The Anti-Zionist Challenge to the Jewish Establishment
February 19, 2014 by Caroline Glick
There is a difference between speech and war. Both are forms of expression, to be sure. But the essence of the former is engagement, and the essence of the latter is destruction.
This distinction is apparently too subtle for many of IsraelÂ’s Supreme Court justices. On Sunday, the Court heard arguments on the constitutionality of the 2011 Anti-Boycotts law. The law allows targets of boycotts to sue boycotters for damages in civil courts, and empowers the finance minister to revoke the non-profit status of NGOs that engage in boycotts. It is being challenged by a consortium of foreign-funded, radical, anti-Zionist NGOs.
The essence of boycotts is destruction, not engagement.
...
The most outspoken critics of Israeli anti-Zionist NGOs and J Street are on the Right. And that makes sense. It isnÂ’t hard for rightists to make the distinction between speeches and extortion.
But the primary target of these groups is not the Right.
It is the leftist Jewish establishment, in Israel and in the US. And as J StreetÂ’s nearly unchallenged rise in the US, and the CourtÂ’s self-defeating incoherence on the boycott campaign indicate, over the decades, the establishment Left has become so dependent on rejecting the Right for its own sense of identity, that it is no longer clear whether its members are capable of siding with the hated Right against their common foes.
The Anti-Zionist Challenge to the Jewish Establishment | FrontPage Magazine