Trump complained about having to flush toilet 15 times per go.
Trump changed the Whitehouse toilets to higher flow rate.
Trump changed the Whitehouse toilets to higher flow rate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump complained about having to flush toilet 15 times per go.
Trump changed the Whitehouse toilets to higher flow rate.
Okay....let's see one of the WH staff testify under oath that trump did not flush documents or throw food against the wall....under oath!Whatever that is yes, but at least I'm smart enough not to believe the BS in the OP.
Who from the WH will come forward and refute theses claims UNDER OATH? No one wants to perjury themselves for the self serving POS.Have you forgotten to take your TDS meds again?
Okay....let's see one of the WH staff testify under oath that trump did not flush documents or throw food against the wall....under oath!
It ain't gonna happen. No one is willing to perjure themselves for the self serving POS.
Who from the WH will come forward and refute theses claims UNDER OATH? No one wants to perjury themselves for the self serving POS.
so the WH doesnt properly paint the wall behind a toilet ?This morning's Axios has a follow up article on the stories of several months ago about DonT allegedly and illegally destroying presidential papers by flushing them down the toilet.
Yeah, I know. It sounds icky.
Still, it is a story of more than suspicious and surreptitious behavior. And there are some legs to the story.
As you see in the Axios story.....there are now pictures.
Anyway, here is what Axios published this morning:
(note -- they properly gave a Trump spox a chance to respond. Which one did. She was not supportive. Duh!)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Remember our toilet scoop in Axios AM earlier this year? Maggie Haberman's forthcoming book about former President Trump will report that White House residence staff periodically found wads of paper clogging a toilet — and believed the former president, a notorious destroyer of Oval Office documents, was the flusher.
Trump denied it and called Haberman, whose New York Times coverage he follows compulsively, a "maggot."
- Why it matters: Destroying records that should be preserved is potentially illegal.
Haberman — who obtained the photos recently — shared them with us ahead of the Oct. 4 publication of her book, "Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America."
- Well, it turns out there are photos. And here they are, published for the first time.
Trump spokesperson Taylor Budowich told Axios: "You have to be pretty desperate to sell books if pictures of paper in a toilet bowl is part of your promotional plan."
- A Trump White House source tells her the photo on the left shows a commode in the White House.
- The photo on the right is from an overseas trip, according to the source.
- "We know ... there's enough people willing to fabricate stories like this in order to impress the media class — a media class who is willing to run with anything, as long as it anti-Trump."
Cover: Penguin Press
Between the lines: The new evidence is a reminder that despite the flood of Trump books, Haberman's is hotly anticipated in Trumpworld.
Haberman's sources report the document dumps happened multiple times at the White House, and on at least two foreign trips.
The handwriting is visibly Trump's, written in the Sharpie ink he favors.
- "That Mr. Trump was discarding documents this way was not widely known within the West Wing, but some aides were aware of the habit, which he engaged in repeatedly," Haberman tells us.
- "It was an extension of Trump's term-long habit of ripping up documents that were supposed to be preserved under the Presidential Records Act."
View attachment 679277
- The scrawls include the name of Rep. Elise Stefanik of upstate New York, a Trump defender who's a member of House Republican leadership.
"Between the lines: The new evidence is a reminder that despite the flood of Trump books, Haberman's is hotly anticipated in Trumpworld."
NOTE: Maggie Halberman of the New York Times is the reporter that DonT has given more one-on-one interviews than any other (well, maybe Hannity has now overtaken her?).
Trump follows Halberman's reportage closely....by all accounts.
well, that's easy for him to say.Rep. Adam Schiff has promised to get to the bottom of Trump’s toilet.
so the WH doesnt properly paint the wall behind a toilet ?
Mmmm?
You are asking my avatar about wall paint?
Really?
Well, let's keep it simple: He doesn't know.
But good luck in your search.
BTW......the new name of this thread is not the title that I gave it when establishing the OP.
Evidently one mod or another or maybe a Moderator Select Committee.....decided (which is their recognized right) to put there own somewhat pejorative and dismissive title to it.
Hey that's the way it goes.
No harm. No foul. We be cool.
But your avatar isn't going to be any smarter than you...
Axios is the antithesis of "credible."Poster Censored, after you read the Axios reportage in the OP....well, what did you think of it?
Did it sound credible to you?
Why?
Or, why not?
Axios is the antithesis of "credible."
You too fucking stupid to grasp the dozens of posts that explain why the pictures are clearly NOT the white house bathroom in the oval office.
That is interesting. I did not know that.
Why do you say such....or rather, what is your source for such?
"Too f*cking stupid"?
Well, I have heard argument on both side of that issue.....affirming and disputing.
So no need to get into it here.
I did note though in the Axios article posted in the OP that at least one of the pictured toilets was from an "overseas trip".
So there is that.
Regardless, you seemed to have missed the query about what you thought of the Axios article after you had read it.
So, what did you think? Did you read it?
so the WH doesnt properly paint the wall behind a toilet ?
Axios is a leftist hate site - literally zero credibility.
So, it is safe to presume poster Censored did NOT read the Axios reportage offered in the OP?
"She dug up a conspiracy theory debunked long ago"
"debunked"???
I didn't know that either.
Nor had I heard it.
Do you have a source for that? It could be an interesting read.
CALL: "Yes, debunked."
RESPONSE: "Do you have a source for that? It could be an interesting read."