Again, D'Souza showed video of Mark Andrews dropping off multiple ballots in his 2000 Mules movie, insisting 'This is a crime'.
It wasn't. Mark Andrews was dropping off his own ballot and those of registered voter family that lived with him.
Which is perfectly legal.
D'Souza's claim was so factually inaccurate, his allegations of violations of the law so baseless...
.that Mark Andrews is now suing D'Souza for defamation. And D'Souza has stopped accusing Andrews in his promotional tours.....despite the video of Mark Andrews being his 'smoking gun' and 'best evidence' of voter fraud.
You guys keep making hysteric claims of 'crimes' that again and again turn out to be perfectly legal acts.
Again and again, your ilk have demonstrated that you don't know you're talking about. Your 'smoking guns' turn out to be nothing.
And shocker, here we are again: Exact same claims, exact same 'evidence', exact same allegations........all of which were proven laughably wrong before.
But this time its different? Why?