Bondi Going Bye Bye

[Dragonlady]

What’s bad about wanting America to be great?

Define "great", because what Trump is doing is destroying everything that made American "great" in the first place.

 

[j-mac]

As a percentage, Trump comes out 44th (out of 60 elections) for the Electoral College.

The bottom 2/3rds.

WW

View attachment 1239294

List of United States presidential elections by Electoral College margin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Still your President…

 

[Dragonlady]

So, here is Dragonbreath telling us in the US that it's ok when Democrats do it.....lol

Pointing out the differences is not saying it's OK, but continue to lie, Mac. It proves that facts don't matter to you.

 

[j-mac]

Define "great", because what Trump is doing is destroying everything that made American "great" in the first place.

Like what exactly?

 

[JonKoch]

Ah, ah, ah, not so fast…he nearly stated that Joe was too far gone mentally, to stand trial….Hur didn’t clear shit..

AI Overview



Robert Hur
did not charge President Biden with criminal wrongdoing regarding the retention of classified documents, but he specifically stated he did notexonerate him. While concluding that evidence did not support criminal charges, Hur’s report indicated Biden "willfully retained and disclosed classified materials"and noted Biden's "significantly limited" memory during interviews.
The Hill +5
Key Findings from the Hur Report and Testimony:

• No Charges, Not Exoneration: Hur stated in testimony, "I did not exonerate him," clarifying that the word "exoneration" does not appear in his report.
• Willful Retention: The report found evidence that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials (specifically concerning Afghanistan and handwritten notebooks) to his ghostwriter.
• "Well-Meaning, Elderly Man": Hur concluded that a criminal conviction was unlikely, partly because a jury might view Biden as a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".
• Cooperation: The report noted Biden’s cooperation with the investigation, including consenting to searches and sitting for interviews.

Hur testified that his decision not to prosecute was based on the evidence and the likelihood of conviction, not to "sanitize" his findings.

Nearly stated? Is that some type of legal verbiage? lol

 

[j-mac]

Pointing out the differences is not saying it's OK, but continue to lie, Mac. It proves that facts don't matter to you.

Hmmmm, funny that you only seem to condemn certain things when republicans are in power, never when dems are? Weird.

 

[j-mac]

Nearly stated? Is that some type of legal verbiage? lol

Mistype…should have read “merely”

 

[JonKoch]

Wrong.

But, since that irks you so, how do you feel about people like Susan Rice making it clear that democrats will go after anyone that provided support of Trump if they take power back?

I’m sure that’s fine and proper to you…scumbag.

These comments were made in the context of predicting a future Democratic "accountability agenda" upon retaking power in Congress or the White House.

• Targets of "Accountability": She specifically cited corporations, law firms, universities, and media companies that she believes have bowed to pressure from Trump, violated principles, or skirted laws.

• No "Forgive and Forget": Rice said that if corporations believed Democrats would "play by the old rules" and ignore actions taken to support Trump, "they've got another thing coming".

Supporters' Defense: Some commentators, such as those at Democracy Docket, defended Rice, arguing that her stance was a necessary response to what they described as the erosion of independent agencies and the rule of law under the Trump administration

 

[Dragonlady]

Still your President…

For how long????

 

[j-mac]

For how long????

3 more glorious years….enjoy.

Then you’ll have a President Vance, or Rubio for 8….

Keep doubling down on crazy.

 

[struth]

Your "conservative" "news" network.... Gutfeld from HuffPo....

Rupert Murdoch Loves Hillary Clinton

Conservative Media Mogul To Host Fundraiser For Liberal N.Y. Senator

www.cbsnews.com

Haha well I like how Clinton thought she was gonna position herself to be the next John Edwards! Haha

 

[j-mac]

These comments were made in the context of predicting a future Democratic "accountability agenda" upon retaking power in Congress or the White House.

• Targets of "Accountability": She specifically cited corporations, law firms, universities, and media companies that she believes have bowed to pressure from Trump, violated principles, or skirted laws.

• No "Forgive and Forget": Rice said that if corporations believed Democrats would "play by the old rules" and ignore actions taken to support Trump, "they've got another thing coming".

Supporters' Defense: Some commentators, such as those at Democracy Docket, defended Rice, arguing that her stance was a necessary response to what they described as the erosion of independent agencies and the rule of law under the Trump administration

Well, that’s just hilarious…When Trump was touting these sorts of ideas, people like you called it “revenge”, and “retribution campaigns”… IOW, YOU can do it, but Republicans can’t…Simple double standards.

Just admit that dems are fascists, and want to jail me for voting Trump.

 

[berg80]

Like what exactly?

Just a small sampling...............The rogue actions of this regime should not be thought of as being limited to its actions in international affairs. Like with the war crimes it has committed. It has gone rogue domestically as well in more ways that one can count. From the illegal deportations denying due process to deportees, the daily violation of the Epstein File Transparency Act, the hideously corrupt, unwarranted pardons, the appointments of unqualified US Attorneys to facilitate the prosecution of political enemies, ICE's violations of court orders, it's been overwhelming.

 

[berg80]

Well, that’s just hilarious…When Trump was touting these sorts of ideas, people like you called it “revenge”, and “retribution campaigns”… IOW, YOU can do it, but Republicans can’t…Simple double standards.

Just admit that dems are fascists, and want to jail me for voting Trump.

The fallacy in your premise being that trump's prosecutions were unjust. If you read the indictments you'll find they weren't.

 

[JohnDB]

Weird, Cheeto and his admin did no type of background check for Bondi huh, his former AG? You'd think her former employment would show up??

Trump has MANY former Democrats on his payroll in significant positions.

That's something that the current Democrats seem to forget. That the Democrat Party has moved so far left that they left most of their party members behind. The current director of National Security was a Democrat presidential candidate who participated (and won imho) in a televised debate against Biden and Kamala .
Kennedy (our current FDA) was also a Presidential candidate on the Democrat ticket.

These aren't people who were Democrats in name only....they honestly still believe in principles the Democrat Party has abandoned for more far extreme leftist dogma. Same thing with Musk.

Just because people belong to a different party doesn't really mean anything. Trump used to be a Democrat too. But he eventually had more in common with Republicans than Democrats. Because the Democrat Party "evolved" into Marxist, socialist, dogma Stereotypes....
Trump actually is personal friends with the Clinton's...even if he did win against her candidacy.

 

[berg80]

Kennedy (our current FDA) was also a Presidential candidate on the Democrat ticket.

He ran for prez as an independent. But more to your point, he and Gabbard are power seeking opportunists. Much like trump himself who was once a D but realized he couldn't get elected running as one. He appeals to bigots, the misinformed, uninformed, and the gullible. It's a Repub thing.

 

[JohnDB]

The fallacy in your premise being that trump's prosecutions were unjust. If you read the indictments you'll find they weren't.

Pam Bondi WAS the biggest friend of the Democrats in Trump's Administration.

She SLOW walked the Epstein files to keep them in the news for as long as possible. Making it look like she was refusing to publish them with the weakest of excuses every time asked.

Then, even though she has piles of evidence and cases she could prosecute with clear, compelling evidence...she has arrested nobody. Not a single political person has had a warrant.
The ONE case she tried had the arrest warrant so screwed up it was amazing it worked at all....much less when the judge threw the whole hot mess out of his courtroom. (Which they did not try again...
WHY?)

Bondi has said mean, mad words but done nothing except allow the statute of limitations run out on some of the charges possible.

 

[j-mac]

Just a small sampling...............The rogue actions of this regime should not be thought of as being limited to its actions in international affairs.

First off, this isn't a "regime"... the President is an elected official of the United States. Equating it as a regime makes whatever comes after this tainted by ideological bias.

Like with the war crimes it has committed.

Such as? Lay them out for us....

It has gone rogue domestically as well in more ways that one can count.

You mean you don't like what he was elected to do? tough shit.

From the illegal deportations denying due process to deportees,

Nothing has changed in policy with deportations from the time when Obama was deportating illegals...And I for one hope that he finds a way to ramp it up! We have 30 million that need to go.

the daily violation of the Epstein File Transparency Act,

Nothing is violated, the files were released.

the hideously corrupt, unwarranted pardons,

After the Biden autopen pardons, you have GOT to be kidding me.

the appointments of unqualified US Attorneys to facilitate the prosecution of political enemies,

The President has the right to appoint whomever he wants.

ICE's violations of court orders, it's been overwhelming.

That's a problem I hope he addresses as well. The leftist corruption of our courts with ideological hacks, ruling based on their political feelings is not justice.

 

[pknopp]

The fallacy in your premise being that trump's prosecutions were unjust. If you read the indictments you'll find they weren't.

The issue was they were unfair. Biden was no less guilty.

 

[j-mac]

The fallacy in your premise being that trump's prosecutions were unjust. If you read the indictments you'll find they weren't.

Ah bullshit, y'all twisted misdemeanors into felonies, all in the attempt to break, and jail the man simply for challanging what you see is your entitlement to power....you should be ashamed.