BREAKING: Johns Hopkins & American College of Pediatricians Formerly Denounce Sex-Change Procedures

[Silhouette]

See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A cheek swab would determine the sex of the person in the photo. If it is "Jazz", the sex is xy or male.

She's XY, and has always looked and been treated as female so, that's a boy? Gonna stand on that?

Absolutely, firmly and unwaveringly YES. XY is male.

Okay, so this is female then?

And the two above, who look just like you do when naked, you want in the boy's locker room? Fun, for the boys that is...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.

Seems you're not sure what is or isn't male? You say XY, and then I show you XY females. You say XX, and I show you XX males? You'd better make up for your mind, young lady...

Biology 442, Human Genetics -Sexual Differentiation

 

[Silhouette]

Again, a cheek swab determines whether or not corrective treatment or surgery is warranted. "Extremely rare" (see OP #1) genetic anomalies are not part of the normal xx or xy child drugging/mutilation abuse allegations.

If a cheek swab renders an "xy" DNA register, then if any adult coerces that boy into believing he is a girl, especially if that adult drugs or help drugs that child with artificial hormones or pushes the child into amputating healthy body parts to "play at being a girl" that adult is guilty of child abuse. That is the new standard.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.

The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Again, a cheek swab determines whether or not corrective treatment or surgery is warranted. "Extremely rare" (see OP #1) genetic anomalies are not part of the normal xx or xy child drugging/mutilation abuse allegations.

If a cheek swab renders an "xy" DNA register, then if any adult coerces that boy into believing he is a girl, especially if that adult drugs or help drugs that child with artificial hormones or pushes the child into amputating healthy body parts to "play at being a girl" that adult is guilty of child abuse. That is the new standard.

What bathroom (locker room) should this XY (and has always looked female) person use?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A cheek swab would determine the sex of the person in the photo. If it is "Jazz", the sex is xy or male.

She's XY, and has always looked and been treated as female so, that's a boy? Gonna stand on that?

Absolutely, firmly and unwaveringly YES. XY is male.

Okay, so this is female then?

And the two above, who look just like you do when naked, you want in the boy's locker room? Fun, for the boys that is...

Is that a boy or a girl, J? He's XX....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.

No, the only damage being caused is by the bigotry and hate common to the social right, along with their fear of diversity and expressions of individual liberty.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.

No, the only damage being caused is by the bigotry and hate common to the social right, along with their fear of diversity and expressions of individual liberty.

It's their fear of science and rational thought in this case. God, and nature, unlike people like Sil, are not simpletons...

 

[Silhouette]

The science supports their stance Paint.

 

[Silhouette]

Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.

The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.

Please post official denouncements of the content of the OP. Feel free. Please state the institution and give a link to their publicized dissent.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.

The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.

Please post official denouncements of the content of the OP. Feel free. Please state the institution and give a link to their publicized dissent.

Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?

It's just the opinion of a tiny group.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The science supports their stance Paint.

No, it doesn't.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The science supports their stance Paint.

No, and answer the questions, chicken-shit...

 

[Silhouette]

Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?

It's just the opinion of a tiny group.

See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.

If denying a child hormones or surgery for their 'suffering' is counter to the child's welfare, then professionals who "know better" are mandated to report this denial as the "child abuse" they must logically conclude "it is"..

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?

It's just the opinion of a tiny group.

See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.

If denying a child hormones or surgery for their 'suffering' is counter to the child's welfare, then professionals who "know better" are mandated to report this denial as the "child abuse" they must logically conclude "it is"..

I don't think you should be allowed to use the word "logically", since you clearly have no idea what it means.

Having dumb opinions isn't "child abuse".

Child abuse, in the context of the law you're quoting, is an illegal physical act. Publishing a paper saying that treating children for gender dysphoria is "harmful" is not. Does that help?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?

It's just the opinion of a tiny group.

See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.

If denying a child hormones or surgery for their 'suffering' is counter to the child's welfare, then professionals who "know better" are mandated to report this denial as the "child abuse" they must logically conclude "it is"..

Who is "denying" children anything?

The paper in your OP is an opinion piece, not a "rule".

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Sil can't tell us how we define gender but transgender people are wrong (she says) even though we have XX males and XY females, who look like the what you'd expect, more of less if they were XX female and XY male. Sil, is fucked because gender isn't junk...

 

[gallantwarrior]

No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.

And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...

No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.

And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...

OK, this really is simple: biologically, an XY "female" is a MALE and an XX "male" is a FEMALE. An individual can pretend to be anything they wish, but the fact remains, they are biologically one of the other. While there are other genetic anomalies (Kleinfelter's Syndrome or XYY syndrome), they are not common and are commonly classified as anomalies when they do occur. Chemical and surgical engineering of an individual's external appearance in order to accommodate their "perceived" choice of gender fails to alter the biological FACT of their natural identity. No amount of wishing, hoping, chemical & surgical mutilation, or legislation and coercion will ever change the fact that a genetically normal XX or XY person will be anything but Female or Male.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.

And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...

No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.

And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...

OK, this really is simple: biologically, an XY "female" is a MALE and an XX "male" is a FEMALE. An individual can pretend to be anything they wish, but the fact remains, they are biologically one of the other. While there are other genetic anomalies (Kleinfelter's Syndrome or XYY syndrome), they are not common and are commonly classified as anomalies when they do occur. Chemical and surgical engineering of an individual's external appearance in order to accommodate their "perceived" choice of gender fails to alter the biological FACT of their natural identity. No amount of wishing, hoping, chemical & surgical mutilation, or legislation and coercion will ever change the fact that a genetically normal XX or XY person will be anything but Female or Male.

So, the two "girls" above, and the "boy", what locker rooms do they use and does it say, Male or Female, on their records? Go...

XY female one =
XY female two =
XX male one =