BREAKING: Judge Cannon asks defense to raise possible grand jury abuse by Jack Smith for conducting nearly all of the investigation in DC

[Nostra]

Trump appointed nearly 300 judges.

Where should Smith have conducted the investigation?

Asked and answered, Stupid.

 

[Nostra]

Trump is complaining about 2 judges. Which ones did he appoint?

Announcing more of your ignorance, I see.

 

[Nostra]

Jack Smith doesn’t look Hispanic.

So why is his first name pronounced “Hack”?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Where should he have conducted the investigation?

Florida. That's where he preferred the charges.

 

[AZrailwhale]

By who, your ancestors?

The liberals would have been supporting British.

 

[Concerned American]

I know. I have served on 7 or 8 juries.. So what is Trump's problem? He's accusing all his judges of bias.

You extremist morons are too much. Where did I say all? He accused one that should recuse herself and you immediately go to the opposite extreme. You are the reason that conservatives call ALL democrats LIARS. You resemble that term.

 

[Concerned American]

Surada is not even an American citizen.

I've suspected as much for some time. I wish these foreign bastards would just back the **** out of American domestic policy discussions. They apparently don't like wherever they come from but all they can do is try to turn America into the shithole they left.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

I've suspected as much for some time. I wish these foreign bastards would just back the **** out of American domestic policy discussions. They apparently don't like wherever they come from but all they can do is try to turn America into the shithole they left.

You couldn't have said it better.

 

[Billiejeens]

Fits right in with all the MAGAts wanting fascism, eh?

MAGA is exact opposite Fascism.

 

[mamooth]

Judge Cannon is an affirmative action pick.

Jack Smith is among the best in the world.

This contest isn't close.

I see the Trump cultists, being true to their fundamentally gutless and dishonest natures, don't want to address my post that explains just how Cannon botched it so hard. You know Smith's whole office was laughing hard at Cannon's faceplant. "She did WHAT? You have to be kidding! She can't actually be that inept, can she?"

At this stage, it's just a question of whether Smith wants to move forward with getting her dismissed now, or if he wants to document her pattern of unethical behavior with more examples.

 

[Resnic]

Exactly what _is_ Cannon babbling about?

She seems to be trying to get herself disqualified.

So tell us exactly how what she said is grounds for disqualification.

 

[mamooth]

So tell us exactly how what she said is grounds for disqualification.

Post #100. She made up a complete bullshit reason to disqualify evidence, a reason directly contradicted by the actual law.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Post #100. She made up a complete bullshit reason to disqualify evidence, a reason directly contradicted by the actual law.

What bullshit? Contradicted by WHAT SPECIFIC LAW?

 

[mamooth]

What bullshit? Contradicted by WHAT SPECIFIC LAW?

You losers might try actually reading the thread. Post 100.

Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.

That's common sense, dumbasses. There's no point in convening another grand jury to find out what another grand jury already determined.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

There's no point in convening another grand jury to find out what another grand jury already determined.

But that's what Jack Smith is doing. He's got to respond why to the ethical prestigious non biased Judge Eileen Cannon.

 

[mamooth]

But that's what Jack Smith is doing. He's got to respond why to the ethical prestigious non biased Judge Eileen Cannon.a

And like I said, that only takes one sentence.

Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

And like I said, that only takes one sentence.

Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.

Bottom line, Smith needs to abide by her request.

 

[Nostra]

Judge Cannon is an affirmative action pick.

Jack Smith is among the best in the world.

This contest isn't close.

I see the Trump cultists, being true to their fundamentally gutless and dishonest natures, don't want to address my post that explains just how Cannon botched it so hard. You know Smith's whole office was laughing hard at Cannon's faceplant. "She did WHAT? You have to be kidding! She can't actually be that inept, can she?"

At this stage, it's just a question of whether Smith wants to move forward with getting her dismissed now, or if he wants to document her pattern of unethical behavior with more examples.

Link?

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Update!


BREAKING: Judge Cannon DENIES Jack Smith’s motion to file documents in Trump docs case ‘under seal’

 

[Resnic]

You losers might try actually reading the thread. Post 100.

Grand Jury Rule 6(e)(3)(C), explicitly states: (C) An attorney for the government may disclose any grand-jury matter to another federal grand jury.

That's common sense, dumbasses. There's no point in convening another grand jury to find out what another grand jury already determined.

Well I read it, have to say the name calling and immature bashing of others for no apparent reason doesnt lend you any value or credibility.

That doesn't really have anything to do with though. All what you said was that they are able to transfer to another jury. Doesn't address the core issue at all of the topic of this thread. Given how you keep copying and pasting it over and over again in here im guessing you saw someone else post it somewhere and it sounded good so you just keep repeating it thinking it makes you sound whitty and savvy.