aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,689
- 280
Paris, 23 janvier 2016: action BDS dans un supermarché.
I thought France made boycott illegal.
The picture was a lie. It was debuked long ago
they are promoting boycott on intentional untruths
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paris, 23 janvier 2016: action BDS dans un supermarché.
I thought France made boycott illegal.
If BDS is so irrelevant, why all the fuss?
...Most thought it was an EO supporting the BDS Movement. It is No Such Thing...
...Most thought it was an EO supporting the BDS Movement. It is No Such Thing...
Well if you must converse with Zionuts all the time...![]()
Indeed why is Israel singled out for such RACIST ACTION when islamonazi states are allowed free reign to carry on. Can you answer that without resorting to racist LIES ?
So simple and so obvious.
BDS is a Palestinian call to end Israel's occupation.
Israel singled itself out.
Indeed why is Israel singled out for such RACIST ACTION when islamonazi states are allowed free reign to carry on. Can you answer that without resorting to racist LIES ?
So simple and so obvious.
BDS is a Palestinian call to end Israel's occupation.
Israel singled itself out.
Interesting article here, Tinny. It shows what crackpots your fellow BDSers are.
Against Abnormalization: BDS Targets a Major Lebanese-Born Writer?
P F Tinmore, et al,
About six years ago, I use to listen to al-Jazeera (English) almost daily.
View attachment 79438
(COMMENT)
There is very little question that al-Jazeera is controversial; both in terms of whether of not it is anti-Semitic, and whether or not it is anti-American. Some might even think it is time to evaluate al-Jazeera in terms of subversion and sedition. But that is very hard to do without being called to task on the support of freedom of speech.
Some analyst think that while al-Jazeera is losing market share, it is really not any more off-center than other unbalanced media outlets.
The problem is a matter of reputation. And now, anytime Americans see that al-Jazeera logo, they automatically associate it with anti-Americanism. Other associations are nearly just as damaging. Al-Jazeera finds its main benefactor in the Royal Family, Doha, Qatar. Doha is diverse and is both the home of the Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau as well as the Al Udeid Air Base and Camp Andy [US Central Command (USCC) and US Air Force Central Command (USAFCC)]; that also doubles as the Prepositioned War Reserve Material for region USAF operations. None the less, that little logo invokes an emotion that will remain for at least two generations.
Naomi Klein (from a Canadian Jewish Family) is one of those period emergences in the activists world that replaces the old with the new. She was born when I was serving in Vietnam, and will become one of those replacements for Naom Chomsky. Naomi Klein is very bright and somewhat of an enigma herself. But even as somewhat of a anti-American, anti-Capitalist, Anti-Semetic promoter, she is writing for a profit, will write what sells, maintains her standing on activism --- all to maintain wealth and standing.
Most Respectfully,
R
Is this a C/P from an Israeli propaganda rag?P F Tinmore, et al,
This is both an anti-Israeli and anti-American venting of the perception of charges by the (Lily White) Palestinians; as if the counter-terrorism security measures were not gradually applied of a sustained period of terrorist attacks.
Whether we go back to the 1920 Jerusalem incident of April 1920 incited by Haj Amin Al-Husseini --- or --- the 1967 Sirhan Sirhan incident when a Palestinian assassinates a United States Senator, Robert F. Kennedy, in Los Angeles --- or --- move forward to the 1972 Munich Olympic Terrorist Attack by Palestinians of the infamous Black September, we see a pattern developing. Whether we start with the 1975 attack on the Tel Aviv Savoy Hotel by Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) terrorists, or the Palestinians in a 1978 bus hijacking killed 35 innocent Israelis civilians; or move event further forward to 1985 piracy on the high seas by Palestinian Liberation Front of the cruise ship MS Achille Lauro, --- or --- if we just jump right into more 21st Century events like when 12 October 2000 ---- First Cpl. Yosef Avrahami and First Sgt. Vadim Novesche, 33, two reserve IDF soldiers, were lynched by a Palestinian mob at the police building in Ramallah; there is a very, very long linage of past criminal behaviors by the Palestinians. And as, over time, Palestinian terrorist attacks continued --- so it was that counter-terrorism security measures intensified and improved over time. No set of security countermeasures are perfect; and approach will last forever. But the people of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would have been better served if they had been actively working towards peace the entire time.
(THE VIDEO CLIP)
So the US is an Imperialist Nation supporting the colonial activity spearheaded by the criminal regime of the State of Israel. And any nation that even buys something from Israel is enabling the Jewish National Home in it repressive activities extended over the abandon Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
So what is new? This is now and has been the mantra of the Hostile Arab Palestinians all my life (may be even before the time of Israeli Independence).
Ask any leader, in the Middle East of otherwise, the pinnacle of the strategy is: Don’t capitulate to the intimidation or coercion targeted against the civilian population; the purpose of which is to influence the policy of a government; to end Israel as a Jewish State. Muslim States and Islamic States are acceptable, but the Earth is not big enough for a Jewish National Home in a Jewish State. And the current understanding of the Palestinian demand for the “Right of Return” becomes more muddled at every meeting. The capitulation also the issues of settlements and borders, but has no history for which Palestinians can ever demonstrate a previous claim to sovereignty.
The clip is a (blatant) diatribe on the US and Israel. Blindly lashing out with no objective or specific goal by which they would be satisfied.
The Israelis are the (more diverse cultural) minority in the Middle East trying to survive.
Most Respectfully,
R
Ben Shapiro reminds me of Max Headroom.
No dumbshit, the only reason the Palestinians talk only about Israel is because Israel is the only one occupying Palestine.
Your uncivlized friends apparently believe that they should have their own way at disrupting things on campus. The latest is that criminal charges might be filed.Is this a C/P from an Israeli propaganda rag?P F Tinmore, et al,
This is both an anti-Israeli and anti-American venting of the perception of charges by the (Lily White) Palestinians; as if the counter-terrorism security measures were not gradually applied of a sustained period of terrorist attacks.
Whether we go back to the 1920 Jerusalem incident of April 1920 incited by Haj Amin Al-Husseini --- or --- the 1967 Sirhan Sirhan incident when a Palestinian assassinates a United States Senator, Robert F. Kennedy, in Los Angeles --- or --- move forward to the 1972 Munich Olympic Terrorist Attack by Palestinians of the infamous Black September, we see a pattern developing. Whether we start with the 1975 attack on the Tel Aviv Savoy Hotel by Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) terrorists, or the Palestinians in a 1978 bus hijacking killed 35 innocent Israelis civilians; or move event further forward to 1985 piracy on the high seas by Palestinian Liberation Front of the cruise ship MS Achille Lauro, --- or --- if we just jump right into more 21st Century events like when 12 October 2000 ---- First Cpl. Yosef Avrahami and First Sgt. Vadim Novesche, 33, two reserve IDF soldiers, were lynched by a Palestinian mob at the police building in Ramallah; there is a very, very long linage of past criminal behaviors by the Palestinians. And as, over time, Palestinian terrorist attacks continued --- so it was that counter-terrorism security measures intensified and improved over time. No set of security countermeasures are perfect; and approach will last forever. But the people of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would have been better served if they had been actively working towards peace the entire time.
(THE VIDEO CLIP)
So the US is an Imperialist Nation supporting the colonial activity spearheaded by the criminal regime of the State of Israel. And any nation that even buys something from Israel is enabling the Jewish National Home in it repressive activities extended over the abandon Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
So what is new? This is now and has been the mantra of the Hostile Arab Palestinians all my life (may be even before the time of Israeli Independence).
Ask any leader, in the Middle East of otherwise, the pinnacle of the strategy is: Don’t capitulate to the intimidation or coercion targeted against the civilian population; the purpose of which is to influence the policy of a government; to end Israel as a Jewish State. Muslim States and Islamic States are acceptable, but the Earth is not big enough for a Jewish National Home in a Jewish State. And the current understanding of the Palestinian demand for the “Right of Return” becomes more muddled at every meeting. The capitulation also the issues of settlements and borders, but has no history for which Palestinians can ever demonstrate a previous claim to sovereignty.
The clip is a (blatant) diatribe on the US and Israel. Blindly lashing out with no objective or specific goal by which they would be satisfied.
The Israelis are the (more diverse cultural) minority in the Middle East trying to survive.
Most Respectfully,
R
BTW, what clip? Link?
You have a short memory Hoss..........much like the rest of the Dross on here.........Poor old Hossie banged his head on the Wanted poster by his bedYour uncivlized friends apparently believe that they should have their own way at disrupting things on campus. The latest is that criminal charges might be filed.Is this a C/P from an Israeli propaganda rag?P F Tinmore, et al,
This is both an anti-Israeli and anti-American venting of the perception of charges by the (Lily White) Palestinians; as if the counter-terrorism security measures were not gradually applied of a sustained period of terrorist attacks.
Whether we go back to the 1920 Jerusalem incident of April 1920 incited by Haj Amin Al-Husseini --- or --- the 1967 Sirhan Sirhan incident when a Palestinian assassinates a United States Senator, Robert F. Kennedy, in Los Angeles --- or --- move forward to the 1972 Munich Olympic Terrorist Attack by Palestinians of the infamous Black September, we see a pattern developing. Whether we start with the 1975 attack on the Tel Aviv Savoy Hotel by Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) terrorists, or the Palestinians in a 1978 bus hijacking killed 35 innocent Israelis civilians; or move event further forward to 1985 piracy on the high seas by Palestinian Liberation Front of the cruise ship MS Achille Lauro, --- or --- if we just jump right into more 21st Century events like when 12 October 2000 ---- First Cpl. Yosef Avrahami and First Sgt. Vadim Novesche, 33, two reserve IDF soldiers, were lynched by a Palestinian mob at the police building in Ramallah; there is a very, very long linage of past criminal behaviors by the Palestinians. And as, over time, Palestinian terrorist attacks continued --- so it was that counter-terrorism security measures intensified and improved over time. No set of security countermeasures are perfect; and approach will last forever. But the people of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would have been better served if they had been actively working towards peace the entire time.
(THE VIDEO CLIP)
So the US is an Imperialist Nation supporting the colonial activity spearheaded by the criminal regime of the State of Israel. And any nation that even buys something from Israel is enabling the Jewish National Home in it repressive activities extended over the abandon Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
So what is new? This is now and has been the mantra of the Hostile Arab Palestinians all my life (may be even before the time of Israeli Independence).
Ask any leader, in the Middle East of otherwise, the pinnacle of the strategy is: Don’t capitulate to the intimidation or coercion targeted against the civilian population; the purpose of which is to influence the policy of a government; to end Israel as a Jewish State. Muslim States and Islamic States are acceptable, but the Earth is not big enough for a Jewish National Home in a Jewish State. And the current understanding of the Palestinian demand for the “Right of Return” becomes more muddled at every meeting. The capitulation also the issues of settlements and borders, but has no history for which Palestinians can ever demonstrate a previous claim to sovereignty.
The clip is a (blatant) diatribe on the US and Israel. Blindly lashing out with no objective or specific goal by which they would be satisfied.
The Israelis are the (more diverse cultural) minority in the Middle East trying to survive.
Most Respectfully,
R
BTW, what clip? Link?
Anti-Israel protesters disrupt Israeli movie screening at UC Irvine