Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, so this is female then?She's XY, and has always looked and been treated as female so, that's a boy? Gonna stand on that?A cheek swab would determine the sex of the person in the photo. If it is "Jazz", the sex is xy or male.
Absolutely, firmly and unwaveringly YES. XY is male.
Seems you're not sure what is or isn't male? You say XY, and then I show you XY females. You say XX, and I show you XX males? You'd better make up for your mind, young lady...See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.
The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.
What bathroom (locker room) should this XY (and has always looked female) person use?Again, a cheek swab determines whether or not corrective treatment or surgery is warranted. "Extremely rare" (see OP #1) genetic anomalies are not part of the normal xx or xy child drugging/mutilation abuse allegations.
If a cheek swab renders an "xy" DNA register, then if any adult coerces that boy into believing he is a girl, especially if that adult drugs or help drugs that child with artificial hormones or pushes the child into amputating healthy body parts to "play at being a girl" that adult is guilty of child abuse. That is the new standard.
Is that a boy or a girl, J? He's XX....Okay, so this is female then?She's XY, and has always looked and been treated as female so, that's a boy? Gonna stand on that?A cheek swab would determine the sex of the person in the photo. If it is "Jazz", the sex is xy or male.
Absolutely, firmly and unwaveringly YES. XY is male.
And the two above, who look just like you do when naked, you want in the boy's locker room? Fun, for the boys that is...
No, the only damage being caused is by the bigotry and hate common to the social right, along with their fear of diversity and expressions of individual liberty.See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.
It's their fear of science and rational thought in this case. God, and nature, unlike people like Sil, are not simpletons...No, the only damage being caused is by the bigotry and hate common to the social right, along with their fear of diversity and expressions of individual liberty.See #1 in the OP Paint. It says that there are extremely rare exceptions to xx and xy presentations. Chromosomal disorders are not in the same abuse class a xx or xy normal kids coerced into physical and mental damage by the LGBT cult and their friends in high places.
Please post official denouncements of the content of the OP. Feel free. Please state the institution and give a link to their publicized dissent.The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.
Please post official denouncements of the content of the OP. Feel free. Please state the institution and give a link to their publicized dissent.The thread premise is idiocy – completely devoid merit, the product of ignorance, fear, bigotry, and hate.Refer to the OP folks, then ask your redundant questions.
No, and answer the questions, chicken-shit...The science supports their stance Paint.
See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?
It's just the opinion of a tiny group.
See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?
It's just the opinion of a tiny group.
If denying a child hormones or surgery for their 'suffering' is counter to the child's welfare, then professionals who "know better" are mandated to report this denial as the "child abuse" they must logically conclude "it is"..
See page 1 for why they MUST denounce it if they feel it is in error. I gave a link to the public law about child abuse on page one, post #9. Look for it. Institutions who disagree, for the sake of "child welfare" must publicly denounce the OP content.Why would anyone bother "denouncing" this?
It's just the opinion of a tiny group.
If denying a child hormones or surgery for their 'suffering' is counter to the child's welfare, then professionals who "know better" are mandated to report this denial as the "child abuse" they must logically conclude "it is"..
No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.
And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...
No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.
And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...
So, the two "girls" above, and the "boy", what locker rooms do they use and does it say, Male or Female, on their records? Go...No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.
And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...
No one is worried about the views of your loons, Sil.
And ask them to explain XY females and XX males, then XXY XXXY, XYY, XYYY, XXYY, and X0. TY...
OK, this really is simple: biologically, an XY "female" is a MALE and an XX "male" is a FEMALE. An individual can pretend to be anything they wish, but the fact remains, they are biologically one of the other. While there are other genetic anomalies (Kleinfelter's Syndrome or XYY syndrome), they are not common and are commonly classified as anomalies when they do occur. Chemical and surgical engineering of an individual's external appearance in order to accommodate their "perceived" choice of gender fails to alter the biological FACT of their natural identity. No amount of wishing, hoping, chemical & surgical mutilation, or legislation and coercion will ever change the fact that a genetically normal XX or XY person will be anything but Female or Male.
