Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
Didn't he use an Assault Rifle, which people want banned - regardless of whether he got the assault rifle by passing a background check?
In other words, regardless of the point of your topic, if assault rifles were banned he still wouldn't of shot people.
Leaving aside the fact that you're misusing the term "assault rifle", you're a dimwit if you think the difference between "cuddly, fluffy bunny who would never hurt anyone" and "crazed killer on a spree" was owning that particular gun. "If THAT GUN was banned, and he hadn't had THAT GUN, he wouldn't have shot people." Really? As opposed to . . . using a different gun? Just acquiring one illegally? Blowing the store up instead, or setting it on fire? What is hard to understand about the fact that the MURDEROUS INTENT is the reason people kill other people, not the tool they use?