Vandalshandle
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Hey...uh... I missed your answer:Seems to me the real "crime" of the parents was not properly teaching their child what to touch and what not to touch. I guarantee that child will no longer touch a firearm without proper adult supervision. He learned the lesson the hard way, but that's what some children need.
I've got a smaller selection of firearms around my condo, and less loose ammo, but when one considers the other self-defense tools (knives, swords, axes, etc....) that are strategically placed around my home, I'd say that I'm well beyond 20.
Why, of course! It is the three year old's fault!
How would background checks, need-justidied licensieng, registration, a 3-day waiting period, a ban on hi-cap magazines and/or 'assault wepaons' prrevent this from happening?
I can't be responsible for your failure to read my post. I will type it very slow this time. If this man is convicted of Child Endangerment, he should be forbidden by law to have any guns in his house until his children reach majority. That is a my opinion of an appropriate gun control advocacy law. But, now that you mention it, I would also be in favor of a law requiring a person to demonstrate proficiency and safety to legal authorities, before he is allowed to own a gun. This would be similar to passing a driver's license test before dad tosses you the keys to the F350.
