Moral Narcissism and the MLAs Obsession with Israel
January 8, 2014 by Richard L. Cravatts
Characterized by the same paroxysms of self-righteousness as were evident in the much-maligned and tendentious academic boycott by the American Studies Association (ASA) last month, members of the Modern Language Association (MLA) head to Chicago during the first week of January for the organizations 129th convention. The annual meeting, which is generally attended by a third of the MLAs 30,000 members, has, as New Criterion editor, Roger Kimball, wryly noted, customarily provided observers of the academic scene with a spectacle as appalling as it is rich in unintended comedy, complete with a full range of barbarous jargon, intellectual pos*turing, and aggressive politicization that has infected the academic study of the human*ities in this country . . . .
But this years conference promises even more intellectual acting out, given that the MLAs Radical Caucus has proposed a resolution that will call on the U.S. State Department to contest Israels arbitrary denials of entry to Gaza and the West Bank by U.S. academics who have been invited to teach, confer, or do research at Palestinian universities. Why the focus on Israel by these scholars of the English language and humanities? Because, as presiding officer Samer M. Ali smugly put it, as far as the MLA is concerned, Israel deserves to be demonized for its perceived transgressions, and the question that [attendees] will be debating is not whether Israel is violating the rights of Palestinians, but what to do about it.
...
One might expect that the MLA would also be concerned with womens rights in the Middle East, given members like Berkeleys feminist philosopher, Judith Butler, who notoriously delivered a paper at a past MLA conference entitled, The Lesbian Phallus: Or, Does Heterosexuality Exist?, and who more recently, and almost surreally, commented that it is important to view Hamas/Hezbollah as social movements that are progressive, that are on the left, that are part of a global left. Perhaps MLA resolutions should be passed to help offer Muslim women greater educational opportunities, since statistics indicate that while only 22 percent of men in the Middle East and North Africa are illiterate, that rate soars to 42 percent for Muslim women. Hamas also imposes dress codes on girls, and a UN report noted that in Egypt, over 99 percent of women and girls had experienced sexual harassment in some form.
And, finally, if MLA members are so concerned with education and Israel, and the side effects of social strife, perhaps they should also ask for State Department reports on the unrelenting rocket fire from Hamas-controlled Gaza into southern Israeli towns, such as Sderot, where over 43 percent of middle school students suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of prolonged shelling of civilian neighborhoods and schools since the 2005 disengagement.
Of course, the MLAs Radical Caucus is silent on all of these obstacles to education and the free exchange of ideas, both in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, and the wider world of Israels neighbors. It is easy to demonize Israel, and certainly it requires no bravery in academia, where moral narcissists console each other in an echo chamber of good intentions, willing to sacrifice academic integrity, true scholarship, and vigorous, honest debate in the process.
Moral Narcissism and the MLA?s Obsession with Israel | FrontPage Magazine