- Mar 31, 2009
- 106,753
- 90,259
- 3,605
No doubt. The brainwashing is strong.
Took you to the depths
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No doubt. The brainwashing is strong.
Maybe quote the ruling saying there was no due process givenWith the ruling.
Its like a broken record.
Thats a change that trump has legal authority to makeThey aren't here illegally. They are on visas that Trump revoked illegally.
Overstayed their visas...That's not an "oopsie"...Here's your "due process"...Maybe quote the ruling saying there was no due process given
What wasn’t given specifically?
And that's your excuse for firebombing innocent people?No, thats not what you even wrote. Asylum claims don't just "expire".
And that's your excuse for firebombing innocent people?
In lib la la land it doesCan’t every illegal alien from the third world claim a need for asylum?
What a great answerBugger off.
Democrats are basically saying they will protect the family of any would be terrorist.And right on cue a fucking judge, like all Democrats, will do A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G to halt a deportation. We've seen the length Democrats will go to, to protect criminals and keep them from being deported!!!!!!!!!!!!
Correct he was deniedNo, thats not what you even wrote. Asylum claims don't just "expire".
Correct he was denied
I don't know----was Soliman's big for ASYLUM accepted? As far as I know--not all cases are so accepted"Question for today: If Mohamed Sabry Soliman had committed no crimes of any kind how would his presence in the United States have made native-born Americans better off? What was the best case scenario and, therefore, the rationale for our policy? (Or maybe the answer is that we have intentionally set up an immigration policy to make ourselves worse off?)
Separately, the asylum claim is kind of interesting. Some U.S. bureaucrats apparently believed Mohamed Sabry Soliman’s assertion that Egypt was too dangerous for a human to inhabit. At the same time, the country that is too dangerous for humans to inhabit now has roughly 4X as many humans as it did in 1960."
![]()
How was the immigration of Mohamed Sabry Soliman supposed to benefit Americans?
Egyptian enricher Mohamed Sabry Soliman recently attacked some Jews in Boulder, Colorado who were out of step with the Free Palestine portion of the Progressive dogma. Colorado Public Radio (1% tax…philip.greenspun.com
There was a bill to reform the asylum process and make the processing much quicker but some dipshits torpedoed the bill and said it wasn’t necessary.
Republicans love having opinions on legislation without having any clue what they’re talking about.
That bill contained tons of poison, and the dems wouldn't have used the extra courts anyway.
Trump closed the border without the bill, proving he was right that it was bullshit.
Trump would have used the extra courts. Or maybe his plan was to make the crisis worse so that he could seize even more unconstitutional and dictatorial power.
You are told there’s poison in the bill, but that’s just because you’re a hack who just says whatever he’s told to believe by your cult leaders.