I knew this would happen. I said even if we caught the Trumpster red handed suddenly the shift would go to denying collusion occurred to saying it's no big deal. You guys are so pathetic.
You are a lying piece of shit.
Fox News host's Mostly False claim collusion isn't a crime
What are they paying you?
collusion isn't a crime, not in the way it's being used here.
Example, if Trump and Putin had made a TV commerical together, wheere they made fun of Hillary . Not a crime.
Now if Trump had paid Putin, or given him some financial consideration or promised some form of payment, that's a violation of federal campaign laws because you can NOT pay a foreigner for campaign work, but that is not collusion. Collusion in this context absolutely is not against the law.
You guys didn't explain it this way a month ago. A month ago there was no collusion. Nothing burger remember. You didn't explain that there was collusion but it was the OK kind.
"It seems to me that what has been meant by collusion since this controversy began has been some agreement or understanding that the Russians would in some way assist Trump’s electoral prospects and would be rewarded in some way by Trump as president acting favorably toward Russia," Lowenstein said. "That would very likely be illegal and surely would be highly improper."
Stanford University law professor Nathaniel Persily cited the
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. A
2011 U.S. District Court ruling based on that law found that foreign nationals could not make expenditures "to expressly advocate the election or defeat of a political candidate."
"A foreign national spending money to influence a federal election can be a crime," Persily said. "And if a U.S. citizen coordinates, conspires or assists in that spending, then it could be a crime."
How much did Russia spend on Facebook ads alone making up fake anti Hillary stories?
Russia's RT reveals Twitter's pitch to sell millions of dollars in 2016 election ads