Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 64,363
- 55,245
- 3,615
Asked and answered, Stupid.Trump appointed nearly 300 judges.
Where should Smith have conducted the investigation?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asked and answered, Stupid.Trump appointed nearly 300 judges.
Where should Smith have conducted the investigation?
Announcing more of your ignorance, I see.Trump is complaining about 2 judges. Which ones did he appoint?
Florida. That's where he preferred the charges.Where should he have conducted the investigation?
The liberals would have been supporting British.By who, your ancestors?
You extremist morons are too much. Where did I say all? He accused one that should recuse herself and you immediately go to the opposite extreme. You are the reason that conservatives call ALL democrats LIARS. You resemble that term.I know. I have served on 7 or 8 juries.. So what is Trump's problem? He's accusing all his judges of bias.
I've suspected as much for some time. I wish these foreign bastards would just back the fuck out of American domestic policy discussions. They apparently don't like wherever they come from but all they can do is try to turn America into the shithole they left.Surada is not even an American citizen.
You couldn't have said it better.I've suspected as much for some time. I wish these foreign bastards would just back the fuck out of American domestic policy discussions. They apparently don't like wherever they come from but all they can do is try to turn America into the shithole they left.
Fits right in with all the MAGAts wanting fascism, eh?
Exactly what _is_ Cannon babbling about?
She seems to be trying to get herself disqualified.
Post #100. She made up a complete bullshit reason to disqualify evidence, a reason directly contradicted by the actual law.So tell us exactly how what she said is grounds for disqualification.
What bullshit? Contradicted by WHAT SPECIFIC LAW?Post #100. She made up a complete bullshit reason to disqualify evidence, a reason directly contradicted by the actual law.
You losers might try actually reading the thread. Post 100.What bullshit? Contradicted by WHAT SPECIFIC LAW?
But that's what Jack Smith is doing. He's got to respond why to the ethical prestigious non biased Judge Eileen Cannon.There's no point in convening another grand jury to find out what another grand jury already determined.
And like I said, that only takes one sentence.But that's what Jack Smith is doing. He's got to respond why to the ethical prestigious non biased Judge Eileen Cannon.a
Bottom line, Smith needs to abide by her request.And like I said, that only takes one sentence.
Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.
Link?Judge Cannon is an affirmative action pick.
Jack Smith is among the best in the world.
This contest isn't close.
I see the Trump cultists, being true to their fundamentally gutless and dishonest natures, don't want to address my post that explains just how Cannon botched it so hard. You know Smith's whole office was laughing hard at Cannon's faceplant. "She did WHAT? You have to be kidding! She can't actually be that inept, can she?"
At this stage, it's just a question of whether Smith wants to move forward with getting her dismissed now, or if he wants to document her pattern of unethical behavior with more examples.
You losers might try actually reading the thread. Post 100.
Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.
That's common sense, dumbasses. There's no point in convening another grand jury to find out what another grand jury already determined.