approve of that shit' without evidence. There is no evidence, and Shallow cannot 'know' what I approve or disapprove of.
He's a liar.
You're an idiot.
Two More Arizonians Join Jan Brewer
Jan Brewer is such an extremist that she would rather see people in her own state die than betray her corporatist ideology. It is not Obamacare that has so killed two Arizonians who were waiting for organ transplants that never came. It was Brewer’s lack of care that led to their deaths.
You look so damn dumb here, its not even funny anymore. I live here and was all over this crap when it happened.
You will DEFEND ANY AND EVERY FUCKING RIGHT WING NUT THERE IS. You really do look like a fool here.
He claimed that I approve. Where is the link to my approval?
What makes this BS news Tonto?
Maybe he was a journalist with a conscience?
So we now know he was not a conservative.
still waiting on foxnews.com
I guess they are doing some fact checking on this, huh?
What makes this BS news Tonto?
Because they think it makes a conservative news origination look ‘bad.’ A knee –jerk circling of the wagons, as it were.
Maybe he was a journalist with a conscience?
So we now know he was not a conservative.
Well played.
still waiting on foxnews.com
I guess they are doing some fact checking on this, huh?
lol...
Conservatives/Fox apologists must concede the fact that this is way out of control and their pathetic efforts to spin can do noting to contain it.
Are you gonna concede that there is not one allegation against Fox News for any unethical behavior?
Are you gonna concede that there is not one allegation against Fox News for any unethical behavior?
While that is true, they're all part of the same corporation.
And the big boss man is responsible for the actions of his underlings.
Yea, he is.... but Fox News are not responsible for the actions of the other outlets. That's rational, right?
Murdoch can go to hell in a handbasket as far as I am concerned. It would be difficult for me to care less about his fate.... other than - if charges are laid, and he is tried and convicted - I'd love to see him go to prison. I'd laugh.
Yea, he is.... but Fox News are not responsible for the actions of the other outlets. That's rational, right?
Murdoch can go to hell in a handbasket as far as I am concerned. It would be difficult for me to care less about his fate.... other than - if charges are laid, and he is tried and convicted - I'd love to see him go to prison. I'd laugh.
No, I'm with you there, and someone very close to me works for another part of Murdoch's sprawling empire, and that company also has little to do with this.
But Murdoch himself is culpable for whatever did or did not happen.
And, again, I would not make any accusations about the death of this whistle-blower. I have no facts to base them on...
But it sure as hell looks mighty suspicious.![]()
Facts:
1. A scandal emerges, implicating British police and a giant media empire in criminal acts. Said media empire had close ties to the Prime Minister of England.
2. A whistle-blower who was the main source for much of the original information in the scandal suddenly shows up dead, not long after implying he may have more damning information.
Now, I am not going to make any snap judgements here, but I will say this:
If this were, say, Andrew Breitbart, and he uncovered the same type of story that involved people close to the President, and he showed up dead...
You can be DAMN sure right-wing types would be screaming their heads off about it.
Conservative commentators would be on this story 24/7, ranting and raving about murder and conspiracy.
What makes this BS news Tonto?
Because they think it makes a conservative news origination look ‘bad.’ A knee –jerk circling of the wagons, as it were.
Well played.
still waiting on foxnews.com
I guess they are doing some fact checking on this, huh?
lol...
Conservatives/Fox apologists must concede the fact that this is way out of control and their pathetic efforts to spin can do noting to contain it.
Are you gonna concede that there is not one allegation against Fox News for any unethical behavior?
Because they think it makes a conservative news origination look ‘bad.’ A knee –jerk circling of the wagons, as it were.
Well played.
lol...
Conservatives/Fox apologists must concede the fact that this is way out of control and their pathetic efforts to spin can do noting to contain it.
Are you gonna concede that there is not one allegation against Fox News for any unethical behavior?
FBI is looking into phone hacks of 9/11 victims.
I am sure you will defend that either way.
Oh.The reason this story has such short legs thus far is the terminology assigned to the offense(s) under investigation. The media is calling it "phone hacking," which is a relatively amorphous term. The word "hacking" evokes images of mischievous teen-agers breaking into other's computers for the hell of it.I missed the first season of this soap opera. What happened now? Who hacked what and why should I care?
The proper word for what is being investigated is systematic wiretapping, which is what brought the Nixon Administration down. The major difference in this example is the scope of the illegal activity dwarfs the Nixon scandal. At this point it is believed that high-level officials in the British government and Scotland Yard are involved in a massive conspiracy to unlawfully invade the privacy of thousand if not millions of people, possibly including Americans.