A REVIEW OF WHAT HAS ACTUALLY HAPPENED:
1.) On
Monday, during a hearing of the House Permanent Subcommittee on Intelligence, the heads of the FBI and NSA
categorically denied President Donald Trump’s tweets claiming that President Barack Obama ordered the US intelligence community to wiretap Trump Tower during the 2016 presidential campaign.
2.)
Sometime between the hearing and Wednesday morning, the committee’s chair,
Devin Nunes, received a tip from an unnamed source that US intelligence had picked up the communications of some Trump staff during the presidential transition.
3.)
The raw intelligence that Nunes reviewed showed no evidence of a wiretap on Trump. Rather, it showed that the conversations had been intercepted incidentally under a court-ordered FISA warrant. In plain English, that means Trump officials had spoken to a foreign national whose communications were being monitored by US intelligence, so their conversations were picked up despite the fact that they weren’t targets of surveillance.
4.) Before taking this information to the FBI or the other members of the House Intelligence Committee, Nunes briefed his
political boss, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.
5.)
Around midday on Wednesday, Nunes went public, holding a press conference to announce that "the intelligence community incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition." During the press conference, he initially suggested the president’s personal communications had been hoovered up, but then backtracked to say it was merely "possible" that Trump was recorded.
6.) Afterwards, he went to the White House to brief the president’s team. He still had yet to meet with the ranking Democrat on House Intelligence, Adam Schiff.
7.) After his briefing with Nunes, around 3 pm, Trump told reporters that the Congress member’s revelations "somewhat" vindicated his claim that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower, even though they did nothing of the kind.
8.) Around the same time as Trump’s comments,
Nunes told NBC’s Kasie Hunt that he could not share the raw intelligence with the rest of the House Intelligence Committee because he doesn’t actually have the raw intelligence in his possession — raising the question of how he managed to vet it sufficiently before going public in the first place.
9.)
On Thursday, Nunes held another press conference.
When a reporter asked him if the intercepts were given to him by members of the Trump administration, he refused to answer, saying "we’re not going to ever reveal sources." 














The House Intelligence chair went public with his own read of raw intelligence transcripts before properly vetting it with his colleagues. He has offered no coherent explanation as to why bypassing normal vetting channels was acceptable behavior, where the information came from, or even what he was thinking when he decided to do it.
Nunes’s public presentation of this information was also incredibly confusing, done in a way that makes little sense unless he was deliberately trying to obscure the truth about whether the president was wiretapped.
So Nunes appears to have, in a very short amount of time, torched his own credibility in defense of a clearly false tweet sent out by Donald Trump. And he did all of this at a time when the FBI is investigating evidence that the Trump campaign may have coordinated with Russian efforts to undermine the US election — charges that the House Intelligence Committee is, in theory, supposed to be investigating as well.
This is not normal.
http://www.vox.com/world/20...