Blowing Up Darwin

[Sherlock Holmes]

Your usual cowardly retreat, pumpkin. You can be a fool all the time with your profound ignorance,

Yet you thought Dawkins supported theism and you call me ignorant?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

No, you can look it up, if you're curious.

Suffice it to say he is as agnostic about your god as he is fairies and leprechauns.

But technically agnostic, all the same.

An agnostic atheist.

What is an agnostic atheist? Someone who believes its not possible to know if they are an atheist?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Id'iot creationism is self-refuting.

Richard Dawkins isn't a creationist though.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Considering how frequently the ID'iot creationers post his youtube videos, he's another of your gods.

Fort Fun Indiana do you agree with Hollie on this point?

 

[Hollie]

Yet you thought Dawkins supported theism and you call me ignorant?

You thought wrongly that Dawkins was a religionist. People call you ignorant for a reason.

 

[Hollie]

Richard Dawkins isn't a creationist though.

You thought he was.

 

[Hollie]

Fort Fun Indiana do you agree with Hollie on this point?

You just can't help but beg for my attention.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Why aren't any of the religioners making dumb arguments like this about star formation?

Because the natural process of star formation doesn't clash with their iron age, magical fetishes.

There's nothing natural about the laws of nature. How such laws came to exist is very obviously something that can ever be explained by recourse to laws. How long have you been posting paradoxical propositions without knowing it?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

As your religious extremism is so debilitating you have never had an intelligent post.

You're just a run of the mill Bible thumper.

Of course you cannot quote a single post in this thread that contains "religious extremism" but I can point out many that contain scientism extremism and they mostly emanate from you.

 

[Hollie]

There's nothing natural about the laws of nature. How such laws came to exist is very obviously something that can ever be explained by recourse to laws. How long have you been posting paradoxical propositions without knowing it?

So then. You insist that nature is unnatural. Not surprisingly for a hyper-religious loon.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You thought wrongly that Dawkins was a religionist. People call you ignorant for a reason.

That's a lie though, you can (for the first time in your life) substantiate your statement by quoting me, but I won't be holding my breath.

 

[Hollie]

Of course you cannot quote a single post in this thread that contains "religious extremism" but I can point out many that contain scientism extremism and they mostly emanate from you.

You latest masterstroke of hyper- religious looney about natural being unnatural is hilarious.

If you emerge from your coma, you will find that to be funny.

 

[Hollie]

That's a lie though, you can (for the first time in your life) substantiate your statement by quoting me, but I won't be holding my breath.

Hold your breath. I'll tell you when to stop. Sometime after you stop posting Dawkin's youtube videos in support of your religious extremism.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You thought he was.

That's not the case, you aren't paying attention, here's what I actually said about Dawkins when I introduced him to the thread:

Do you - an agnostic like Dawkins - agree with Dawkins on this point?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You just can't help but beg for my attention.

Not at all, I'm trying to help you overcome your indoctrination and devotion to the cult of scientism, one day you'll thank me.

 

[Hollie]

That's not the case, you aren't paying attention, here's what I actually said about Dawkins when I introduced him to the thread:

View attachment 1055602

You still insist that youtube videos by Dawkins will support your gods.

How long have you been comatose?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

So then. You insist that nature is unnatural. Not surprisingly for a hyper-religious loon.

Of course it is, prove me wrong if you want to try.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You still insist that youtube videos by Dawkins will support your gods.

No, Dawkins believes in Intelligent Design.

How long have you been comatose?

 

[Hollie]

Not at all, I'm trying to help you overcome your indoctrination and devotion to the cult of scientism, one day you'll thank me.

Religious frauds tend to revile science, as you do, which is why your Cult of fear, ignorance and superstition has been superceded by the disciplines of science, knowledge and learning.

 

[Hollie]

No, Dawkins believes in Intelligent Design.

Why are you ascribing your religious extremism to others? Does Dawkins believe in your Bible absurdities?