BREAKING: Federal judge issues order halting deportation of Colorado antisemitic attack suspect’s family

They aren't here illegally. They are on visas that Trump revoked illegally.
Thats a change that trump has legal authority to make

And while true for some aliens, you are just guessing or hoping it applies to that family

And even if it does apply to them it does not excuse what the father did
 
Maybe quote the ruling saying there was no due process given

What wasn’t given specifically?
Overstayed their visas...That's not an "oopsie"...Here's your "due process"...

weeeeeee-backover-the-border-you-go-savage-wall-funinthesun-funny-21390527.webp
 
No, thats not what you even wrote. Asylum claims don't just "expire".
And that's your excuse for firebombing innocent people?

Whatever his legal argument for asylum might have been before, it has literally gone up in smoke now
 
Bugger off.
What a great answer

You must think firebombing is ok for illegal aliens applying for asylum

To repeat

Whatever his legal argument for asylum might have been before, it has literally gone up in smoke now
 
I can’t find the filings online but I am assuming the problem here is that Trump’s thugs want to use expedited removal process which most likely isn’t available based on their time in country.
 
"Question for today: If Mohamed Sabry Soliman had committed no crimes of any kind how would his presence in the United States have made native-born Americans better off? What was the best case scenario and, therefore, the rationale for our policy? (Or maybe the answer is that we have intentionally set up an immigration policy to make ourselves worse off?)

Separately, the asylum claim is kind of interesting. Some U.S. bureaucrats apparently believed Mohamed Sabry Soliman’s assertion that Egypt was too dangerous for a human to inhabit. At the same time, the country that is too dangerous for humans to inhabit now has roughly 4X as many humans as it did in 1960."


 
"Question for today: If Mohamed Sabry Soliman had committed no crimes of any kind how would his presence in the United States have made native-born Americans better off? What was the best case scenario and, therefore, the rationale for our policy? (Or maybe the answer is that we have intentionally set up an immigration policy to make ourselves worse off?)

Separately, the asylum claim is kind of interesting. Some U.S. bureaucrats apparently believed Mohamed Sabry Soliman’s assertion that Egypt was too dangerous for a human to inhabit. At the same time, the country that is too dangerous for humans to inhabit now has roughly 4X as many humans as it did in 1960."


I don't know----was Soliman's big for ASYLUM accepted? As far as I know--not all cases are so accepted
 
There was a bill to reform the asylum process and make the processing much quicker but some dipshits torpedoed the bill and said it wasn’t necessary.

Republicans love having opinions on legislation without having any clue what they’re talking about.

That bill contained tons of poison, and the dems wouldn't have used the extra courts anyway.

Trump closed the border without the bill, proving he was right that it was bullshit.
 
That bill contained tons of poison, and the dems wouldn't have used the extra courts anyway.

Trump closed the border without the bill, proving he was right that it was bullshit.

Trump would have used the extra courts. Or maybe his plan was to make the crisis worse so that he could seize even more unconstitutional and dictatorial power.

You are told there’s poison in the bill, but that’s just because you’re a hack who just says whatever he’s told to believe by your cult leaders.
 
Trump would have used the extra courts. Or maybe his plan was to make the crisis worse so that he could seize even more unconstitutional and dictatorial power.

You are told there’s poison in the bill, but that’s just because you’re a hack who just says whatever he’s told to believe by your cult leaders.

We were told closing the border required, it, and Trump proved that wasn't the case.
 
Back
Top Bottom