BREAKING NEWS: Biden pardons his son

Well that's false.

The Nixon pardon comes to mind.

Or Bush pardoning Iran-Contra figures.
Or Clinton pardoning Whitewater figures.
Or Trump pardoning Russian Collusion figures.

All these cases were brought because someone thought they could get at the president by going after his associates, even though at the end of the day, no case could be made against the president himself for wrongdoing. Most of these cases were kind of dubious. (Yes, even Iran Contra).

So a prosecutor went after Hunter because they wanted to validate conspiracy theories against his father. They came up with nothing against Biden himself. They could even prove the more outrageous things they accused Hunter of.
 
Sure, for crimes they have committed, and have been convicted for. What biden did was a whole new level, pardoning someone for crimes not yet charged or convicted of.
Yep, when he included the time period going back to 2014, that's exactly what he did. It also admits guilt by doing so.
 
Or Bush pardoning Iran-Contra figures.
Or Clinton pardoning Whitewater figures.
Or Trump pardoning Russian Collusion figures.

All these cases were brought because someone thought they could get at the president by going after his associates, even though at the end of the day, no case could be made against the president himself for wrongdoing. Most of these cases were kind of dubious. (Yes, even Iran Contra).

So a prosecutor went after Hunter because they wanted to validate conspiracy theories against his father. They came up with nothing against Biden himself. They could even prove the more outrageous things they accused Hunter of.
Russian collusion figures pardoned ? 😆

You have lost your mind. Russian collusion was a hoax.
 
No, he was impeached for holding up weapons shipments to a country that was under attack for trying to drum up a fake investigation.

That's why he was impeached.
Are you some kind of propaganda arm of the DNC ? Where do you all meet to get your false narratives, talking points, and information manipulator points briefings ??? No way are you doing this on your own.
 
Or Bush pardoning Iran-Contra figures.
Or Clinton pardoning Whitewater figures.
Or Trump pardoning Russian Collusion figures.

All these cases were brought because someone thought they could get at the president by going after his associates, even though at the end of the day, no case could be made against the president himself for wrongdoing. Most of these cases were kind of dubious. (Yes, even Iran Contra).

So a prosecutor went after Hunter because they wanted to validate conspiracy theories against his father. They came up with nothing against Biden himself. They could even prove the more outrageous things they accused Hunter of.
When you end up being exposed as a possible DNC agent of chaos, and your cronies are exposed one right after the other, it's going to be one great day for usmessage board and beyond.
 
When you end up being exposed as a possible DNC agent of chaos, and your cronies are exposed one right after the other, it's going to be one great day for usmessage board and beyond.
Well, this is the most freakish and insane horseshit I will read all day. Thanks for the laugh. I knew you people were crazy. But one has to marvel and giggle at your special, hilarious brand of crazy.
 
Last edited:
Russian collusion figures pardoned ? 😆

You have lost your mind. Russian collusion was a hoax.

Then why did Manfort, Flynn, and Papodopolous need pardons?

When you end up being exposed as a possible DNC agent of chaos, and your cronies are exposed one right after the other, it's going to be one great day for usmessage board and beyond.

I'm proud to be an agent of chaos... just not one for the DNC...
 
And still unable to make a cogent statement backed by fact and logic. You truly are a democrat.
The above is a perfect Rush Limbaugh MAGA tactic: an accusation is almost always a confession.
 
I've been pretty much on point.

So let's recap.

Never before have we seen a case of going after a family member to get at a politician. There had been a rule up to this point that kids are off-limits.

So a Trump appointed prosecutor files a bullshit case, and a Trump appointed judge blows up a perfectly sensible deal, followed by a trial where his right to defense was repeatedly denied.

How could he NOT issue a pardon under those circumstances?
First, the trump kids have been gone after. Funny how that does not fir your narrative.

Second, Hunter plead guilty to all charges. After his BS plea deal was denied.


Third, Biden said he would never pardon Hunter and then did.

A further proof of political malfeasance.

In words you may understand, he lied for personal reason, not for the government or well being of the people.

How is that for a recap for you? You know, the truth not what you have been told.
 
15th post
Then why did Manfort, Flynn, and Papodopolous need pardons?



I'm proud to be an agent of chaos... just not one for the DNC...
Manafort, Flynn, and Papodopolis ? Conflating everything or tying things together in your TDS world is on you agent 99... 😆
 
Again, I never argued otherwise. That wasn't the discussion. Your argument was that spending for show trials didn't matter.




We can also address it with higher taxes as that is three fold. It will pay down the debt, removes money from the system and stops people from ignoring the ever rising debt if they think they will be on the hook for even more taxes to pay for it.

Again, I never argued otherwise. That wasn't the discussion. Your argument was that spending for show trials didn't matter.

Not really a show trial. There is probably actually something there. It doesn't matter because the amount would be insignificant compared to what we spend on the budget each year, and the left were all for it when they were throwing money away going after trump.



We can also address it with higher taxes as that is three fold. It will pay down the debt, removes money from the system and stops people from ignoring the ever rising debt if they think they will be on the hook for even more taxes to pay for it.

No, that's not how it works. Increase taxes and they find a way to spend more, eventually we end up right back at the start. At some point, you can't tax anymore.

We already work for free 20 to 40% of the time, when you factor state and local taxes, plus taxes on ALL goods and services, it's probably more than 20 to 40%. How much more should we take from the people?

Cutting spending is the only way to fix this mess.
 
Back
Top Bottom