Blowing Up Darwin

[Hollie]

"That is what Science is working on - since religion doesn't offer any explanation (aside from God aka ID) without any proof."



What proof has science developed for Darwin's thesis?



"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302

As you mindlessly cut and paste, a glaring failure you don' t understand is the context of scientific terms and definitions. Species do not suddenly appear in terms of geologic time frames.

 

[Kruska]

What proof has science developed for Darwin's thesis?

Biological/DNA diversity and Degeneration, resulting into mutations and extinction, e.g. due to a low population.

As such refuting and proofing that an Adam&Eve and those Noah folks (incl. all animals) couldn't have continued humanity nor animal live and vegetation. BOOM

 

[Hollie]

Did you actually write this????????

"Darwin did not offer to explain life on earth."

Tell the truth....it's been downhill since you started hangin' out with Jack.........Daniels.




AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was specifically designed to explain the variety of life on Earth, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptations to their environment, resulting in the vast array of species we see today.


You have brought into doubt everything you have written.

You don't even bother reading what you cut and paste.

"Yes, Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was specifically designed to explain the variety of life on Earth...."

Yes, the variety produced by adaptation and descent with modification". In what theory are those terms prominent?

 

[Hollie]

Biological/DNA diversity and Degeneration, resulting into mutations and extinction, e.g. due to a low population.

As such refuting and proofing that an Adam&Eve and those Noah folks (incl. all animals) couldn't have continued humanity nor animal live and vegetation. BOOM

The whole Noah sea cruise fable gets really creepy when you extend the fable to examine the context. The gods made allowances for Noah and his immediate family to repopulate the planet by way of incestuous and familial relations?

 

[Kruska]

The whole Noah sea cruise fable gets really creepy when you extend the fable to examine the context. The gods made allowances for Noah and his immediate family to repopulate the planet by way of incestuous and familial relations?

It's simply due to Hebrews starting a desperate effort some 2900 years ago, to make up and started writing a book, comprising mostly of other civilization's accounts and tales - that would prove to the "illiterate" that they are the chosen people by God, that God himself therefore is a Hebrew - and that God promised them land.

It's all and only about LAND for Hebrews. Later becoming a religious doctrine. and the basis for Judaism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Since you believe in God - replace science with God, after all he is humanities biggest foe and murderer - according to your Bible

So that is your belief about Western Civilizaton.....which is the origin and the gift of the Judeo-Christian faith.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Biological/DNA diversity and Degeneration, resulting into mutations and extinction, e.g. due to a low population.

As such refuting and proofing that an Adam&Eve and those Noah folks (incl. all animals) couldn't have continued humanity nor animal live and vegetation. BOOM

You have a lot to learn, and I am here to teach you.


"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



"There are no laboratory demonstrations of speciation, millions of fruit flies coming and going while never once suggesting that they were destined to appear as anything other than fruit flies.
More than six thousand years of breeding and artificial selection, barnyard and backyard, have never induced a chicken to lay a square egg or persuade a pig to develop wheels or ball bearings."
Berlinski



Belief in Darwin is no different than belief in any other religion.
All are based on faith.


Go forth and sin no more.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's simply due to Hebrews starting a desperate effort some 2900 years ago, to make up and started writing a book, comprising mostly of other civilization's accounts and tales - that would prove to the "illiterate" that they are the chosen people by God, that God himself therefore is a Hebrew - and that God promised them land.

It's all and only about LAND for Hebrews. Later becoming a religious doctrine. and the basis for Judaism.

Interesting that those Hebrew, who lived in a desert, correctly predicted the development of life on earth.


Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.

Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.



Rather than ridicule the Bible, those very same secular, atheistic scientists have come around to accept the very order that the Old Testament claimed was the course of creation:
The idea of the miraculous confluence of the first chapter of Genesis and the sequence advanced by modern science is as follows:


a. The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.


b. From a water covered planet, to terrestrial life. The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.


c. If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, …then the seas appeared on earth, …and that life forms were photosynthetic.

d. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today.

e. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.

The above largely from chapter nine of zoologist Andrew Parker’s “The Genesis Enigma.”



Wow! What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

Or…an alternative explanation: divine intervention.




In your face, booooyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!

 

[abu afak]

It's simply due to Hebrews starting a desperate effort some 2900 years ago, to make up and started writing a book, comprising mostly of other civilization's accounts and tales - that would prove to the "illiterate" that they are the chosen people by God, that God himself therefore is a Hebrew - and that God promised them land.

It's all and only about LAND for Hebrews. Later becoming a religious doctrine. and the basis for Judaism.

And yet ie, Islam isn't?
Mecca, Medina, Jerusalem. (the second, largely a Jewish city 1500 yrs ago) (the last falsely and parenthetically inserted into the Koran.)
Arabs were originally only from the Arabian Peninsula, now rule large parts of North Africa and the Middle East since Big Mo lit a fire under their asses.

Modern Zionism mostly if not uniquely 1870s idea as a refuge for pesrsecuted EU Jews, is pretty humble/tiny compared to ie, 'Manifest Destiny' as well.
`

 

[abu afak]

..Belief in Darwin is no different than belief in any other religion.
All are based on faith.


Go forth and sin no more.

Lying/sinning Bimb0!
Evolution belief is based on 160 years of ever-growing and overwhelming EVIDENCE.
God/S have none. Just faith/belief without evidence.
`

 

[Kruska]

Interesting that those Hebrew, who lived in a desert, correctly predicted the development of life on earth.

Fake news

Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.

Fake news

Parker’s plea is that faith in God and an acceptance of modern science is indeed possible without holding on to a naïve biblical literalism.

That is the good part of the Genesis Enigma. Unfortunately, Parker takes on far more than can be sufficiently addressed in his 280-page book, leaving both conservative and progressive Christian readers wholly unconvinced.

As such just a plea - without any proof - as expected by a person who believes in superstition, aka a God or ID.

 

[Woodznutz]

You are obviously clueless about paleontology, anthropology, geology, oceanography, physics, archaeology, and other branches of science which collectively support the Theory of Evolution.

At gunpoint.

 

[Woodznutz]

Since you believe in God - replace science with God, after all he is humanities biggest foe and murderer - according to your Bible

He's going to do it again.

 

[Woodznutz]

The whole Noah sea cruise fable gets really creepy when you extend the fable to examine the context. The gods made allowances for Noah and his immediate family to repopulate the planet by way of incestuous and familial relations?

Aren't you glad you're not a Moabite or Ammonite?

 

[Robert W]

Neither the view that Darwin offered to explain life on earth, or the Bible's version is able to submit to experimentation. There is no "proof" for either.
Both provide elegant explanations.
Both require simple belief.


Notice, further, that the Left poltical view chooses Darwin and abhors God as the explanation, and the Right sees the Judeo-Christian explanation for life on earth, and for Western Civilization itself.
Isn't that interesting?

That's what they "taught" you to "believe" in government school, the Left's church.

At the time, I lived as a 1st grader in Oakland, CA during WW2. At the school, an invitation was offered to attend Catholic teaching and I did go to one class. It was not on campus. It was at a suitable location. At that time my parents had not exposed me to religion at all.

 

[Robert W]

Since you believe in God - replace science with God, after all he is humanities biggest foe and murderer - according to your Bible

Are you more in danger from GOD or from humans?

 

[Hollie]

Aren't you glad you're not a Moabite or Ammonite?

I’m glad I had parents who passed on the ideals of morals and personal integrity.

 

[Woodznutz]

Fake news

Fake news

Parker’s plea is that faith in God and an acceptance of modern science is indeed possible without holding on to a naïve biblical literalism.

That is the good part of the Genesis Enigma. Unfortunately, Parker takes on far more than can be sufficiently addressed in his 280-page book, leaving both conservative and progressive Christian readers wholly unconvinced.

As such just a plea - without any proof - as expected by a person who believes in superstition, aka a God or ID.

ID is just another term for planned. It is clear that every living creature was purposely designed. Evolution doesn't do that.

 

[Woodznutz]

I’m glad I had parents who passed on the ideals of morals and personal integrity.

Does that include marriage before having children?

 

[Hollie]

ID is just another term for planned. It is clear that every living creature was designed. Evolution doesn't do that.

There is no reason to accept claims such as “every living creature was designed”. why would the gods design life on the planet and then destroy it 65 million years ago?

“Do Over” to get rid of the faulty “design”.?